European Journal of Organic Chemistry
10.1002/ejoc.201700451
FULL PAPER
(
1
(
d) Following general procedure A, 1-naphtaldehyde (0.01 mmol, 16 mg),
0 mol% palladium acetate (0.001 mmol, 2.2 mg), 75 mg moleculer sieve
4Å), 0.5 mL cyclohexane, 100 µL CDCl were used at 130 °C. After 12h,
mixture was characterized by GC-MS. No trace of naphthalene-d or d -
- naphtaldehyde were found by GC-MS. Naphthalene yield 51%.
We thank INSA-India (SP/YSP/98/2014) for funding.
Financial support received from CSIR-India (fellowship to
A.M. and S.R.) is gratefully acknowledged.
3
1
1
1
Mercury poison test:
An oven-dried screw-cap test tube containing a stirring bar was charged
with 1-naphthaldehyde (78 mg, 0.5 mmol), Pd(OAc) (11.2 mg, 0.05 mmol),
2
Keywords: deformylation • CO detection • Hammett Plot •
reaction kinetics • DFT calculation
molecular sieves (4 Å) (200 mg), and cyclohexane (2 mL). Then 200 mg
of Hg and 0.5 mmol of n-decane (as internal standard for gas
chromatography) were added to this reaction mixture and the mixture was
stirred in a pre-heated oil bath (130 ºC). The yield of the product was
checked by gas chromatography taking the reaction aliquot at a 4 hour
interval. Up to 24 hour no conversion of aldehyde was observed.
Filtration test.
[1] A. Modak, D. Maiti, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 21-35.
[2] a) T. Morimoto, K. Fuji, K. Tsutsumi, K. Kakiuchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 3806-3807; b) T. Shibata, N. Toshida, K. Takagi, Org. Lett.
2
002, 4, 1619-1621; c) S. D. Friis, R. H. Taaning, A. T. Lindhardt, T.
Skrydstrup, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18114-18117. d) S. K.
Murphy, J-W. Park, F. A. Cruz1, V. M. Dong, Science 2015, 347, 56-60.
e) T. Furusawa, T. Morimoto, N. Oka, H. Tanimoto, Y. Nishiyama, K.
Kakiuchi, Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 406-408.
An oven-dried screw-cap test tube containing a stirring bar was charged
with 1-naphthaldehyde (156 mg, 1 mmol), Pd(OAc) (22.4 mg, 0.1 mmol),
2
[
3] a) T. Patra, S. Manna, D. Maiti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12140-
molecular sieves (4 Å) (400 mg), and cyclohexane (6 mL). Then 1 mmol
of decane (as internal standard for gas chromatography) was added to this
reaction mixture and the mixture was stirred in a pre-heated oil bath (130
ºC). The reaction was stirred for 75 min and yield was measured. Then
the half of the reaction mixture was decanted with micropipette and filtered
through cotton and taken to another reaction tube. Next both half of the
reaction mixtures were put in the pre-heated oil bath (130 ºC). Aliquots
from both the reaction tube were taken at different time and the yields were
measured using gas chromatography. The reaction progress was plotted
against time. The sharp decrease of reaction rate observed in the filtered
part compared (11 times) to the unfiltered part. So, it proves the reaction
nature of the deformylation is predominantly heterogeneous but the
homogenous pathway also exist in lesser extent.
1
2142; b) Y.-B. Huang, Z. Yang, M.-Y. Chen, J.-J. Dai, Q.-X. Guo, Y.
Fu, ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1348-1351; c) J. Mitra, X. Zhou, T.
Rauchfuss, Green Chem. 2015, 17, 307-313. d) Y. Chen, Y. Wu, D.
Hua, C. Li, M. P. Harold, J. Wanga, M. Yanga RSC Adv., 2015, 5,
18673-18701. e) E. N. G. Marsh, M. W. Waugh, ACS Catal. 2013, 3,
2515-2521.
[4] E. Taarning, R. Madsen, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5638-5644.
[5] a) M. C. Bröhmer, N. Volz, S. Bräse, Synlett, 2009, 1383-1386; b)
Akanksha, D. Maiti, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 2314-2320.
6] a) I. Smari, C. Youssef, K. Yuan, A. Beladhria, H. Ben Ammar, B. Ben
Hassine, H. Doucet, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 1778-1786; b) J. Luo, S.
Preciado, S. O. Araromi, I. Larrosa, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 11, 347-350;
c) Z. Ding, N. Yoshikai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8574-8578.
7] O. M. C. J. F. Hartwig, in Bonding to Catalysis, University Science
Books, New York, 2010.
8] J. Hawthorne, M. Wilt, J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 2215-2216.
9] J. Tsuji, K. Ohno, T. Kajimoto, Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 6, 4565-4568.
10] A. Modak, A. Deb, T. Patra, S. Rana, S. Maity, D. Maiti, Chem. Comm.,
2012, 48, 4253-4255.
[11] a) A. Modak, N. Togati, D. Maiti, Chem. Comm., 2013, 49, 252-254; b)
P. K. Kundu, M. Dhiman, A. Modak, A. Chowdhury, V. Polshettiwar, D.
Maiti, ChemPlusChem., doi:10.1002/cplu.201600245
[
[
TEM experiment.
