Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
catalysts in acetic acid solvent.12 Using Co(OAc) as a catalyst
under the same conditions as those used in our study, the
conversion of ethylbenzene and selectivity of acetophenone
were only 40.4 and 80.2%, respectively. These results clearly
showed the advantages of the new Co(III) complexes 5–8. When
the reaction temperature was raised to 160 °C, extensive
carbonization occurred. For this reason we chose 150 °C as a
standard reaction temperature for the rest of our study. On
extending the reaction time from 2 to 10 h, both conversion and
selectivity of acetophenone increased initially, then the conver-
sion had no obvious change due to the inhibition of the reaction
by the products and the selectivity of acetophenone decreased
due to the over oxidation to benzoic acid after reaching 90.2%
in 4 h. The effect of product inhibition in the catalytic reaction
was demonstrated by mixing acetophenone with ethylbenzene
(molar ratio 7:3) as starting material and no ethylbenzene
conversion was observed under otherwise identical reaction
conditions.
unsubstituted complex 5. This may be due to the outer spatial
hindrance of octahedral coordination sphere making it some-
what more difficult for the active species to form. On the other
hand, the electronic effects of the substituents may increase
selectivity to acetophenone. For example, 93.2% selectivity for
acetophenone was achieved on 63% conversion using catalyst 6
with methoxyl group on the phenyl ring of ligand 2.
In summary, we have synthesized and characterized trivalent
cobalt complexes containing 2-pyridinecarboxamide ligands
and have found them to be highly effective in the catalytic
oxidation of ethylbenzene to acetophenone with O2 in the
absence of solvent and reducing reagent. This economical and
environmentally friendly system showed excellent potential for
industrial application.
We thank the Hong Kong Polytechnic University ASD Fund
and the University Grants Committee Areas of Excellence
Scheme (AOE P/10-01) for financial support of this study.
On increasing the O2 pressure from 0.8 to 1.8 MPa, the
conversion levels increased from 60.0 to 70.7%. Further
increase of O2 pressure did not show enhancement in conver-
sion. The effect of pressure on the selectivity for acetophenone
was not observed. On increasing the catalyst concentration from
0.5 to 2.0 mmol L21, the ethylbenzene conversion increased
from 43.8 to 70.4% with the increase of acetophenone from 83
to 90%. When the catalyst concentration was higher than 2.0
mmol L21, the over oxidation to benzoic acid became more
significant and the selectivity to acetophenone decreased. Our
further investigation of different substituents on the phenyl ring
of the ligands indicated that the conversions of ethylbenzene
decreased using complexes 6–8 as catalysts rather than the
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data. 6: CoC39H35N6O7, M = 785.66, triclinic, a = 10.0802(16),
b = 13.104(2), c = 14.813(2) Å, U = 1739.1(5) Å3, T = 294 K, space group
P1, Z = 2, m(Mo–Ka) = 0.555 mm21, 11760 reflections collected, 7609
¯
independent reflections (Rint = 0.0395). The final R indices [I > 2s(I)]: R1
= 0.0572, wR2 = 0.0924, R indices (all data): R1 = 0.1039, wR2 = 0.1007.
7: CoC40H39N6O5, M = 742.7, triclinic, a = 13.756(2), b = 15.878(3), c
= 19.388(3) Å, U = 3754.5(10) Å3, T = 294 K, space group P1, Z = 4,
¯
m(Mo–Ka) = 0.509 mm21, 13115 reflections collected, 13115 independent
reflections (Rint = 0.0000). The final R indices [I > 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0601,
wR2 = 0.1433, R indices (all data): R1 = 0.1270, wR2 = 0.1724. Cr. 8:
C36H28Cl3CoN6O5, M = 789.92, monoclinic, a = 15.0628(12), b =
14.7653(12), c = 16.8999(14) Å, U = 3693.6(5) Å3, T = 294 K, space
group P2(1)/c, Z = 4, m(Mo–Ka) = 0.732 mm21, 8381 reflections
collected, 8381 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0000). The final R indices
[I > 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0512, wR2 = 0.1306, R indices (all data): R1 = 0.0826,
cc/b3/b301963b/ for crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic
format.
Table 1 Results of the oxidation of ethylbenzene to acetophenone
1 R. A. Sheldon, Chemtech, 1994, 24, 38; R. Nenmann and M. Dahan,
Nature, 1997, 388, 352; C. L. Hill, Nature, 1999, 401, 436; G.-J. T.
