R. W. Jackson / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 5163–5165
5165
References
functionalities. As can be seen from entries 4 and 8 the
selectivity for the cleavage of t-butyl esters over t-butyl
ethers can be variable.6 After a reaction time of 1.25 h
in refluxing toluene, the fully protected serine derivative
8a was completely consumed. The product was
obtained in 84% total yield, and analysis of the 1H
NMR showed a 9/1 ratio of mono-deprotected/bis-
deprotected material. There was no evidence of Fmoc-
serine t-butyl ester in the reaction product. The
4-t-butoxycinnamate derivative 4a undergoes reaction
in a less selective manner, affording the mono- and
bis-deprotected products 4b and 4c in a ratio of 2.1/1.
In analogy to the serine derivative 8a, no evidence of
the phenol t-butyl ester was observed. Thus, the extent
of selectivity encountered in the cleavage of t-butyl
esters over t-butyl ethers appears to be substrate depen-
dent, with the rate of ester cleavage potentially being a
prime determinant.
1. (a) Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999; (b)
Kocienski, P. J. Protecting Groups; Thieme Medical Pub-
lishers: New York, 1994; pp. 125–128.
2. Wu, Y.-q.; Limburg, D. C.; Wilkinson, D. E.; Vaal, M. J.;
Hamilton, G. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2847–2849.
3. Jones, A. B.; Villalobos, A.; Linde, II, R. G.; Danishefsky,
S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2786–2797.
4. Preparation of 2b: To a solution of 2a (104.6 mg, 0.50 mmol)
in toluene (10 mL) was added SiO2 (2.5 g, EM Science Silica
Gel 60, 230–400 mesh). The solution was refluxed under N2
for 7 h, cooled to ambient temperature and diluted with 20
mL of 10% methanol/methylene chloride. Celite® was
added, and the solution filtered through a pad of Celite®
under vacuum. The solids were washed with methanol/
methylene chloride, and the filtrate concentrated in vacuo.
Residual toluene was readily removed by successive concen-
trations of ethyl acetate and hexane solutions of the
product. The acid 2b was obtained as a white solid (51.6 mg,
The trimethylsilyethyl (TMSE) ester is another protect-
ing group often utilized for carboxylic acids, and a
common mode of deprotection is acid-catalyzed cleav-
age, conditions which will often result in the removal of
t-butyl esters. Entry 9 shows that TMSE esters survive
the SiO2-promoted cleavage conditions, in this case
affording the acid in 78% yield after chromatography.
The high preference for cleavage of t-butyl esters over
TMSE esters has also been observed in a structurally
non-related substrate.7 These results indicate that these
two carboxylic acid protecting groups can generally be
employed in an orthogonal protecting group strategy.8
1
68%) with H NMR and LC/MS properties identical to an
authentic sample of p-anisic acid (Aldrich Chemical Co.).
5. Products were identified by comparison with authentic
1
material or by 300 MHz H NMR and MS. The starting
materials were prepared as follows: 1a and 2a were pre-
pared via reaction of the benzoyl chloride with KOtBu in
THF; 3a and 4a were prepared via Wittig reactions of the
substituted
benzaldehyde
with
(t-butoxycarbonyl-
methylene)triphenylphosphorane in refluxing toluene; 5a
and 8a were prepared by reacting Fmoc-Cl with Phe-OtBu
and Ser(tBu)-OtBu, respectively, in methylene chloride in
the presence of N-methylmorpholine (NMM); 6a and 7a
were prepared via coupling reactions of the appropriate
Fmoc-amino acid with the corresponding amino acid (t-
butyl ester) in methylene chloride using HATU and NMM;
the synthesis of 9a will be described elsewhere.
In conclusion, it has been shown that the use of stan-
dard flash chromatography grade silica gel is a novel
alternative for the cleavage of t-butyl esters and
enhances the usefulness of this functional group. The
mild cleavage conditions broadens the synthetic appli-
cations in which protected carboxylates can be utilized,
and the moderate to high selectivity observed in the
presence of other acid-labile protecting groups extends
the utility of the t-butyl ester as an orthogonal protect-
ing group.
6. Examples of selective removal of t-butyl esters in the
presence of t-butyl ethers: (a) Makara, G. M.; Marshall, G.
R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5069–5072; (b) MacPherson,
L. J.; Bayburt, E. K.; Capperelli, M. P.; Carroll, B. J.;
Goldstein, R.; Justice, M. R.; Zhu, L.; Hu, S.-i.; Melton, R.
A.; Fryer, L.; Goldberg, R. L.; Doughty, J. R.; Spirito, S.;
Blancuzzi, V.; Wilson, D.; O’Byrne, E. M.; Ganu, V.;
Parker, D. T. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 2525–2532.
7. Jackson, R.W., unpublished results.
8. Examples of selective removal of t-butyl esters in the
presence of TMSE esters: (a) Schmidt, U.; Zah, M.;
Lieberknecht, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991,
1002–1004; (b) Cassidy, M. A.; Crockett, N.; Leeper, F. J.;
Battersby, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996,
2079–2090.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to express his gratitude to Dr.
Nathan Ihle for helpful discussions.
.