C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
[CoIII(apAr)2]- complexes are 200-400 mV less reducing than most
cobaloxime(I) species.5 This permits reactions of CoIII(Et)(isqPh)2
with organozinc reagents to give the products of 2e- reductive
elimination, also without a change in cobalt oxidation state. The
redox-active ligand-mediated reactions are therefore complementary
to recently reported ligand-derived oxidative addition and reductive
elimination at d0 metal complexes.4b-d Notably, the surprising
proclivity for 2e- reactions over 1e- redox forms a basis for
development of new well-defined first-row metal catalysts for
selective cross-coupling cycles.
Scheme 3
The two remaining mechanisms both invoke conversion of
[CoIII(apAr)2]- directly to the five-coordinate CoIII(R)(isqAr)2 product
without Co-X bond formation, but these represent limits of the
potential 1e- vs 2e- redox pathways. The observed increase in
reaction rate with leaving group lability, I- > Br- > Cl-, does not
distinguish mechanism (i) versus (ii), and previously reported
reactions of CoIII(apAr)(isqAr) with sources of net [Cl•] to generate
CoIIICl(isqAr)2 demonstrate the ability of CoIII(apAr)(isqAr) to function
as a radical trap.5 However, the sum of the other experimental
observations does not support an electron transfer (ET) mechanism
(ii). For example, the [CoIII(apiPr)2]- anion is a better 1e- reductant
than [CoIII(apPh)2]-,5 but it reacts with alkyl halides at a significantly
decreased rate. Additionally, its slow reactions with 2° alkyl halides
as compared to 1° haloalkanes are inconsistent with a mechanism
of initial outer-sphere ET (ii). Instead, this sensitivity to steric
hindrance at carbon, as well as to steric encapsulation of the
cobalt(III) center by the [apiPr]2- ligands, is most consistent with
the SN2-type mechanism (i) wherein Co-R bond formation requires
direct attack of the nucleophilic cobalt center on the alkyl halide
electrophile.9,10
The accessibility of the alkylcobalt(III) complexes prompted us
to pursue reductive C-C bond-forming reactions with organozinc
compounds. Treating CoIII(Et)(isqPh)2 with PhZnBr (2-10 equiv)
in a 1:1 CH3CN/THF solution results in an immediate discharge
of the green color and formation of the reduced cobalt fragment
[CoIII(apPh)2]- (Scheme 1b).11 Complete consumption of 0.01 M
CoIII(Et)(isqPh)2 requires >6 equiv of PhZnBr, presumably because
phenyl transfer is sterically disfavored (Scheme 3b). GC-MS
analysis of the reaction mixtures shows the expected cross-coupling
product ethylbenzene in 10-15% yield (Table S2). The analogous
reactions with hexylzinc bromide similarly afford n-octane in
5-15% yield. Both reactions give small quantities of the corre-
sponding homocoupling byproducts, biphenyl (<2%) and dodecane
(<7%). Notably, addition of greater excesses of RZnX gives
nonstatistical product distributions, with increased yields of the
cross-coupling products relative to homocoupling.12 These data
imply that the C-C bond-forming reactions do not occur by radical
Co-Et homolysis at CoIII(Et)(isqPh)2. Studies to elaborate the
reductive elimination mechanism, and to optimize conditions for
catalytic cross-coupling (Scheme 3), are in progress.
Acknowledgment. We thank the ACS Petroleum Research Fund
(45130-G3), the NSF (CAREER CHE-0844693), and the Georgia
Institute of Technology for financial support. We acknowledge
David Bostwick for mass spectrometry.
Supporting Information Available: Complete synthetic and ex-
perimental details; selected UV-vis absorption spectra; collected
reaction rates for organohalide addition to [CoIII(apPh)2]-; tabulated
yields from organozinc halide coupling reactions; X-ray crystallographic
data and files in CIF format. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) For example, see: Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich,
F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998.
(2) Chirik, P. J.; Wieghardt, K. Science 2010, 327, 794–795.
(3) For some recent examples, see: (a) Czaplik, W. M.; Mayer, M.; Cvengros,
J.; Jacobi von Wangelin, A. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 396–417. (b) Oshima,
K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 81, 1–24. (c) Cahiez, G.; Moyeux, A. Chem.