Brink, I. W. C. E. Arends and R. A. Sheldon, Science, 2000, 287,
1636.
2 A. E. Shilov and G. B. Shul’pin, Activation and Catalytic Reactions of
Saturated Hydrocarbons in the presence of Metal Complexes, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2000, p. 371–421.
3 Y. Ishii, S. Sakaguchi and T. Iwahama, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2001, 343,
401; C. Einhorn, J. Einhorn, C. Marcadal and J.-L. Pierre, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 5, 447.
Change of
reaction
Sel (%)c
I
Entry
conditiona
Convb%
II
9.3
III
IV
2.2
3.6
3.9
7.0
7.1
7.0
10.4
11.8
16.5
5.8
7.0
7.6
7.2
2.1
1.9
7.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
120 °C
130 °C
140 °C
150 °C
2 h
4 h
6 h
8 h
49.8
59.0
63.8
70.4
66.5
70.4
70.5
70.8
71.9
60.0
70.4
70.7
70.7
43.8
45.8
70.4
70.3
70.4
70.4
63.3
64.7
64.2
88.0
88.4
88.5
90.2
87.7
90.2
87.7
86.1
81.8
91.4
90.2
90.0
90.2
83.0
85.8
90.2
87.5
87.1
90.2
93.2
91.1
83.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.4
2.6
1.8
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.6
7.5
6.7
1.6
4.4
1.6
1.2
1.5
0.7
2.3
1.6
1.7
2.0
12.2
10.5
1.6
1.3
1.6
1.6
3.2
1.6
2.3
4 E. Boring, Y. V. Geletii and C. L. Hill, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
1625.
5 T. S. I. Murahashi, N. Komiya, Y. Oda, T. Kuwabara and T. Naota, J.
Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 9186.
10 h
0.8 MPa
1.6 MPa
1.8 MPa
2.0 MPa
0.5 mmol/L
1.0 mmol/L
2.0 mmol/L
6.0 mmol/L
8.0 mmol/L
Catalyst 5
Catalyst 6
Catalyst 7
Catalyst 8
6 J. F. Roth, Chemtech., 1991, 21, 357.
7 P. E. Ellis Jr. and J. E. Lyons, Catal. Letter, 1989, 3, 389.
8 L. I. Matienko and L. A. Mosolova, Russ. Chem. Bull., 1997, 46, 658;
L. I. Matienko and L. A. Mosolova, Russ. Chem. Bull., 1999, 48, 55.
9 R. Alcantara, L. Canoira, P. G. Joao, J.-M. Santos and I. Vazquez, Appl.
Catal. A: General, 2000, 203, 259.
10 Z. Q. Lei and Y. P. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 1992, 3, 267; Z. Q. Lei and
Y. P. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 1993, 4, 21.
11 S. Evans and J. R. Lindsay Smith, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2001,
2, 174.
12 T. Maeda, A. K. Pee, D. Haa, JP 7.196573, 1995; T Maeda, A. K. Pee
and D. Haa, Chem. Abs., 1995, 256345.
13 Y. Ishii, T. Iwahama, S. Sakaguchi, K. Nakayama and Y. Nishiyama, J.
Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 4520.
14 W. A. Johnson, T. J. King and J. R. Turner, J. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82,
1509.
15 S. Ernest and S. Hans, Ber., 1926, 59b, 1477.
16 F. A. Chavez, C. V. Nguyen, M. M. Olmstead and P. K. Mascharak,
Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 6282.
10.6
10.8
7.0
3.1
6.6
12.9
a For entries 1–18, catalyst 5 was used. Entries 19–22 were the comparison
of the effectiveness of the four complexes 5–8. Standard reaction
conditions: ethylbenzene = 8 mol L21, catalyst concentration = 2 mmol
L21; O2 pressure = 1.6 MPa; reaction time = 4 h; temperature = 150 °C.
b Conversion of ethylbenzene. c Products were identified by GC (HP 5890
or 4890, column AT-1 30m 3 0.25 mm) using authentic samples for
comparison.
17 T. J. Collins, Acc. Chem. Res., 1994, 27, 279; A. K. Patra and R.
Mukherjee, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 1388.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 1294–1295
1295