Dalton Transactions
Paper
Conclusions
We have synthesized and characterized successfully a new het-
erogeneous oxidation catalyst comprising PMo11 and MCM-41.
The BET, FT-IR, and 31P MAS NMR studies show that the struc-
ture of PMo11 remains intact even after supporting on MCM-41
and there exists a strong chemical interaction with the
support. SEM and XRD results show fine dispersion of PMo11
inside the channels of the support. We were successful in
developing an environmentally benign protocol for selective
oxidation of styrene and benzyl alcohol under aerobic
conditions using PMo11 supported on MCM-41. The applica-
bility of the method was extended to different alkenes and
alcohols. In all the cases we found a high TON of >20 500 for
alkenes and >5500 for alcohols. The catalyst separation is very
simple and can be recovered after simple filtration and is reu-
sable as it retains its catalytic performance. In addition, the
advantages of this catalytic system also include good substrate
conversion under solvent free reaction conditions and fore-
most the use of molecular oxygen which make it a greener
alternative.
Fig. 13 SEM images of (a) fresh and (b) regenerated catalysts.
Table 5 Oxidation of different substrates by (PMo11)3/MCM-41
Conversion
(%)
Selectivity
(%)
Substrate
Products
TON
Styrenea
60
55
BA
70
59
22 472
20 599
α-Methyl
Acetophenone
styrenea
Benzyl alcoholb
Cyclohexanolb
Cyclopentanolb
1-Hexanolb
28
22
20
15
BA
90
>99
10 487
8989
8240
5618
Cyclohexanone
Cyclopentanone >99
1-Hexanal >99
a Alkenes, b alcohols, O2: 0.2 mmol TBHP, temp., a 80 °C, b 90 °C time,
a 8 h, b 24 h , catalyst amount, 25 mg.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Department of Science and Technology
(SR/S5/GC-01/2009) and the University Grants Commission
(39-837/2010 (SR)), New Delhi, for the financial support. Ms
Sukriti Singh and Mr Nilesh Narkhede are thankful to DST,
New Delhi and UGC, New Delhi, respectively, for the award of
a research fellowship.
This may be due to the sticking of the substrates on the
surface, although this might not be significant in the reutiliza-
tion of the catalyst.
The SEM images of the fresh and recycled catalyst are
shown in Fig. 13. The surface morphology of the catalyst is
retained after reusing for several cycles. The above study shows
that there is no deactivation of the catalyst after reuse. The
BET surface area and pore diameter of the reused catalyst were
found to be 470.2 m2 g−1 and 3.68 nm, respectively, which are
Notes and references
comparable with the fresh catalyst (surface area: 485 m2 g−1
pore diameter: 3.45 nm).
;
1 (a) B. Z. Zhan and A. Thompson, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60,
2917–2935; (b) N. Mizuno, Modern Heterogeneous Oxida-
tion Catalysis, Wiley-VCH, 2009; (c) T. Fey, H. Fischer,
S. Bachmann, K. Albert and C. Bolm, J. Org. Chem., 2001,
66, 8154–8159.
Oxidation of different alkenes and alcohols
In order to explore the applicability of the method for a selec-
tive aerobic oxidation of alkenes and alcohols different sub-
strates were tried (Table 5). In the case of alkenes, styrene and
α-methyl styrene produced 70% benzaldehyde and 59% aceto-
phenone, respectively. Employing this system, benzylic,
primary and secondary alcohols were oxidized to ketones or
aldehydes at 90 °C with moderate to good conversions and
excellent selectivities. It was observed from Table 5 that
oxidation of secondary alcohol was easier as compared
to primary alcohols. The observed trend was in good
agreement with a previous report.13 It was also observed
that the long chain primary alcohol (1-hexanol) is very less
reactive under the present reaction conditions. In all the cases
we were able to achieve excellent TON for both alkenes and
alcohols.
2 (a) S. L. Regen and C. Koteel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99,
3837–3838; (b) F. M. Menger and C. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1981, 22, 1655–1656; (c) C. Wiles, P. Watts and
S. J. Haswell, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 5261–5264.
3 (a) Y. Ding, B. Ma, Q. Gao, G. Li, L. Yan and J. Suo, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem., 2005, 230, 121–128; (b) M. Li, J. Shen,
X. Ge and X. Chen, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 206, 161–169;
(c) S. Damyanova, L. Dimitrov, R. Mariscal, J. L. G. Fierro,
L. Petrov and I. Sobrados, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 256, 183–
197; (d) G. S. Armatas, G. Bilis and M. Louloudi, J. Mater.
Chem., 2011, 21, 2997–3005.
4 (a) C. L. Hill and C. M. P. McCartha, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
1995, 143, 407–455; (b) L. A. C. Walker and Craig L. Hill,
Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 4016–4026.
5 S. Pathan and A. Patel, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 348–355.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 2512–2520 | 2519