ReV. 2010, 110, 1435–1462. (d) Sherry, B. D.; Fu¨rstner, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 1500–1511. (e) Gosmini, C.; Be´gouin, J.-M.; Moncombie,
A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3221–3223. (f) Frisch, A. C.; Beller, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 674–688. (g) Noda, D.; Sunada, Y.; Hatakeyama,
T.; Nakamura, M.; Nagashima, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6078–
6079. (h) Rudolph, A.; Lautens, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2656–
2670. (i) Liu, W.; Cao, H.; Lei, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2004–
2008. (j) Ca´rdenas, D. J.; Phapale, V. B. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 1598–
1607. (k) Zhou, J. S.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14726–
14727. (l) Vechorkin, O.; Hu, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1–5.
(4) For recent examples, see: (a) Nguyen, A. I.; Blackmore, K. J.; Carter, S. M.;
Zarkesh, R. A.; Heyduk, A. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3307–3316.
(b) Ketterer, N. A.; Fan, H.; Blackmore, K. J.; Yang, X.; Ziller, J. W.;
Baik, M.-H.; Heyduk, A. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4364–4374. (c)
Haneline, M. R.; Heyduk, A. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8410–8411.
(d) Stanciu, C.; Jones, M. E.; Fanwick, P. E.; Abu-Omar, M. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12400–12401. (e) Bowman, A. C.; Milsmann, C.;
Atienza, C. C. H.; Lobkovsky, E.; Wieghardt, K.; Chirik, P. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 1676–1684. (f) Lu, C. C.; Weyhermu¨ller, T.; Bill, E.;
Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 6055–6064. (g) Lippert, C. A.;
Arnstein, S.; Sherill, D.; Soper, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3879–
3892.
(5) Smith, A. L.; Clapp, L. A.; Hardcastle, K. I.; Soper, J. D. Polyhedron 2010,
29, 164–169.
(6) (a) Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Chaudhuri, P.; Chlopek, K.; Herebian, D.; Kokatam,
S.; Ray, K.; Weyhermu¨ller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Chem.sEur. J.
2005, 11, 204–224. (b) Poddel’sky, A. I.; Cherkasov, V. K.; Abakumov,
G. A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2009, 253, 291–324.
(7) The Co-C bond in alkylcobalmins and coezyme B12 models is typically
weak and homolyzed in visible light. See: Schrauzer, G. N.; Sibert, J. W.;
Windgassen, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6681–6688.
(8) Crabtree, R. H. The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals,
3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 2001.
In sum, the ability of redox-active ligands to facilitate both 2e-
pseudo-oxidative addition and reductive elimination reactions at
mononuclear square planar cobalt(III) complexes is predicated on
two properties: (1) The [CoIII(apAr)2]- species are very strong
nucleophiles, reminiscent of “supernucleophilic” cobaloxime(I)
complexes and square planar iridium(I) compounds that undergo
SN2-type oxidative addition of R-X.7,13 However, these cobalt(III)
anions are unusual nucleophiles. They have diradical S ) 1 ground
states,5 and their reactions with haloalkanes occur without a change
in oxidation state at the cobalt(III) centers because the redox-active
aminophenol-derived ligands in [CoIII(apAr)2]- supply both of the
necessary redox equivalents for the net 2e- transformation. (2) The
(9) The slow reaction of [CoIII(apPh)2]- with PhCH2X likely further highlights
the sensitivity of the reaction to steric hindrance.
(10) Reactions with haloalkanes that are probes of radical intermediates (e.g.,
(bromomethyl)cyclopropane) were inconclusive because the 1H NMR
spectrum of the organometallic alkylcobalt(III) products are broadened by
1
trace quantities of the S )
/
CoIII(apAr)(isqAr) decomposition product.
2
(11) The speciation of reduced cobalt complex is concentration dependent.
[CoIII(apPh)2]- reacts rapidly with PhZnBr to form an equilibrium adduct
that we tentatively formulate as [CoIII(Ph)(apPh)2]2-
.
(12) In both reactions the balance of the cobalt-derived ethyls was not found.
These may form butane, which is not quantitated by the GC-MS method
used.
(13) For example, see: Labinger, J. A.; Osborn, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19,
3230–3236, and references therein.
JA106212W
9
14360 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 41, 2010