An oven-dried screw-cap test tube containing a stirring bar was charged
with 1-naphthaldehyde (78 mg, 0.5 mmol), Pd(OAc) (11.2 mg, 0.05 mmol),
2
molecular sieves (4 Å) (200 mg), and cyclohexane (2 mL). Then the
reaction mixture was stirred at pre-heated oil bath. After 1.5 hour and 24 h
[
[
[
1
mL of aliquots were taken out. Another 10 mL of cyclohexane was added
to both of these fractions and the organic part was removed through by
decanting off the solvent. In the solid fraction another 10 mL of
cyclohexane was added and stirred for 30 mins and aliquot were taken
from suspension of solid particle to record the TEM images. TEM analysis
shown the formation of palladium nano particles on the molecular sieves.
[12] a) J. Tsuji and K. Ohno, Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 6, 3969-3971; b) J.
Tsuji, K. Ohno, Synthesis, 1969, 157-169; c) D. H. Doughty, L. H.
Pignolet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7083-7085; d) C. M. Beck, S.
E. Rathmill, Y. J. Park, J. Chen, R. H. Crabtree, L. M. Liable-Sands, A.
L. Rheingold, Organometallics, 1999, 18, 5311-5317; e) M. Kreis, A.
Palmelund, L. Bunch, R. Madsen, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2148-
Competition experiment.
A clean, oven–dried screw cap schlenk
reaction tube with previously placed magnetic stir–bar was charged with
molecular sieves (4Å, 150 mg), benzaldehyde (0.25 mmol, 26.6 mg), 4-X
benzaldehyde (0.25 mmol), palladium acetate (8 mol%, 0.04 mmol, 9 mg),
naphthalene (0.25 mmol, 32 mg). Cyclohexane (1.3 mL) was added to this
mixture by syringe. The tube was tightly closed by screw cap and placed
in a preheated oil bath at 130 ˚C. The reaction mixture was vigorously
stirred for in air atmosphere different reaction times, putting the reactions
at different times. Yield was determined by gas chromatography with
respect to benzene as well as with respect to 4-X-benzene, using
naphthalene as internal standard.
2
154; f) P. Fristrup, M. Kreis, A. Palmelund, P.-O. Norrby, R. Madsen,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 5206-5215; g) J. M. Oconnor, J. Ma, J.
Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 5075–5077; f) P. Malcho, E. J. Garcia-Suarez,
U. V. Mentzel, C. Engelbrekt, A. Riisager, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43,
1
7230–17235.
[13] T. Iwai, T. Fujihara, Y. Tsuji, Chem. Comm., 2008, 6215-6217.
[14] G. Domazetis, B. Tarpey, D. Dolphin, B. R. James, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1980, 939-940.
[15] D. Lupp, N. J. Christensen, P. Fristrup, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 11093–
11105. b) N. J. Christensen, P. Fristrup, Synlett 2015, 26, 508–513.
[16] a) T. Iizuka, H. Yamamoto, M. Kotani, T. Yonetani, Biochimica et
Biophysica Acta, 1974, 371, 126-139. b) J. C. Obirai, S. Hamadi, A.
Ithurbide, C. Wartelle, T. Nyokong, J. Zagal, S. Top, F. Bediouia,
Electroanalysis, 2006, 17, 1689-1695.
Computational Details. All the structures were completely optimized
using the hybrid DFT method, labeled as M06 without any symmetry
2
1
constraints.
We have used the relativistic small-core ECP of
2
2
Stuttgart/Dresden (SDD) for the palladium and 6-31+G* basis set for
other atoms as implemented in the Gaussian 09 suite of programs.23
Frequency calculations were performed at the same level of theory to
characterize the nature of the stationary points. All the ground state
structures were verified as minimum by confirming that their respective
Hessian (matrix of analytically determined second order derivative of
energy) is all real while the transition states were characterized as
stationary points with only one negative frequency. The polarized
[
17] a) P. Fristrup, L. B. Johansen, C. H. Christensen, Chem. Commun.
008, 2750-2752. b) C. Engelin, T. Jensen, S. Rodriguez-Rodriguez,
2
P. Fristrup, ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 294−302.
[
18] a) J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1985; b) C. Hansch, A. Leo, R. W. Taft, Chem. Rev., 1991
1, 165-195.
[19] see supporting information.
,
9
2
4
continuum model (PCM) had been employed for the solution phase
calculations using cyclohexane as the solvent. The discussion of the
catalytic cycle involves solvent corrected Gibbs free energies even though
they were also calculated in the gas phase.
[
20] a) J. Cornella, E. G.-Bengoa, R. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
1
997-2009. b) J. A. Widegren, R. G. Finke, J. Mol. Catal. A. 2003, 198,
3
17-340.
[
[
21] Y. Zhao, D. G.Truhlar, Theor. Chem. Acc., 2008, 120, 215.
22] a) M. Dolg, U. Wedig, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, J. Chem. Phys., 1987, 86,
8
66. b) T.H. Dunning Jr., P. J. Hay, Modern Theoretical Chemistry; Ed.
H. F. Schaefer III, Vol. 3 (Plenum, New York, 1976) 1-28.
Acknowledgements
[23] M. J.Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb,
J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, B. M. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H.
Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino,
G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda,
J. Hasegawa, T. N. Ishida,; Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.