CATALYTIC METHYLATION OF PHENOL
109
in an ester is only ruptured in the case when the carbon
atom of the alkyl or aralkyl radical has groups that
can stabilize the intermediately formed carbonium ion
[12]. The observed alkylation can be accounted for by
hydrolysis of methyl formate with admixture of water
and by the interaction of phenol under acid catalysis
conditions with CH3OH being formed. However, it
is also probable that the mobility of the methyl group
increases upon adsorption of methyl formate on active
centers of the catalysts and its methylating capacity in
interaction with phenol from the bulk grows.
Under the conditions of alkylation with methanol,
phenol hardly forms any anisole, and meta- and para-
cresols, and the reaction mainly yields ortho-derivatives
of phenol (ortho-cresol and 2,6-xylenol). It can be seen
in the table that, in contrast to the aforesaid, mostly
anisole and a mixture of isomeric cresols are formed
from phenol and methyl formate over RTC at 320°C.
At the same time, similar effects are observed when
phenolisreactedwithmethanolandmethylformate.First,
the reaction selectivity with respect to anisole decreases
with increasing temperature and that with respect to
cresols grows. This relationship is less pronounced
in the case of methyl formate, compared with phenol
alkylation by methanol. Despite this circumstance, the
probability of isomerization of anisole produced in the
interaction of phenol with methyl formate into isomeric
cresols cannot be ruled out. However, a special study is
necessary for confirming this assumption.
It can be seen in the table that the highest activity in
the reaction of phenol with methyl formate is exhibited
by the Pd-HSZ at 320°C. The type of interaction of
phenol with methyl formate differs from that of the
reaction of phenol alkylation by methanol. Primarily,
a noticeable presence of anisole in catalyzates even at
320°C is observed. Under similar conditions, anisole is
formed on the given catalyst from phenol and methanol,
with a selectivity of 18.0%; mixture of isomeric cresols,
with selectivities with respect to ortho-, meta, and para-
isomers of 55.0, 1.0, and 20.0%, respectively; and di- and
trimethylphenols, with a selectivity of 23.0%. In the case
of methyl formate, there no di- and trimethylphenols,
and the isomeric composition of cresols strongly differs
from that specified above (see table).
The reaction duration affects the conversion of
phenol and yields of anisole and cresols similarly for
both the catalysts. Making the reaction longer raises
the conversion of phenol over Pd-HSZ and RTC and,
after 3–4 h, this parameter nearly stabilizes. A similar
behavior is observed in plots describing how the yield of
anisole and cresols depends on the process duration (see
figure). These yields grow as the reaction duration is
raised to 3 h and then, by the fourth hour of the reaction,
the yield of anisole somewhat decreases (by 2.5% in the
case of Pd-HSZ and by 1.5% over RTC), whereas the
yield of cresols remains nearly unchanged.
Comparison of the results obtained for the interaction
of phenol with methyl formate (see table) and methanol
[3] over RTC reveals their noticeable difference:
in alkylation of phenol with methanol at 320°C, its
conversion exceeds by 12.0% that in the interaction of
phenol with methyl formate.
Raising the temperature (>320°C) and the reaction
duration (>4 h) fails to improve the process parameters,
(a)
(b)
Q, %
Q, %
τ, h
τ, h
Effect of the reaction duration τ on (1) conversion of phenol and (2, 3) yields Q of (2) anisole and (3) cresols per reacted phenol.
Conditions: T = 320°C, P = 1.0 MPa. Catalyst: (a) Pd-HSZ and (b) RTC
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 84 No. 1 2011