Hydration degree of gel and enzyme activity
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 50, No. 10, October, 2001
1895
rations (Fig. 6). In this study, we showed that the
kinetic behavior of α-chymotrypsin immobilized into
gel 2 does not virtually differ from that of the native
enzyme for which the detected activity is determined by
the substrate nature. The values of the Michaelis con-
stants for preparations 1 and 2 (the data are not pre-
sented) coincide in the whole interval of the used
concentrations of an organic solvent, i.e., neither the
type of the matrix, nor its state affect the en-
zymesubstrate equilibrium. Similar facts suggest that
specific interactions of the protein globule of α-chymot-
rypsin with both DMSO and the matrix of 2, which
undergoes the phase transition, are similar and result in
local conformation changes near the active site of the
enzyme (cf. Figs. 5 and 6).
In fact, the driving force of gel 2 compression is an
enhancement of the hydrophobic interactions in the
polymer with both the temperature increase and an
increase in the concentration of an organic solvent in
the mixture. If the interactions of α-chymotrypsin with
2 become more energetically favorable than those with
water with an increase in the polymer hydrophobicity,
we can assume that the polymer (similarly to DMSO)
results in local conformational changes in the active site
of the enzyme by the interaction with the substrate-
binding protein pocket. The same mechanism (the in-
teraction of 2 with the protein with an increase in the
polymer hydrophobicity) takes place, most likely, in the
case of the temperature compression of the poly-N-iso-
propylacrylamide matrix.
biocatalysts phospholipid membranes) during the phase
transition act as unique "antennas," which perceive the
external stimulus and, specifically interacting with the
protein globule, regulates the activity of the biocatalyst.
Especially note the complete reversibility of the ob-
served kinetic effects, which provides a possibility to
create catalyst preparations purposefully regulated by
various external effects.
This work was financially supported in part by the
Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No.
98-03-32204à).
References
1. J. K. Raison, J. M. Lyons, and W. W. Thomson, Arch.
Biochem. Biophys., 1971, 142, 83.
2. K. Watson, E. Bertoli, and D. E. Griffiths, Biochem. J.,
1975, 146, 401.
3. P. E. Clark and M. A. Moscarello, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
1986, 859, 143.
4. A. V. Levashov, N. L. Klyachko, N. G. Bogdanova, and
K. Martinek, FEBS Lett., 1990, 268, 238.
5. A. A. Boldyrev, in Biomakromolekuly v metode spinovykh
metok i zondov [Biomacromolecules in the Method of Spin
Labels and Probes], Nauka, Moscow, 1988, 80 (in Russian).
6. A. M. Shur, Vysokomolekulyarnye Soedineniya [High-Mo-
lecular-Weight Compounds], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1981
(in Russian).
7. T. Amiya and T. Tanaka, Macromolecules, 1987, 20, 1162.
8. T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1978, 40, 820.
9. Y. Li and T. Tanaka, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 1992, 22, 243.
10. L. C. Dong and A. S. Noffman, J. Control. Release,
1986, 4, 223.
11. L. C. Dong and A. S. Hoffman, in Reversible Polymeric
Gels, Ed. P. Russo, ASC Symposium Series, ASC, Wash-
ington, DC, USA, 1987, 236.
12. N. L. Eremeev, L. V. Sigolaeva, and N. F. Kazanskaya,
Vestnik MGU, Ser. 2, Khimiya, 1992, 33, 511.
13. N. L. Eremeev, L. V. Sigolaeva, P. A. Simakov, and N. F.
Kazanskaya, Biokhimiya, 1995, 60, 1307 [Biochemistry (Mos-
cow), 1995, 60, 991 (Engl. Transl.)].
It is substantial that the kinetic effects observed in
this case are completely reversible. The multiple transfer
of the immobilized preparation from the purely aqueous
medium into an aqueous-organic medium and vice versa
have no effect on the observed activity of the prepara-
tion determined at a specified concentration of DMSO
in the mixture.
*
*
*
14. N. L. Eremeev, A. V. Kukhtin, E. A. Belyaeva, and N. F.
Kazanskaya, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 1999, 76, 45.
15. H. Plaut and J. J. Ritter, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1951, 74, 4076.
16. I. V. Berezin and K. Martinek, Osnovy fizicheskoi khimii
fermentativnogo kataliza [Foundations of Physical Chemistry
of Enzymatic Catalysis], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1977,
280 pp. (in Russian)
17. S. Gestrelius, B. Mattiasson, and K. Mosbach, Eur. J.
Biochem., 1973, 36, 89.
18. N. L. Eremeev, A. V. Kukhtin, and N. F. Kazanskaya,
Biosystems, 1998, 45, 141.
19. V. V. Mozhaev, Yu. L. Khmelnitsky, M. V. Sergeeva, and
A. B. Belova, Eur. J. Biochem., 1989, 184, 597.
20. N. L. Eremeev, E. A. Belyaeva, and N. F. Kazanskaya,
Bioorgan. Khim., 1999, 25, 460 [Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem.,
1999, 25, 391 (Engl. Transl.)].
21. E. A. Belyaeva and N. L. Eremeev, Vestnik MGU, Ser. 2,
Khimiya, 2000, 41, 392 [Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull., 2000,
41 (Engl. Transl.)].
Thus, the compression of the gel due to blocking of
the electrostatic repulsion between the likely charged
groups of the support, i.e., a simple increase in the
density of the polymeric network, has no effect on the
observed activity of immobilized α-chymotrypsin. At
the same time, the specificity of the interaction of the
protein globule with the matrix is observed for the
enzyme immobilized in the poly-N-isopropylacrylamide
gel in which the compression of the matrix (and the
corresponding change in its hydration degree) is in-
duced by the phase transition of the polymer. Analysis
of the data on the behavior of α-chymotrypsin immobi-
lized into the poly-N-isopropylacrylamide gel during the
compression of the matrix in water/dimethyl sulfoxide
mixtures suggested the local interactions of polymeric
chains of the stimulus-sensitive support with the protein
globule. The data presented indicate that the stimulus-
sensitive hydrogels (as well as natural supports of
Received March 5, 2001;
in revised form September 7, 2001