Please donot adjust the margins
In addition, the effect of Ru loading amount was investigated. To be comparable, the same Ru content was used in each reaction entry
(Ru 0.1 mol% of substance). Interestingly, the activity did not increase monotonically with Ru loading amount and showed the volcano
curve with the optimal activity at 2% Ru, indicating that the interaction between Ru and ceria was not the stronger the better. Take 0.5%
Ru/CeO2 for example, when the Ru clusters have strong interaction with ceria, they were highly oxidized (with Ru0-Ruδ+ ratio of 0.23),
as showed by the XPS results. The activity was only less than 1/5 that of 2% Ru/CeO2. On the other side, when the ratio of Ru0-Ruδ+ was
raised to 1.47 (4% Ru/CeO2), the activity showed no further increase but slight decline. To clearly show the influence of Ru0-Ruδ+ ratio,
o
2% Ru/CeO2 was deliberately reduced at temperature as high as 500 C in H2 atmosphere. The Ru0-Ruδ+ ratio was as high as 3.57 and
the conversion dropped to only 28%. Finally, it goes without saying that the particle size of Ru nanoparticles was another key reason for
the catalytic performance.
The high catalytic performance originated from the unique properties of ceria support and the suitable interaction with Ru clusters.
When the Ru clusters anchored with ceria support by Ru-O-Ce, part of them was oxidized to Ruδ+, meanwhile, parts of Ce4+ cations were
reduced to Ce3+ with acidic nature and some oxygen vacancies were also created. Ru0-Ruδ+ clusters over ceria surface with FLPs could
facilitate H2 heterolytic dissociation at low temperatures and Lewis acids can activate aromatic compounds [8, 21-23]. When the
interaction between Ru clusters and ceria was too strong, Ru clusters may be oxidized to a high degree. The reduction of Ru and H2
dissociation was not likely to occur. Conversely when the interaction was too weak, Ru particles would start to grow up and the dispersion
of Ru particles became worse due to shortage of bonding anchoring. More importantly, spilling-over and storage of H in the form of -
OH may be not sufficient to a certain degree due to lacking intimate interfacial interaction by Ru-O-Ce bonding. density functional theory
(DFT) calculations also demonstrated that oxygen vacancies were in favor of the stabilization of hydridic H species in ceria [24]. Both
the high metal dispersion, Lewis acid sites and the abundance of H species by H2 dissociation could enhance the hydrogenation of aniline.
The high selectivity and low condensation side-products can be explained by to the coexistence of solid frustrated Lewis acid-base
pair sites over ceria [7]. For a general acidic support, aniline and cyclohexylamine molecules have strong adsorption on acidic sites [25-
26]. And condensation reaction may take place between the neighboring molecules. However, regarding with ceria, which has a fluorite-
like cubic structure. Each cerium atom possessing the Lewis acid nature is surrounded by the surface and subsurface alkaline oxygen
sites (and even enhanced by oxygen vacancies). This "acidic site isolation" of Lewis acid sites by alkaline sites could effectively suppress
condensation of amines. Similar results also observed in selective hydrogenation of alkynes [17], a low degree of oligomerization of
intermediates was found in the conversion of alkynes to olefins over CeO2.
In summary, the well-tuned Ru/CeO2 was demonstrated as efficient catalyst for aromatic amines hydrogenation with excellent activity
and selectivity. Morphology, electronic and chemical properties of Ru/CeO2 was well were analyzed by using different characterization
techniques. Due to the special chemical nature of Ru/CeO2, the catalyst exhibited good conversion of 95% and selectivity of 99.9%
toward cyclohexylamine. The catalyst also showed superior stability and applicability of other aromatic amines and heteroarenes
containing different functional groups.
Declaration of interest
None
Acknowledgment
This research was financially supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2018453) and the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 91645118 for L.H., 21773270 for G.Z.). Supports from the NSF of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20180249)
are also gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Z. Wei, Y. Li, J. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 815-818.
[2] Z.Q. Liu, X.Y. Wei, F.J. Liu, et al. Fuel 223 (2018) 222-229.
[3] W. Hayazaki, H. Omori, K. Ozaki, JP2002348267A, 2002.
[4] G.Y. Fan, W.J. Huang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 25 (2014) 359–363.
[5] H.Z. Bi, R.F. Dou, H. Wang, et al., Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 32 (2016) 1765-1774.
[6] T. Montini, M. Melchionna, M. Monai, et al., Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 5987-6041.
[7] S. Zhang, Z.-Q. Huang, Y. Ma, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 15266.
[8] M. Garcia-Melchor, N. R. Lꢀpez, J. Phys. Chem. C. 118 (2014) 10921-10926.
[9] B. Ouyang, W. Tan, B. Liu, Catal. Commun. 95 (2017) 36-39.
[10] J. An, Y. Wang, J. Lu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 4172-4181.
[11] N. Ta, J. Liu, S. Chenna, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 20585-20588.
[12] A. Figueroba, G. Kovacs, A. Bruix, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 6 (2016) 6806-6813.
[13] Y. Guo, S. Mei, K. Yuan, et al., ACS Catal.8 (2018) 6203-6215.
[14] F. Wang, C. M. Li, X. Y. Zhang, et al., J. Catal. 329 (2015) 177-186.
[15] Z.-A. Qiao, Z. Wu, S. Dai, Chemsuschem 6 (2013) 1821-1833.
[16] P. G. J. Koopman, A. P. G. Kieboom, H. Van Bekkum, J. Catal. 69 (1981) 172-179.
[17] G. Vilé, B. Bridier, J. Wichert, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 8620-8623.
[18] Z. Mo, Y. Sun, H. Chen, et al., Polymer 46 (2005) 12670-12676.
[19] F. R. Negreiros, M. F. Camellone, S. Fabris, J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 21567-21573.