Generation of the 1,4-Diphenyl-1,4-butanediyl Biradical
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 21, 1999 7845
1 (mixture of stereoisomers): 1H NMR (CDCl
, 250 MHz) δ
Sch em e 4
3
1
1
(
.9-2.3 (m, 4 H), 4.7 (m, 2 H), 7.2 (m, 10 H); 13C NMR (CDCl
41.2 (s), 128.7 (d), 128.4 (d), 126.8 (d), 63.0 (d), 62.7 (d), 37.5
278.0629, found
3
,
t), 37.2 (t); HRMS calcd for C16
H
16Cl
2
2
78.0623.
Syn th esis of tr a n s-2,5-Dip h en ylcyclop en ta n on e (8).
Preparation of ketone 8 was accomplished following a proce-
dure described in the literature.26 Thus, a mixture of R,R’-
diphenyladipic acid (3.50 g, 11.74 mmol) and finely powdered
barium hydroxide (0.25 g) was heated under a stream of
nitrogen, at 300-320 °C, until evolution of carbon dioxide
a phenyl group attached to one of the radical centers. This
observation can be a useful tool for the reexamination of
previous mechanisms thought to involve 1,4-diaryl-1,4-
butanediyl biradicals. Thus, the tetrahydronaphthalenes
detected in the sensitized photolysis of styrenes and 1,2-
diarylcyclobutanes would be actually direct products
formed from the biradical intermediates rather than
secondary photoproducts. Hence, their detection consti-
tutes further support for the advanced mechanistic
proposals. By contrast, the lack of formation of 6 in the
photolysis of 3,6-diphenyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrazine (19)
appears to be against the involvement of biradical 3 as a
key intermediate in this reaction. Instead, it can be
suggested that in this case photolysis of the first C-N
bond could lead to a diazenyl biradical (20), from which
(
about 2 h). Addition of hexane to the crude mixture precipi-
tated 1.5 g (6.35 mmol, 54% yield) of 8.
: 1H NMR (CDCl
, 250 MHz) δ 2.2 (m, 2 H), 2.6 (m, 2 H),
.5 (m, 2 H), 7.2-7.4 (m, 10 H); C NMR (CDCl
δ 215.3 (s), 138.4 (s), 128.6 (d), 128.1 (d), 127.0 (d), 55.8 (d),
8
3
1
3
3
3
, 62.5 MHz)
+
2
9.5 (t); MS m/z 236 (M , 12), 208 (7), 117 (7), 104 (100); HRMS
calcd for C17 16O 236.1201, found 236.1205.
H
Con ven tion a l La m p Ir r a d ia tion of Com p ou n d s 1, 8 10,
a n d 12. A cyclohexane solution of the compound either in a
quartz (1) or Pyrex tube (8, 10, and 12) was irradiated for 1 h
with a 125-W medium-pressure mercury lamp inside a quartz
immersion well, under continuous magnetic stirring. After
evaporation of the solvent, the photomixture was analyzed by
GC/MS.
La ser -Dr op P h otolysis. The beam from a Nd:YAG laser
using the fourth harmonic (266 nm, <10 ns, e16 mJ /pulse)
was focused by means of a quartz lens into a drop of the
photolysis solution suspended from a 2-in. syringe needle (20
gauge). Further details for this experiment have been de-
scribed previously.14
1
,2-diphenylcyclobutane and styrene could be formed
2
0
through nitrogen elimination (Scheme 4). This is also
consistent with the failure to detect oxygen-trapping
products in the photolysis of 19, in contrast with the
observed formation of tetrahydrofuran derivatives in the
two-photon transformation of the dichloride 1 and in the
decarbonylation of the cyclic ketones 8 and 12 in aerated
solutions.
La ser F la sh P h otolysis. These experiments were carried
out using either a Nd:YAG laser using the fourth harmonic
(266 nm, <10 ns, e20 mJ /pulse) or an excimer laser operated
with HCl/Xe/Ne gas mixtures (308 nm, ca. 6 ns, e50 mJ /pulse).
Transient signals were captured with a Tetronix-2440 digital
oscilloscope that was interfaced to a computer that also
controlled the experiment. The system was operated with
software written in the LabVIEW 3.1.1 environment from
National Instruments. Other aspects of this instrument are
similar to those described previously. The two-laser two-color
experiments were performed by sending a trigger pulse to a
delay generator, which then sent TTL pulses which fired the
lasers at the desired sequence. All experiments were carried
out using flow cells constructed from 7 × 7 mm Suprasil quartz
tubing. Samples were contained in a 100 mL resevoir tank
which was purged with a slow stream of either nitrogen or
oxygen, as required.
Finally, the fact that quite different yields of tetrahy-
dronaphthalenes are obtained depending on the starting
substrate and the irradiation conditions deserves a
further comment. Thus, while 6 was a minor product in
the two-photon photolysis of the dichloride 1 or in the
one-photon decarbonylation of the ketone 8, it was
obtained in much higher yield upon high-intensity ir-
radiation of the ketone. This points to differences in the
chemical behavior of biradical 3 linked to the predomi-
nance of different biradical conformations.21 It can be
envisaged that the preferred conformation will be differ-
ent for fragmentation, cyclization, and R to ortho cou-
pling. The nascent biradical could have a lifetime shorter
than that required for rotational equilibration, thus
collapsing by the reaction path associated with the least
motion requirement. The data here obtained suggest that
the formation of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes is fa-
vored when the biradical is initially generated in a
conformation, such as 3b, with a short distance between
the radical terminii.
Ack n ow led gm en t. Financial support by the Span-
ish DGES (M.A.M., Project No. PB97-0339) and by the
Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada
through an operating Grant (J .C.S.) is gratefully ac-
knowledged. E.F.S. also thanks the Spanish Ministry
of Education for a grant. Part of this work was per-
formed when J .C.S. was the recipient of a Killam
Fellowship awarded by the Canada Council.
J O990872N
Exp er im en ta l Section
Syn th esis of 1,4-Dich lor o-1,4-diph en ylbu tan e (1). Prepa-
ration of dichloride 1 was accomplished following a procedure
describe in the literature.
(22) Doering, W. E.; Birladeanu, L.; Sarma, K.; Teles, J . H.; Kl a´ rner,
F. G.; Gehrke, J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4289-4297.
(23) Snider, B. B.; J ackson, A. C. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1471-
2
5
1
474.
(
24) Holland, H. L.; Kindermann, M.; Kumaresan, S.; Stefanac, T.
(
20) This mechanism has been found to operate in a number of cases.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1353-1364
See, for example: Engel, P. S. Chem. Rev. 1980, 80, 99-150. Adam,
W.; Harrer, H. M.; Nau, W. M.; Peteres, K. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
(25) (a) Dodson, R. M.; Zielske, A. J . Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 28-31.
(b) Mikaya, A. I.; Zaikin, V. G.; Finkel’shtein, E. Sh.; Vdovin, V. M.
Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1979, 2221-2226.
(26) Frank, C. E.; Leebrick, J . R.; Homberg, O. J . Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 307-309.
3
786-3797. Simpson, C. J . S. M.; Wilson, G. J .; Adam, W. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4728-4732.
21) Scaiano, J . C. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 819-824.
(