S. Aiki et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 696 (2011) 1301e1304
1303
Table 1
Oxidative dehydrogenation of 2a using 1b as a catalyst.
Table 3
a
a
Oxidative dehydrogenation of 2a using 1ae1d as a catalyst.
Yield (%)b
Yield (%)b
Entry
Ru catalyst
Time (h)
Entry
Conditions
Time (h)
1
2
3
1c
1d
1a
1b
1.5
1.5
1
Trace
0
87
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
K
K
K
2
2
2
CO
CO
CO
3
3
3
Air
14
78
89
Trace
10
23
88
31
80
O
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
24
c
N
2
4
1
77
e
O
2
O
2
O
2
O
2
O
2
Na
2
CO
CO
DBU
CO
3
a
The reaction was carried out in 1 mL CD
3
OD with 2a (0.15 mmol), Ru catalyst
Cs
2
3
ꢁ3
(
7.5 ꢂ 10 mmol) and a base (0.15 mmol).
b
c
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using mesitylene as an internal standard.
The data are originated from ref. [3b].
c
8
K
2
3
a
The reaction was carried out in
3
1 mL CD OD with 2a (0.15 mmol), 1b
ꢁ3
(
7.5 ꢂ 10 mmol) and a base (0.15 mmol).
b
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using mesitylene as an internal standard.
The reaction was performed at room temperature.
1
þ0.64 V vs. NHE. H NMR spectra were measured on a JEOL EX-270,
c
a JNM-ECS-400 and a Bruker AVANCE-400 NMR spectrometers.
that the catalytic activity correlates with the RueCl bond length and
the redox potential. The method outlined in this paper is expected to
contribute to the design of catalysts for aerobic oxidative dehydro-
genation. Further studies including an investigation of the reaction
mechanism are in progress.
4
.2. Synthesis of Ru(III) complex 1b
3
[RuCl (tpy)] (200 mg, 0.45 mmol), bhq (163 mg, 0.91 mmol) and
AgPF
6
(184 mg, 0.73 mmol) were dissolved in 2-methoxyethanol
ꢀ
(55 mL) and stirred at 70 C for 12 h. The solution was cooled to
ꢀ
ꢁ
20 C for 1 h and then filtered through Celite to remove the AgCl
precipitate. The filtrate was concentrated to ca. 1 mL. An aqueous
4
. Experimental
NH
4 6
PF solution was added to the concentrate. The resulting
precipitate was filtered off and purified by column chromatography
4
.1. General
(
grade III alumina, acidic, toluene/acetonitrile ¼ 2/1). The green band
was collected and acetonitrile was evaporated. The precipitate was
2
a, methanol-d
4
(Acros), AgPF
6
, 2c, 2d, 2f, 2g, 1,8-diazabicyclo
, Na CO , Cs CO , 2-methoxy-
collected by filtration to give 1b as a green solid (98 mg, 31%). ESI-
[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (Aldrich), K
2
CO
3
2
3
2
3
þ
MS: m/z ¼ 548{M ꢁ PF
O (C28 23ClF
H, 3.52; N, 7.44.
6
} . Anal. Calcd. for [RuCl(bhq)(tpy)][PF
6
]$
ethanol (Kanto Chemical), benzo[h]quinoline, 2b, 2e, and mesity-
lene (TCI) were commercially available and were used without any
further purification. Complexes [RuCl
2H
2
H
6 4 2
N O PRu): C, 46.13; H, 3.18; N, 7.69. Found C, 46.31;
3
(tpy)] [11], 1a [7], 1c [5e], and
1
d [9] were prepared in accordance with the previous literature
methods. Column chromatography was carried out by using
Aluminium oxide 90 active acidic (Merck).
4.3. X-ray crystal structure determination
Elemental analysis was carried out with a PerkineElmer 2400-
CHN instrument. ESI-Mass spectrum was recorded on an Applied
Biosystems QStar Pulsar i spectrometer. Cyclic voltammograms
were recorded on a ALS/CH Instruments Electrochemical analyzer
C
29.5
H
22
N
4
F
6
PClO0.5Ru, M ¼ 722.01, monoclinic, space group C2/
m (No. 12), a ¼ 15.0252(8) Å, b ¼ 24.2483(12) Å, c ¼ 16.4057(9) Å,
ꢀ
ꢁ
3
b
¼ 97.9443(16) , V ¼ 5919.8(5) Å , T ¼ 88(1) K, Z ¼ 8,
3
ꢁ1
D
0
calcd ¼ 1.620 g cm
,
m
¼ 7.412 cm , F(000) ¼ 2888.00, crystal size
1
200A with a PFCE carbon working electrode, a Pt wire counter
electrode and a 0.10 M AgNO /Ag reference electrode in a DMF
N][PF ] as a supporting electrolyte
.30 ꢂ 0.10 ꢂ 0.05 mm. 28552 reflections collected, 6900 unique
3
(R
int ¼ 0.175), R
(I > 2s
(I)) ¼ 0.1089, R (All reflections) ¼ 0.1952, wR2
1
n
solution containing 0.10 M [ Bu
4
6
(
All reflections) ¼ 0.3525, Single crystals of 1b were obtained by the
þ
at room temperature. Fc /Fc ¼ þ0.060 V vs. 0.10 M AgNO
3
/Ag, and
slow diffusion of hexane into its solution in acetone. Intensity data
were collected on a Rigaku R-AXIS Rapid diffractometer with Mo-K
a
radiation. Crystals were mounted on a glass capillary tube. A full
Table 2
matrix least-squares refinement was used for non-hydrogen atoms
a
Oxidative dehydrogenation of 2ae2g using 1b as a catalyst.
ꢁ
except for PF
6
with anisotropic thermal parameters method by
SHELXL-97 program. Hydrogen atoms were refined using the riding
model.
ꢀ
Yield (%)b
4.4. Oxidative dehydrogenation of 4-methylbenzylamine (2a) to 4-
methylbenzonitrile (3a) using 1b as a catalyst (Table 1, entry 2)
Entry
R
Temp. ( C)
Time (h)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
p-MeC
m-MeC
o-MeC
p-MeOC
Ph
6
H
H
6 4
4
a
b
c
d
e
f
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
30
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
24
89
76
83
93
74
72
41
6
H
4
A mixture of 2a (19
m
L, 0.15 mmol), ruthenium complex 1b
CO (21 mg, 0.15 mmol), and mesi-
OD (1 mL) was stirred under
6
H
4
ꢁ3
(
5.2 mg, 7.5 ꢂ 10 mmol), K
2
3
ꢁ
2
tylene (10
m
L, 7.5 ꢂ 10 mmol) in CD
3
p-ClC
p-F CC
6 4
H
2
O (1 atm). After stirring under reflux for 1.5 h, the yield was
3
6
H
4
g
30
24
1
a
determined by H NMR using mesitylene as an internal standard
(89%). The spectral data of the obtained 3a were identical to the
previous literature [12].
The reaction was carried out in
1
mL CD
3
OD with 2 (0.15 mmol), 1b
ꢁ3
(
7.5 ꢂ 10 mmol) and a base (0.15 mmol).
b
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using mesitylene as an internal standard.