enolate with the electrophile, the copper hydride catalysts
are regenerated by reaction of the copper aldolates with a
hydrosilane. High reactivities could be reached with the
proper choice of diphosphine ligand and we were interested
to investigate the performance of NHC ligands in such
catalytic reactions.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (NHC)Copper Complexes 1 and 2
As for the (NHC)CuX complexes, their main drawback
is the mandatory use of an activator such as NaO-t-Bu (1-6
equiv per copper atom).4,5 This permits a halide-alkoxide
exchange on the copper atom which in turn can react with
the hydrosilane to generate the copper hydride active species.
To avoid the use of an activator, variation of the co-ligand
on the metal center was envisaged to design a “ready to use”
copper hydride precursor. The choice of the co-ligand was
made on the assumption that a weak Cu-O bond on the
co-ligand should allow direct activation of the complex to
generate the desired copper hydride catalyst. After several
experiments, we found that dibenzoylmethanoate was an
acceptable ligand (DBM) (Scheme 1). Complexes 1 and 2
could be prepared in high yield by simply reacting the
corresponding (NHC)CuX complex with the potassium salt
of DBMH. Alternatively, a two step “one-pot” procedure
was devised by mixing the imidazolium salt, copper(I)
chloride, DBMH, and 2 equiv of KO-t-Bu in dry THF. The
corresponding DBM complexes were isolated as stable
orange crystalline solids after simple filtration crystallization.
All complexes can be prepared on a multigram scale as air
stable solids except the ones bearing unhindered alkyl- or
benzyl-substituted NHC ligands such as 1c and 2b. In the
latter case, rapid decomposition was observed when the
complex was handled in aerobic conditions both in the solid
state and in solution, and therefore, they were kept in a
glovebox. The structure of (IMes)Cu(DBM) complex 1a was
also confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1).
corresponding Cu-H resonance. Although the resonance for
the corresponding dimer was reported at 2.67 ppm by Sadighi
et al.,3 the presence of the silylated DBM ligand on copper
is presumably responsible for this chemical shift.
Preliminary optimization experiments were carried out on
the reaction of methyl acrylate with cyclohexane carbox-
aldehyde (Table 1) which gave the correponding aldol
adducts after deprotection of the silyl aldolates (NH4F,
MeOH) along with the alcohol 6 arising from the competitive
direct reduction of the aldehyde 3. Various reaction param-
eters were examined such as solvent, temperature, silane,
and the catalyst structure. In all cases, excellent reactivity
was achieved, and we examined the influence of those
parameters on the chemoselectivity and diastereoselectivity
of this reaction. The reaction can be carried out in various
solvents (Et2O, DCM, CH3CN, THF, PhMe) but we found
We were pleased to find that direct activation of the
complex 1b by a hydrosilane afforded the copper hydride
species. This was confirmed by 1H NMR spectra of degassed
solutions of (IPr)Cu(DBM) in anhydrous C6D6 in the
presence of various silanes. In all cases, a sharp singlet
located at 4.46 ppm was observed that was attributed to the
(4) (a) Kaur, H.; Zinn, F. K.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Organometallics
2004, 23, 1157-1160. (b) D´ıez-Gonza´lez, S.; Kaur, H.; Zinn, F. K.; Stevens,
E. D.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4784-4796. (c) Bantu, B.;
Wang, D.; Wurst, K.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 12145-
12152. (d) D´ıez-Gonza´lez, S.; Scott, N. M.; Nolan, S. P. Organometallics
2006, 25, 2355-2358.
(5) (a) Jurkauskas, V.; Sadighi, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 2417-2420. (b) Yun, J.; Kim, D.; Yun, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
2005, 5181-5183.
(6) For intramolecular reductive aldol reaction with a stoichiometric
amount of Stryker’s reagent, see: (a) Chiu, P.; Chen, B.; Cheng, K. F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9229-9232. (b) Chiu, P.; Szeto, C.-P.; Geng,
Z.; Cheng, K.-F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1901-1903. (c) Chiu, P.; Szeto, C. P.;
Geng, Z.; Cheng, K. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4091-4093. For
intramolecular reductive aldol reaction with a catalytic amount of Stryker’s
reagent, see: (d) Chiu, P.; Leung, S. K. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2308-
2309. (e) Chiu, P. Synthesis 2004, 2210-2215. For intramolecular reductive
aldol reactions catalyzed by Cu(OAc)2‚H2O, see : (f) Lam, H. W.; Joensuu,
P. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4225-4228. (g) Lam, H. W.; Murray, G. J.; Firth,
J. D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5743-5746.
Figure 1. Ball-and-stick drawing of 1a. Hydrogen atoms were
omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths and angles: Cu-C(1),
1.861 Å; Cu-O(1), 1.974 Å; Cu-O(2), 1.986 Å; C(1)-Cu-O(1),
136.0°; C(1)-Cu-O(2), 132.5°; O(1)-Cu-O(2), 91.3°.
(7) (a) Deschamp, J.; Chuzel, O.; Hannedouche, J.; Riant, O. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1292-1297. (b) Zhao, D. B.; Oisaki, K.; Kanai,
M.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1403-1407. (c) Chuzel, O.;
Deschamp, J.; Chausteur, C.; Riant, O. Submitted for publication.
6060
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006