Article
Tsai et al.
with a magnetic stirrer bar was added aryl iodide (1.0 mmol),
Na2CO3 (1.2 mmol), and H2O (3 mL). After the addition of
PdCl2(NH3)2/L aqueous solution (1 mL; 1 ´ 10-3 mmol in 1 mL
H2O for Tables 1 and 2 and 1 ´ 10-4 mmol in 1 mL H2O for Table
3), the reaction mixture was pressurized with CO (10 atm). The
reaction vessel was then placed in an oil bath at 100 °C for 9 h (for
Tables 1 and 2) or 24 h (for Table 3). After cooling of the reaction
mixture to room temperature, CO gas was released in the fume
hood and the aqueous solution was transferred to a test tube. This
aqueous solution was added to 3 N HCl aqueous solution (2 mL)
and then extracted with EtOAc (3 ´ 5 mL), the combined organic
phase was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was then removed
under vacuum. Column chromatography on silica gel afforded the
desired product. All known hydroxycarbonylation products ob-
tained were pure, and their spectra (1H, and 13C NMR) were in
agreement with authentic samples.
166.2. 2-Toluic acid (2h)8. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 2.65 (s,
3H), 7.25–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.46 (m, 1H), 8.05–8.07 (m, 1H);
13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 22.1, 125.9, 128.4, 131.6, 131.9,
1
132.9, 141.4, 173.1. 2-Methoxybenzoic acid (2i)10. H NMR
(CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 4.05 (s, 3H), 7.03–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.58
(m, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d
56.8, 111.8, 117.7, 122.3, 133.6, 135.3, 158.2, 165.8. 3-Toluic
acid (2j)11. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 2.41 (s, 3H), 7.32–7.43
(m, 2H), 7.90–7.93 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 21.3,
127.4, 128.4, 129.2, 130.7, 134.6, 138.3, 172.6. 3-Methoxyben-
1
zoic acid (2k)11. H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 3.85 (s, 3H),
7.13–7.17 (m, 1H), 7.37 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 1.2 Hz,
1H), 7.70–7.73 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 55.5,
114.4, 120.5, 122.7, 129.6, 130.6, 159.6, 172.3. 3,5-Dimethyl-
benzoic acid (2l)11. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 2.37 (s, 6H),
7.23 (s, 1H), 7.72 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 21.2,
127.9, 129.1, 135.5, 138.2, 172.7. 1-Naphthoic acid (2m)11. 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 7.52–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.63–7.68 (m,
1H), 7.91 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J =
7.5 Hz, 1H), 9.09 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz)
d 124.6, 125.6, 125.9, 126.4, 128.2, 128.8, 131.7, 131.9, 133.9,
134.7, 173.1.
Typical procedure for the reuse of the catalytic aqueous
solution. The reaction was conducted following the procedure
described previously under the reaction conditions shown in Ta-
ble 2. After transferring the resulting aqueous solution to a test
tube, it was extracted with EtOAc (3 ´ 5 mL). The combined or-
ganic phase was washed with 3 N HCl aqueous solution and then
dried over MgSO4. The pure product was isolated by column
chromatography. The residual aqueous solution was then trans-
ferred to the stainless autoclave and charged with 1c, Na2CO3, and
CO for the next reaction.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We initiated our investigation by examining the ef-
fects of bases in the hydroxycarbonylation of aryl iodides,
and the influences of reaction temperature and CO pressure
on the reaction were not investigated. As shown in Table 1,
hydroxycarbonylation of iodobenzene 1a catalyzed by 0.1
mol% of PdCl2(NH3)2/L in the presence of 1.2 equiv Bu3N
and CO (10 atm) in water at 100 °C for 6 h led to no forma-
tion of benzoic acid 2a (Entry 1). Hence, Bu3N was re-
placed by several inorganic bases to improve the reaction.
Among the inorganic bases screened, 2a was delivered in
yields between 21% and 76% (Entries 2–6), and Na2CO3
was found to be the best base (Entry 6). We further pro-
longed the reaction time to 9 h using Na2CO3 as the base,
which furnished 2a in a 93% isolated yield (Entry 7). The
presence of the cationic 2,2¢-bipyridyl ligand is critical in
this Pd-catalyzed hydroxycarbonylation reaction, as only
5% of 2a was obtained in the absence of this ligand (Entry
8). Unfortunately, this catalytic system could not catalyze
hydroxycarbonylation of bromobenzene, even when acti-
vated 4-bromoacetophenone was employed (Entries 9 and
10).
1
Benzoic acid (2a)8. H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 7.44-
7.49 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.63 (m, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 128.5, 129.3, 130.2, 133.9, 172.2. 4-
Methylbenzoic acid (2b)8. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 2.45 (s,
3H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 21.8, 126.6, 129.2, 130.3, 144.7, 172.6. 4-
Methoxybenzoic acid (2c)8. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 3.88
(s, 3H), 6.95 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 55.5, 113.8, 121.6, 132.4, 164.0,
171.5. 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid (2d)5. 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, 400
MHz) d 6.81 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 10.17
(br, 1H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) d 115.6, 121.9, 132.0,
162.0, 167.6. 4-Fluobenzoic acid (2e)9. 1H NMR (d6-DMSO, 300
MHz) d 7.11–7.24 (m, 2H), 8.10–8.14 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (d6-
DMSO, 75 MHz) d 116.1 (d, J = 21.8 Hz), 127.8, 132.6 (d, J = 9.8
Hz), 163.7, 166.9 (d, J = 13.5 Hz). 4-Chlorobenzoic acid (2f)8.
1H NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) d 7.56 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (d,
J = 8.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) d 134.0, 134.9,
1
136.4, 143.0, 171.7. 4-Nitrobenzoic acid (2g)9. H NMR (d6-
DMSO, 300 MHz) d 8.16 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.7 Hz,
2H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO, 75 MHz) d 124.2, 131.2, 136.8, 150.5,
After the best base for hydroxycarbonylation of aryl
iodides was identified, the reusability of the aqueous cata-
770
© 2013 The Chemical Society Located in Taipei & Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2013, 60, 769-772