pubs.acs.org/joc
Besides the classic general Ullmann,7 Suzuki,8 and Stille9
Glucose as a Clean and Renewable Reductant
in the Pd-Nanoparticle-Catalyzed Reductive
Homocoupling of Bromo- and Chloroarenes in Water
coupling reactions, the Pd-catalyzed reductive coupling of
haloarenes has gained great attention as a useful route to the
formation of aryl-aryl bonds. This simple method for
preparing symmetrical biaryls is of ongoing interest, as it
prevents the use of stoichiometric amounts of expensive or
moisture-sensitive organometallic compounds (i.e., boronic
acids, stannanes, Grignard reagents, etc.).
Antonio Monopoli,*,† Vincenzo Calo,
ꢀ †
Francesco Ciminale,† Pietro Cotugno,† Carlo Angelici,†
Nicola Cioffi,† and Angelo Nacci*,†,‡
†Department of Chemistry and ‡CNR-ICCOM,
Department of Chemistry, Universitaꢀ degli Studi Aldo Moro,
Via Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
This approach may be particularly attractive for industrial
applications provided that it can be carried out in eco-
friendly solvents, employing cheap and renewable raw ma-
terials. From this standpoint, of special interest is the use of
chloroarenes as substrates, safe and clean reducing agents,
and water as the most desirable green solvent. In addition to
that, the use of metal nanoparticles as catalyst is gaining
interest due to the enhanced ability of colloids to transfer
electrons because of the large surface area-to-volume ratio.10
As part of our ongoing program aimed at finding new eco-
efficient synthetic solutions,10a,11 we were attempting to
develop a highly sustainable catalyst system to perform the
reductive coupling of aryl chlorides in water by replacing the
most commonly used reductants, Zn powder, formate salts,
and hydrogen gas, with safer and cleaner reducing agents.
Among these, sugars were thought to be suitable candidates
because they are cheap, inexhaustible base chemicals and
highly soluble in water.
Although several reductive aryl-aryl coupling protocols
have been studied in water,10b,12 no examples have been
reported on the use of sugars as stoichiometric reductants.
Among several monosaccharides, we focused our attention
particularly on glucose, which is known to reduce many
metals in colloidal form smoothly.13
Our investigations started by checking the ability of
glucose to generate catalytically active Pd nanoparticles
(Pd-NPs) in situ. To this end, a series of model reductive
antomono@libero.it; nacci@chimica.uniba.it
Received March 25, 2010
An efficient and highly sustainable Ullmann-type homo-
coupling of bromo- and chloroarenes, including the more
challenging electron-rich chloroarenes (e.g., 4-chloroanisole),
catalyzed by in situ generated Pd colloids, is carried out
in aqueous medium under relatively mild conditions (tem-
peratures ranging from 40 to 90 °C). Glucose is used as a
clean and renewable reductant, while tetrabutylammonium
hydroxide (TBAOH) acts as base, surfactant, and phase-
transfer agent, creating a favorable environment for the
catalyst. Pd nanoparticle sizes, morphology, and chemical
composition are ascertained by TEM and XPS analyses.
(7) (a) Fanta, P. E. Synthesis 1974, 9. See also: (b) Beletskaya, I. P.;
Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2337–2364.
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Alonso, F.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 3047–3101. (b) Phan, N. T. S.; Van Der Sluys, M.; Jones, C. W. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 609–679.
In the past decade, the biaryl scaffold has received inc-
reased attention as a privileged structure by the agrochemical
and pharmaceutical industries.1 The core of many types of
natural products,2 advanced materials,3 polymers,4 sensors,5
and ligands for asymmetric catalysis6 contains the biaryl
moiety. Consequently, the development of new and efficient
methods of synthesizing these structures is crucial to the
work of a broad area of organic chemistry.
(9) (a) Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508. See also:
(b) De Souza, M. V. N. Curr. Org. Synth. 2006, 3, 313–326.
ꢀ
(10) See, for example: (a) Calo, V.; Nacci, A.; Monopoli, A.; Cotugno, P.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1272–1279. (b) Gallon, B. J.; Kojima, R. W.; Kaner,
R. B.; Diaconescu, P. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7251–7254.
ꢀ
(11) (a) Calo, V.; Nacci, A.; Monopoli, A.; Montingelli, F. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6040–6044. (b) Calo, V.; Nacci, A.; Monopoli, A. Eur. J. Org.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Chem. 2006, 3791–3802. (c) Calo, V.; Nacci, A.; Monopoli, A.; Cotugno, P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1–4.
(12) (a) Wan, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Klingstedt, M.; Terasaki, O.;
Zhao, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4541–4550. (b) Wang, H.; Wan, Y.
J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 6553–6562. (c) Li, H.; Chai, W.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.
Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1223–1228. (d) Ram, R. N.; Singh, V. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 7625–7628. (e) Li, J.-H.; Y. Liang, W.-J.; Liu, S.; Tang, Y.; Xie, X.
Chin. J. Chem. 2004, 22, 1432–1435. (f) Li, J.-H.; Xie, Y.-X.; Yin, D.-L.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9867–9869. (g) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Joshi, A. V.;
Peleg, L.; Sasson, Y. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 44–46. (h) Venkatraman,
S.; Huang, T.; Li, C.-J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 399–405. (i) Mukhopadhyay,
S.; Rothenberg, G.; Gitis, D.; Sasson, Y. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 211–214.
(j) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Rothenberg, G.; Wiener, H.; Sasson, Y. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 14763–14768.
(1) (a) Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.; Rossi, R. Synthesis 2004, 2419–2440.
(b) Matheron, M. E.; Porchas, M. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 665. (c) Horton, D. A.;
Bourne, G. T.; Smythe, L. M. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 893–930.
(2) (a) Baudoin, O.; Gueritte, F. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2003, 29, 355–
417. (b) Bringmann, G.; Gunther, C.; Ochse, M.; Schupp, O.; Tasler, S. In
Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products; Herz, W., Falk, H.,
Kirby, G. W., Moore, R. E., Eds.; Springer: New York, 2001; Vol. 82, pp 1-293.
(3) (a) Lightowler, S.; Hird, M. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 5538–5549.
(b) Zhan, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhu, D. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15,
1963–1969.
(4) (a) Kertesz, M.; Choi, C. H.; Yang, S. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3448–
3481. (b) Roncali, J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 711–738.
(5) Mei, X.; Wolf, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13326–13327.
(6) (a) Brunel, J. M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 857–897. (b) Berthod, M.;
Mignani, G.; Woodward, G.; Lemaire, M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1801–1836.
(13) (a) Xu, L.; Wu, X.-C.; Zhu, J.-J. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 305603.
(b) Panigrahi, S.; Kundu, S.; Ghosh, S. K.; Nath, S.; Pal, T. Colloids Surf., A
2005, 264, 133–138. (c) Mayya, K. M.; Jain, N.; Gole, A.; Langevin, D.;
Sastry, M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 270, 133–139.
3908 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3908–3911
Published on Web 05/12/2010
DOI: 10.1021/jo1005729
r
2010 American Chemical Society