.
Angewandte
Communications
Figure 2. Conversion profiles for the methanolysis of methyl paraoxon
(*) and PNPDPP (&) in the presence of UiO-66 as functions of time.
Gray ^ represent the conversion profile for the uncatalyzed reactions.
Scheme 1. a) Methanolysis of both methyl paraoxon (R=CH ) and
3
PNPDPP (R=phenyl). b) Hydrolysis of methyl paraoxon (R=CH ).
3
workers noted the efficacy of zirconium hydroxide for the
decomposition of the nerve agents VX, Soman (GD), and
distilled mustard (HD).
after 5 h (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information) exhibits
a resonance at d = À4.4 ppm (15% relative intensity) that can
be attributed to dimethyl phenyl phosphate, the second
methanolysis product of PNPDPP.
The conversion profiles for both methyl paraoxon and
PNPDPP methanolyses are shown in Figure 2. Interestingly,
[
23]
Intrigued by the observation that metal oxides/hydroxides
are quite reactive toward nerve agents based on phosphate
[
1,23]
esters,
we turned to an alternative class of materials,
[24–26]
metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).
Owing to their
porosity and broad compositional tunability, MOFs have
attracted significant attention as potential catalysts for a wide
the reaction half-lives are independent of the substrate (t1/2 =
45–50 min for both phosphate triesters). We postulate that
under our reaction conditions, the rate of methanolysis is
limited by the formation of methoxide. Initial rates of 5 ꢀ
[
24,27,28]
range of chemical reactions.
Furthermore, given their
crystallographically resolved structures, MOFs are highly
amenable to mechanistic and computational studies (by
contrast, such studies are much more difficult at the surface
À6
À1
À6
À1
10 m s and 4 ꢀ 10 m s were observed for methyl para-
oxon and PNPDPP, respectively; no appreciable background
reaction was observed over the course of 24 h. In comparison
to several catalysts reported for the methanolysis of methyl
[
29]
of bulk metal oxides/hydroxides and inside POPs).
Herein, we report the use of the MOF UiO-66 (Fig-
[
30]
[8,15,21]
ure 1c)
methanolysis and hydrolysis of two organophosphate nerve
as a compelling biomimetic catalyst for the
paraoxon and PNPDPP, UiO-66 is among the fastest.
For example, the half-life of methyl paraoxon methanolysis by
UiO-66 is 2–3 times shorter than that observed for the
analogous reaction catalyzed by our aluminum(III)-porphy-
[
31]
agent simulants. The node of UiO-66 is a [Zr O (OH) ]
6
4
4
cluster that contains several ZrÀOHÀZr bonds, reminiscent of
the bimetallic ZnÀOHÀZn active site found in phosphotries-
terase enzymes (Figure 1a,b). UiO-66 is also particularly
attractive as a solid catalyst because: 1) it is readily synthe-
sized in high yield, and 2) it is among the most chemically,
[21]
rin-containing POPs, and more than ten-fold shorter than
the half-life observed for the homogeneous, supramolecular
[15]
aluminum(III)-porphyrin-based catalyst. Relative to catal-
II
ysis by a dimeric Zn coordination complex structurally akin
[32–39]
hydrothermally, and mechanically stable MOFs known.
to the PTE active site, the half-life with UiO-66 is four times
[8]
Given the toxicity of phosphate nerve agents and the
concomitant risk in handling them, especially in the vapour
phase, we investigated the catalytic activity of UiO-66 using
the less toxic simulants methyl paraoxon (dimethyl 4-nitro-
phenyl phosphate) and p-nitrophenyl diphenyl phosphate
shorter.
Encouraged by the excellent activity of UiO-66 in
phosphate ester methanolysis, we decided to test the activity
of UiO-66 for catalytic hydrolysis. From the perspective of
human protection, as opposed to simple agent destruction,
hydrolysis is much more practical than methanolysis. Hydrol-
ysis of methyl paraoxon was carried out in the presence of
a 6 mol% slurry of UiO-66 in an aqueous solution containing
0.45m N-ethylmorpholine (as a buffer at pH 10 and also
presumably as a proximal base). As in the case of methanol-
ysis, the formation of p-nitrophenoxide was followed using
UV/Vis spectroscopy (Scheme 1b, Figure S2 in the Support-
(
PNPDPP) in solution (Scheme 1). The formation of UV/
blue-absorbing nitrophenol/nitrophenoxide makes for
straightforward monitoring of the reaction progress by using
UV/Vis spectroscopy (Scheme 1).
The UiO-66-catalyzed methanolysis of methyl paraoxon
and PNPDPP were carried out at 333 K by stirring a 6 mol%
slurry of UiO-66 powder (based on formula weight) in
methanol (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).
Although the methanolysis of methyl paraoxon necessarily
stops at trimethylphosphate, in the case of PNPDPP the first
methanolysis product, methyl diphenyl phosphate (Scheme
3
1
1
ing Information); however, the P{ H} NMR spectrum of the
product from the hydrolysis of methyl paraoxon (Scheme 1b)
did not show evidence of hydrolysis beyond dimethyl
phosphate, thus demonstrating the highly selective nature of
UiO-66. Figure 3 shows the percent conversion of methyl
paraoxon as a function of time at room temperature and
1
a), can undergo further methanolysis. Indeed, the
P{ H} NMR spectrum of the PNPDPP product recorded
3
1
1
4
98
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 497 –501