D. S. H. L. Kim, J. Y. Kim / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1287–1289
1289
5. Results and discussion
Figure 1 shows colorimetrically determined results of
MTT reduction assay on PC12 cells, treated overnight
with test compounds (5.0 mg/mL) in the presence of
bA(1-42) at 5.0 mg/mL, respectively. The results further
confirm that the efficacy of these shogaols in protecting
cells from bA(1-42) insult improves as the side-chain
length increases. The compounds increased cell pro-
tectivity from bA insult with respect to the increasing
side chain length may be due to increased cell perme-
ability of the compounds
In the present study shogaols were prepared in five
steps. These shogaols were shown to protect PC12 and
IMR-32 cells from bA insult (Table 1). Their efficacy to
protect PC12 and IMR-32 cells from bA insult was
shown to improve as the length of the side chain
increase. The best result was obtained with [12]-shogaol
(14). These shogaols did not show any cytotoxicity
against PC12 and IMR-32 cells at concentrations >129
mM. These shogaols were shown to protect cells from
bA(1-42) insult better than curcumin (15) (ED50=17.1–
23.9 mM). Antioxidant property of these compounds19
may be responsible for protecting cells from bA insult.
In conclusion, our results suggest that shogaols may
be potentially valuable natural therapeutic agents for
the treatment of AD patients. We are in a process of
developing these compounds into such therapeutic
agents.
Table 1. Evaluation of zingerone 3, shogaols (6–14), and curcumin
(15) against b-amyloid(1-42) insult toward PC12 and IMR-32 cells
Acknowledgements
We thank PCRPS for the use of NMR and bioassay
facilities.
Compd
PC12
IMR-32
References and notes
ED50 (mM)
1. Garber, K. Technology Review 2001, 104, 70.
2. Kawahara, M.; Kuroda, Y. Brain Res. Bull. 2000, 53, 389.
3. Findeis, M. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1502, 76.
4. Kim, D. S. H. L.; Kim, D. S.; Oppel, M. N. Planta Med-
ica 2002, 68, 375.
5. Kikuzaki, H.; Nakatani, N. J. Food. Sci. 1993, 58, 1407.
6. Schulick, P. Ginger: Common Spice and Wonder Drug.
1994, Herbal Free Press, Ltd. Brattleboro, VT.
7. Fox, J. E.; Lipfert, L.; Clark, E. A.; Reynolds, C. C.;
Austin, C. D.; Brugge, J. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268,
25973.
3
6
7
8
>129
45.9Æ11.6
29.0Æ3.8
16.3Æ5.4
8.6Æ4.8
5.9Æ3.6
4.4Æ2.2
1.8Æ0.8
0.5Æ0.2
0.2Æ0.1
17.1Æ5.7
>129
61.2Æ12.9
37.4Æ6.1
24.2Æ4.3
12.0Æ3.4
8.8Æ3.9
6.2Æ2.8
3.3Æ1.2
1.4Æ0.2
0.5Æ0.2
23.9Æ4.8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
8. Hikino, H.; Kiso, Y.; Kato, N.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T.;
Aiyama, R.; Itokawa, H.; Kiuchi, F.; Sankawa, U. J.
Ethnopharmacol. 1985, 14, 31.
ED50 represent the sample concentration that is required to achieve
50% cell viability, a mid-point between the positive control values and
the negative control values.
9. Suekawa, M.; Ishige, A.; Yuasa, K.; Sudo, K.; Aburasa,
M.; Hosoya, E. J. Pharmacobiodyn. 1984, 7, 836.
10. Banno, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc., Japan 1976,
49, 1453.
The tests were performed in triplets on three different dates. Data
are meanÆSEM from nine determinations. P<0.05 (student’s t-test).
11. Miyashita, N.; Yoshikoshi, A.; Grieco, P. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 3772.
12. Denniff, P.; Whiting, D. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-
mun. 1976, 712.
13. Denniff, P.; Macleod, I.; Whiting, D. A. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 82.
14. Pike, C. J.; Walencewicz, A. J.; Glabe, C. G.; Cotman,
C. W. Brain Res. 1991, 563, 311.
15. Pollack, S. J.; Sadler, I. I. J.; Hawtin, S. R.; Tailor, V. J.;
Shearman, M. S. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 184, 113.
16. Kim, D. S. H. L.; Park, S. Y.; Kim, J. Y. Neurosci. Lett.
2001, 303, 57.
17. Shearman, M. S.; Ragan, C. I.; Iversen, L. L. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 1470.
18. Park, S. Y.; Kim, D. S. H. L. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1227.
19. Ippoushi, K.; Azuma, K.; Ito, H.; Horie, H.; Higashio, H.
Life Sci. 2003, 73, 3427.
Figure 1. PC12 cells were treated overnight with test compounds (5
mg/mL) in the presence of bA(1-42) at 5.0 mg/mL, respectively. Cell
viability was colorimetrically determined using MTT reduction assay.
The tests were performed in triplets on three different dates. Data are
meanÆSEM from nine determinations. P<0.05 (student’s t-test).