1
494
H. T. Cao, R. Grée / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1493–1494
Table 2
ZnBr2 (0.1eq)
Toluene, reflux
O
OH
+
+
DEADH2
4'
Optimization of the amount of catalyst
DEAD
2'
Ph
C2H5
Ph
C2H5
Entry
ZnBr
2
(equiv)
Time (h)
Ketone 3 (yield) (%)
3
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
—
1
0.6
0.2
0.1
48
0.5
0.5
0.75
1
98
96
98
98
96
98
Scheme 2. Reaction with DEAD anchored on Merrifield’s resin.
a
–
At this stage, this reaction does not work with allylic or propar-
gylic alcohols since it leads to complex mixtures of products but
0.05
3
a
9
Under the same reaction conditions, diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD) gives
not to the desired carbonyl compounds.
the ketone 3 in 92% yield.
A final attractive possibility is to use DEAD anchored on a sup-
0
port 2 , since it would offer additional facility for the separation of
0
Table 3
the byproduct which will be the supported DEADH
2
4 (Scheme 2).
Extension to various types of alcohols
This reaction works indeed very well. By using 1 equiv of com-
mercially available DEAD supported on Merrifield resin, the reac-
tion is complete in 1.5 h affording the pure ketone 3 in 95% yield
CO2Et
CO2Et
ZnBr2 (0.1eq)
Toluene, reflux
O
HN
NH
OH
R2
N
N
+
+
10
R1
R2
after filtration and evaporation of the solvent.
R1
EtO2C
EtO2C
4
2
6
In conclusion, these preliminary results demonstrate that cata-
5
2
lytic amounts of ZnBr strongly catalyze the DEAD-mediated dehy-
drogenation of alcohols to carbonyl compounds. Extension of this
methodology is under active study in our group.
Entry
Alcohol 5
Time (h)
Carbonyl derivative 6
yield) (%)
(
1
2
3
4
PhCH
p-NO
2
OH
PhCH
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.5
90
91
92
90
2
2
OH
OH
Acknowledgments
p-MeOPhCH
t-BuCH OH
2
2
We thank CNRS and MESR for financial support. H.T.C. thanks
the Vietnamese government for a PhD thesis fellowship. We
acknowledge Dr. M. Capet, Professor V. Nair, Dr. A. T. Biju, and
Dr. S. Chandrasekhar for very fruitful discussions.
5
2.5
70
N
CH2OH
CH2OH
Cl
6
7
8
2
86
96
98
References and notes
N
Ph
2
CHOH
1.5
4
1. For recent reviews on Mitsunobu reaction see: (a) Dembinski, A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 2763–2772; (b) But, T. Y. S.; Toy, P. H. Chem. Asian J. 2007, 2, 1340–
1355 and references cited therein.
nC4H9
nC8H17
OH
2. Stoner, E. J. In Encyclopedia of Organic Reagents for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L.
A., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, 1995; pp 1790–1793.
3.
(a) Yoneda, F.; Suzuki, K.; Nitia, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 2328–2329; (b)
Yoneda, F.; Suzuki, K.; Nitia, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 727–729.
9
t Bu-cyclohexanol
OH
3.5
98
4. Moriarty, R. M.; Prakash, I.; Penmasta, R. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17, 409–413.
5.
Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry Reactions,
Mechanisms, and Structure, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
6.
This tentative mechanism is based on the simple analogy of the p-system of the
azo group with a carbonyl group. Of course, alternative mechanisms could be
considered as well. For a new DEAD-mediated dehydrogenation of tertiary
amines, see: Xu, X.; Li, X.; Ma, L.; Ye, N.; Weng, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
2
In fact ZnBr is an efficient catalyst since the oxidation of 1 is quan-
14048–14049.
titative even at the level of 5 mol % (entry 6). In the latter case, the
7
.
.
The reaction temperature is also important: by reacting 1 with 0.1 equiv of
ZnBr2 and 1 equiv of DEAD in toluene, the reaction is not complete after 2 days
at 80 °C and the isolated yield in ketone 3 is only 34%.
reaction duration is 3 h only.7
The next step was the extension of this reaction to other alco-
hols and to check its scope and limitations. For that purpose we se-
lected the following standard reaction conditions: DEAD (1 equiv)
8
Representative experimental procedure: To a solution of alcohol 1 (230 mg,
1
(
.7 mMol) in toluene (2.5 mL) are added DEAD 2 (294 mg, 1.7 mMol) and ZnBr
38 mg, 0.17 mMol). The solution is heated under reflux for 0.5 h. After removal
of the solvent under reduced pressure, SiO chromatography easily allows
separation of the ketone 3 (218 mg, 96% yield) and DEADH 4 (287 mg, 96%
yield). Compound 3: R ) d
= 0.57 (pentane/ether: 9:1). 1H NMR: (300 Hz, CDCl
ppm) 7.96–7.25 (m, 5H (HAr)), 3.00 (qd, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H (CH )), 1.21 (t, J = 7.3 Hz,
) d (ppm) 8.2, 31.7, 127.9, 128.5, 132.9, 136.9,
2
with ZnBr
in Table 3.
2
(10 mol %) in refluxing toluene. The results are reported
2
8
2
f
3
Several points are worthy of noted:
(
3
2
2
13
H(CH
3
)) C NMR: (75 Hz, CDCl
= 0.14 (pentane/ether: 9:1) H NMR (300 Hz, CDCl
)), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H (2CH
) d (ppm) 14.0, 61.9, 156.4. All other carbonyl derivatives
3
1
00.8. 4: R
f
3
) d (ppm) 6.62
)).
–
Excellent results are obtained with benzyl alcohol and substi-
tuted derivatives with electron-withdrawing, as well as elec-
tron-donating groups (entries 1–3). A very good yield is also
obtained with a sterically hindered alcohol (entry 4).
The reaction is compatible with heteroaromatic systems such as
pyridine or quinoline derivatives (entries 5 and 6).
It is possible to use it efficiently as well with diaryl- (entry 7) as
well as dialkyl-secondary alcohols (entry 8) or cyclohexyl deriv-
atives (entry 9).
(
br, 2H (2NH)), 4.20 (qd, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H (2CH
2
3
13
C NMR (75 Hz, CDCl
3
have spectral data in agreement with authentic samples and/or with literature
data.
9
.
It is well established that DEAD reacts in ene-type reactions with allylic
derivatives (see Ref. 2). Catalysis of this type of reaction by Lewis acids has
been also reported, see for instance: (a) Brimble, M. A.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 5261–5263; (b) Aburel, P. S.; Zhuang, W.; Hazell, R. G.;
Jorgensen, K. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2344–2349 and references cited
therein.
–
–
10. Another possibility would be the use of DEAD anchored on a fluorous support
since such reagents and their use have been reported recently. See for instance:
–
The reaction is slightly faster on the secondary alcohol 1 as com-
pared to corresponding primary benzyl alcohol: a competition
experiment using a 1:1 mixture of these two alcohols affords a
(
(
a) Dobbs, A. P.; McGregor-Johnson, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2807–2810;
b) Dandapani, S.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3855–3864; (c) Chu, Q.;
Henry, C.; Curran, D. P. Org. Lett 2008, 10, 2453–2456. and references cited
1
.4:1 mixture of ketone 3 and benzaldehyde.
therein.