Inorganic Chemistry
Article
postsynthetic modification method to prepare a new MIL-101
metal−organic framework functionalized with amino and sulfo
groups. This bifunctional catalyst had excellent performance in
the one-pot deacetalization-Knoevenagel reaction.25 However,
grafting acidic and amino groups on the matrix to accomplish
functionalization has several drawbacks. The preparation
process is quite complicated for grafting groups step by step,
and sometimes, a protecting step is needed to avoid self-
assembly,27,28 which increases the preparation steps. For
example, Lee et al. used −NO2, −SO3H as the terephthalate
linkers to prepare MIL-101-NH2-SO3H bifunctional catalyst,
and a reduction step was necessary.27 Alauzun et al.
successfully obtained bifunctional mesoporous materials
through several steps, specifically, a reduction of disulfide
unites and subsequently oxidation to the −SO3H group under
amino groups protection.28 A complex preparation process
definitely hindered their application. Meanwhile, the prepared
catalyst needs to face the risk of inferior catalytic performance
due to the mutual quenching as well as the steric hindrance
effect.29
Fortunately, introducing acidity/basicity metal sources into
the matrix has been regarded as a promising method to avoid
the shortcomings of the synthesis of the acid−base bifunctional
catalysts mentioned above. Fan et al. synthesized a series of
MIL-101(Al/Fe)-NH2(X) catalysts using a rapid reflux
method, where the Al3+/Fe3+ metal clusters reacted as Lewis
acid sites and the amino groups played as Brønsted basic
sites.30 Due to the property of MOFs, such as the high specific
surface area, this method avoided the group protection and
reduced the possibility of acid/base neutralization. Benefitting
from the dual active sites, the functionalized bimetallic catalysts
achieved enhanced catalytic activities in the deacetalization-
Knoevenagel reaction compared to the monometallic catalysts.
The above achievements encourage us to get a new insight
into the acid−base materials, that is, doping acidic or/and
alkali metal species onto high-surface-area support materials.
Notably, the mesoporous silica has several merits that can
satisfy the requirements of “modification”. The higher specific
surface area of the materials guaranteed the good dispersion of
acid/base sites as well as provided abundant room for the
subsequent dispersion of base/acid sites. Therefore, the use of
mesoporous materials to avoid the self-association of metal
particles as well as adjusting the acid−base property has been
highly appreciated.
An alternative route for synthesizing acid−base bifunctional
materials is to incorporate other metal species onto acidic or
alkaline supports. It is well known that doping acidic metal
species (e.g., Al3+, Ti2+, and Zr4+) into the silica skeleton could
prepare the acidic mesoporous silica directly. Meanwhile,
alkaline zeolites could be obtained by inducing basic metal
species (e.g., Ca2+ and Mg2+) into the silicon precursor via the
hydrothermal method, where, due to the high specific surface
area of zeolites, the acidic metal species could be well dispersed
on the surface to avoid the neutralization between acid and
base sites.31
Herein, a facile way to synthesize functionalized mesoporous
material based on metal oxides has been proposed (Scheme 1).
The high surface area of the support circumvented the
interaction between the acid and base sites, and we found
anchoring acid/base species onto the support step by step can
prevent agglomeration to a certain degree. Moreover, using
acidic and alkali metal species rather than grafting organic
acidic and basic groups as the origin of dual sites enabled the
Scheme 1. Synthesis Procedure of Mg-Zr/Ti-HMS-T: (a)
General View of Ti-HMS Skeleton and (b) Morphology of
Mg-Zr/Ti-HMS-T
tailoring of the active sites as well as shortened the preparation
steps. The catalytic performance and robustness of the
fabricated bifunctional catalysts were demonstrated in a one-
pot deacetalization-Knoevenagel reaction, and excellent
reaction results were obtained.
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
2.1. Catalyst Preparation. The Ti-containing mesoporous silica
(Ti-HMS, Si/Ti = 100:1) material was prepared by a sol−gel method
using a customary quaternary ammonium ion template according to
the literature.32−34 The catalysts Mg(Ca)-Zr/Ti-HMS-T were
obtained by a wet-impregnation method. Forty milliliters of
Zr(NO3)4·5H2O (1 mmol) aqueous solution containing Ti-HMS
(1.0 g) was treated under vigorous stirring for 4 h. After removing the
excess water at 70 °C, the sample was calcined at 350 °C for 2 h to get
Zr/Ti-HMS. Afterward, 40 mL of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O or Ca(NO3)2·
4H2O (1 mmol) aqueous solution containing Zr/Ti-HMS was treated
under vigorous stirring for 4 h to form a slurry. Then, the slurry was
dried at 70 °C and the resulting solid was calcined at 550 °C for 5 h to
give the target Mg(Ca)-Zr/Ti-HMS-T catalyst. For convenience, the
prepared samples were named as yMg(Ca)-Zr/Ti-HMS, where “y”
represents the mole ratio of Mg(Ca) to Zr. For example, Mg(Ca)-Zr/
Ti-HMS meant that the mole ratio of Mg to Zr was 1, and the catalyst
was prepared by a two-step wet-impregnation method (Mg-Zr/Ti-
HMS-T). For comparison, Mg(Ca)-Zr/Ti-HMS-O catalysts were
prepared using a one-step method to investigate the mutual
neutralization and agglomeration effects.
2.2. Characterizations. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of the
prepared samples were recorded on a PANalytical X’ Pert
diffractometer using a Cu Kα as a radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å).
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected in an
IRAffinity-1S (Shimadzu, Japan) spectrometer with KBr pellets from
4000 to 400 cm−1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and
high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) measurements were recorded to
observe the morphology of the catalyst on HT-7700 operating at 120
kV. Field emission scanning microscopy (FESEM) images were
recorded on a Hitachi SU-70 microscope equipped with an energy-
dispersive spectrometry (EDS) detector (X-MaxN 80T, Oxford
Instruments, U.K.). The surface chemical composition of the prepared
samples was examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on
a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer using Al Kα
radiation (1486.6 eV). The binding energy of the C 1s peak (BE =
284.8 eV) was used as the reference to calibrate the XPS data. A N2
adsorption−desorption test was conducted on a Micromeritics ASAP
2020 analyzer at −196 °C to examine the specific surface areas, pore
size, and volume of the prepared catalysts using the Brunauer−
Emmett−Teller (BET) method and the BJH method, respectively.
The acid−base property of the obtained materials was investigated by
the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3 and CO2
measurements (AutoChem II 2920, Micromeritics). Thermogravi-
metric analysis was performed on a TGA Q500 V20.13, and the
8925
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 8924−8935