E. J. M. Hensen et al.
bly the result of a delicate acid/base balance between sur-
a very promising 90% imine yield with 100% imine selectiv-
ity was achieved by using only 0.08 mol% catalyst with BA
and 1-hexylamine as substrates (Table 5, entry 10).
face gold cations and the Mg Al-HT support.
2
The Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst could be reused without sig-
2
nificant loss of performance (Table 4, entry 10). To establish
To further underpin the superior activities of our Au/
the substrate scope, Au/Mg Al-HT was also applied for the
Mg Al-HT catalysts compared with previously reported
2
x
tandem synthesis of imines from a variety of alcohols and
amines (Table 5). Various kinds of alcohols (including aro-
matic and allylic alcohols) and amines (including aromatic
AuNP catalysts, it would be best to compare the turnover
frequencies (TOF). However, most studies use quite differ-
ent reaction conditions; therefore, we prepared and com-
pared several representative reference AuNP catalysts
under our mild conditions (Tables S2 and S3 in the Support-
Table 5. Tandem oxidative coupling of various primary alcohols and
[
a]
ing Information). Au/Ga Al O has been reported to achieve
3 3 9
amines over Au/Mg
2
Al-HT catalyst.
À1
high activity (TOF=141 h ) as Au/Ga O catalyst in the ox-
2
3
idative esterification of BA under 5 bar O at 363 K, with
2
[4j]
8
5% ester selectivity and 4.2% acetal yield. Under our
Substrate
t
[
Conv.
[%]
Selectivity [%]
[
b]
milder conditions (1 bar O at 333 K) this catalyst exhibited
a TOF of only 1.5 h with 21% ester selectivity, which is
significantly lower than the TOF of 65 h for our optimized
Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst (with over 99% ester selectivity). To
our delight, the Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst can also achieve very
high activity (TOF=238 h ) under 3 bar O at 373 K with
h]
2
1
2
À1
R
R
Aldehyde
Imine
À1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
4-CH
4-CH
3
O-C
-C
6
H
4
n-C
n-C
n-C
n-C
n-C
n-C
6
6
6
6
6
4
H
H
H
H
H
H
13
13
13
13
13
5
5
100
97
77
0
18
5
100
82
95
3
6
H
4
5
4-Cl-C
4-NO -C
-CH=CH
6
H
4
10
12
10
5
5
2
6
H
4
88
<1
0
37
3
>99
100
63
À1
2
C
C
C
C
C
C
6
6
6
6
6
6
H
H
H
H
H
H
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
96
96
46
59
90
9
8% ester selectivity and no acetal formation. Under these
9
C
6
H
5
-CH
2
6
1
1
97
identical conditions, Au/TiO2 and Au/Ga Al O catalysts
showed much lower activity (TOF=18 and 25 h , respec-
tively) with the formation of acetal (ca. 5% selectivity).
From the comparison, it is clear that the Au/Mg Al-HT cata-
lyst can suppress the formation of acetal byproducts, and
previous optimal Au/TiO2 and Au/Ga Al O catalysts are
3
3
9
À1
n-C
n-C
n-C
6
H
6
H
6
H
13
13
13
63
56
0
37
44
100
[
c]
[
d]
0
10
5
[
a] Reaction conditions: alcohol (0.5 mmol), amine (0.5 mmol), n-dodec-
ane (0.1 mmol), and Au/Mg
20 mLmin ), 333 K. [b] Conversions based on alcohol. [c] Benzyl alco-
2
Al-HT (0.5 mol%) in toluene (10 mL), O
2
À1
3
3
9
(
hol (1.0 mmol), 1-hexylamine (1.0 mmol), n-dodecane (0.2 mmol), and
not effective under 1 bar O and mild temperature. Only
2
À1
[4c]
[4n]
Au/Mg
2
Al-HT (0.5 mol%) in toluene (10 mL), O
2
(20 mLmin ), 333 K.
Au/K Ti O
13
and Au/Polymer were previously shown to
2
6
[
(
3
d] Benzyl alcohol (10.0 mmol), 1-hexylamine (10.0 mmol), n-dodecane
be useful catalysts for methyl ester synthesis under 1 bar O2.
Without base additive, Au/K Ti O exhibits a TOF of only
À1
1.0 mmol), Au/Mg
73 K.
2 2
Al-HT (0.08 mol%), solvent-free, O (20 mLmin ),
2
6
13
À1
2
.7 h , whereas the activity of Au/Polymer in the presence
of a soluble base has a TOF of only approximately 4.2 h .
Thus, for one-pot synthesis of methyl esters under 1 bar O2
À1
and aliphatic amines) could be converted into the corre-
sponding imines in high yields. Although several other het-
erogeneous catalysts, such as Mn-containing octahedral mo-
and soluble-base-free conditions, the Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst
5
shows about one order of magnitude higher activity than the
state of the art AuNP catalysts. Similarly, for tandem synthe-
sis of imines under mild and base-additive-free conditions,
[
6b]
[6c]
lecular sieves, Ru hydroxide supported on TiO2, and Pd
[6d]
nanoparticles supported on boehmite nanofibers,
have
been reported to be efficient for this tandem alcohol oxida-
tion/imine formation reaction, these systems require an
excess of amines, relatively high temperatures (above
the Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst has a substantially higher activity
than the previously reported preferred Au/HAP and Au/
2
TiO catalysts.
2
3
63 K), and long reaction times. Significantly, Au/Mg Al-HT
2
is the most active heterogeneous catalysts for the oxidative
tandem synthesis of imines working under mild conditions
without the need for soluble bases. Because stoichiometric
amounts of both alcohol and amine can be used, the product
workup is simplified.
It is noteworthy that higher substrate concentration did
not adversely affect the catalytic performance. We carried
out aerobic BA oxidation at twice the initial BA concentra-
Conclusion
We have shown that the Mg/Al atomic ratio of hydrotalcite
strongly affects the catalytic performance of supported gold
nanoparticles for aerobic alcohol oxidation, the one-pot oxi-
dative esterification of alcohols to methyl esters, and the
tandem oxidative coupling of alcohols and amines to imines.
The tunability of the base properties makes hydrotalcites
ideal supports for optimal gold catalysts for green organic
synthesis under mild and base-additive-free conditions. Our
protocol for tandem synthesis offers considerable advantag-
es over previously reported approaches, including milder re-
action conditions, simpler workup procedure, significantly
higher activity, and reusability of the catalysts with retention
tion and found that the BD yield increased for Au/Mg Al-
3
HT from 72 to 86%. Similarly, for tandem syntheses of
model methyl ester and imine reactions, higher initial sub-
strate concentrations led to higher reaction rates and higher
product yields (Table 3, entries 7 and 8; Table 5, entries 8
and 9). The potential of the Au/Mg Al-HT catalyst is further
2
underpinned by the results for solvent-free imine synthesis;
&
6
&
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!