8408 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 101, No. 45, 1997
Sharma et al.
The reaction of O•- seems to proceed mainly through H
abstraction from the aldehyde group (reaction 14), leading to
the radical 7. This is evident from the peak observed at 310
nm in the transient absorption spectrum. The decrease in the
rate of absorption at 310 nm is ascribed to the attack of radical
7 by OH-. This radical in the presence of high [OH-] leads
to the radical anion 8. The relatively less intense peak at 370
nm is assigned to the addition of O•- to the benzene ring
(reaction 17).
(3) Steenken, S. In Free Radicals in Synthesis and Biology; Minisci,
E., Ed.; Nato ASI Series C-260; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 1989; p 213.
(4) (a) Sonntag, C. v.; Schuchmann, H.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1991, 30, 1229. (b) Sonntag, C. v.; Schuchmann, H.-P. In Peroxyl Radicals;
Alfassi, Z. B., Ed.; Wiley: Chicester, 1997; p 173. (c) Schuchmann H.-P.;
Sonntag, C. v. In Peroxyl Radicals; Alfassi, Z. B., Ed.; Wiley: Chicester,
1997; p 439.
(5) (a) Bhatia, K.; Schuler, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 1356. (b)
Ye, M.; Schuler, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 1898. (c) Chen, X.; Schuler,
R. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 421.
(6) (a) Klein, G. W.; Schuler, R. H. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1978, 11,
167. (b) Kanodia, S.; Madhavan, V.; Schuler, R. H. Radiat. Phys. Chem.
1988, 32, 661. (c) Schuler, R. H. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1992, 39, 105.
(7) Boyland, E.; Sims, P. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2966.
(8) (a) Mohan, H.; Mudaliar, M.; Aravindakumar, C. T.; Rao, B. S.
M.; Mittal, J. P J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1991, 1387. (b) Mohan, H.;
Mudaliar, M.; Rao, B. S. M.; Mittal, J. P. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1992, 40,
513. (c) Mohan, M. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Poona, India, 1993.
(9) (a) Merga, G.; Aravindakumar, C. T.; Mohan, H.; Rao, B. S. M.;
Mittal, J. P. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 597. (b) Merga, G.;
Rao, B. S. M.; Mohan, H.; Mittal, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 9158. (c)
Merga, G. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Poona, India, 1995 (d) Merga, G.;
Schuchmann, H.-P.; Rao, B. S. M.; Sonntag, C. v. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1996, 551. (e) Merga, G.; Schuchmann, H.-P.; Rao, B. S. M.;
Sonntag, C. v. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 1097.
(10) Choure, S.; Bamatraf, M. M.; Rao, B. S. M.; Das, R.; Mohan, H.;
Mittal, J. P. Manuscript in preparation.
(11) Wiberg, K. B.; Stewart, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1786.
(12) Rocek, J. In The Chemistry of Carbonyl Group; Patai, S., Ed.; John
Wiley and Sons: London, 1966; p 461.
(13) Waters, W. A. In Mechanisms of Oxidation of Organic Compounds;
Methuen and Company: London, 1964; p 82.
(14) Stewart, R. In Oxidation in Organic Chemistry, Part A; Wiberg,
K. B., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1965; p 54.
(15) Khudyakov, I. V.; McGarry, P. F.; Turro, N. J. J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 13234 and references therein.
The proportion of the yields of ortho:meta:para isomers of
phenolic products formed in radiolysis of acetophenone in the
presence of 0.1 mM ferricyanide is 0.5:1.3:1 per position (Table
2). When 0.2 mM IrCl62- was used as the oxidant, the G value
of the ortho isomer was enhanced from 0.6 to 2.0, giving a
proportion of 1.6:1.3:1 per position for ortho, meta, and para
isomers, respectively, with the total phenolic yield (G ) 4.1)
corresponding to 75% OH yield. IrCl62-, being a stronger
•
oxidant than Fe(CN)63-, must be able to oxidize all the OH
adducts formed from its attack. The other two possible
channels, i.e., addition to the ipso carbon and the functional
group -COCH3, together should account for the remaining 25%
•
•OH yield. Assuming that the extent of OH attack at these
two positions is equally likely, the proportion of the yields of
ortho:meta:para:ipso:exo (1.6:1.3:1:1.1:1.1) indicates that there
•
is not much preference for OH addition to any of these
positions. It seems that the formation of the exocyclic OH
adduct of acetophenone compared to benzaldehyde is hindered
owing to the bulky -COCH3 group.
(16) Hayon, E.; Ibata, T.; Lichtin, N. N.; Simic, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1972,
76, 2072.
Conclusions
(17) Neta, P.; Schuler, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1056.
(18) Brede, O.; Helmstreit, W.; Mehnert, R. Z. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig)
1975, 256, 513.
(19) Pribush, A. G.; Brusentseva, S. A. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1980, 16,
277.
(20) Solar, S.; Getoff, N.; Holeman, J.; Sehested, K. J. Phys. Chem.
1995, 99, 9425.
•
The OH addition to the functional group of benzaldehyde
seems to predominate over addition to the benzene ring, leading
to the formation of the exocyclic OH adduct, while addition to
the ring is predominant in the case of acetophenone. Benzoic
•
•-
acid is a major product formed in both the OH and SO4
reactions, and its formation has been explained by dispropor-
tionation of the exocyclic OH adduct. The major reaction
pathway for the reaction of O•- with benzaldehyde is by H
abstraction from the aldehyde group, while addition to the ring
predominates in the case of both the ketones. This study
demonstrates the usefulness of radiation chemical methods in
the elucidation of the oxidation reaction mechanism of aromatic
aldehydes.
(21) Guha, S. N.; Moorthy, P. N.; Kishore, K.; Naik, D. B.; Rao, K. N
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Chem. Sci. 1987, 99, 261.
(22) Panajkar, M. S.; Moorthy, P. N.; Shirke, N. D. BARC Rep. 1988,
1410.
(23) (a) Fielden, E. M. In The Study of Fast Processes and Transient
Species by Electron Pulse Radiolysis; Baxendale, J. H., Busi, F., Eds.;
Reidel: Dordrecht, 1981; p 49. (b) Buxton, G. V.; Stuart, C. R. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 279.
(24) Shevchuk, L. G.; Zhikarev, V. S.; Vysotskaya, N. A. J. Org. Chem.
USSR5 1969, 1655.
(25) Wilson, R. L.; Greenstock, C. L.; Adams, G. E.; Wageman, R.;
Dorfman, L. M. Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1971, 3, 211.
(26) Neta, P.; Dorfman, L. M. AdV. Chem. Ser. 1968, 81, 222.
(27) Vieira, A. J. S. C.; Steenken, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4138.
(28) Neta, P.; Madhavan, V.; Zemel, H.; Fessenden, R. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 163.
(29) Land, E. J. Proc. R. Soc. A 1968, 305, 457.
(30) Dorfman, L. M.; Taub, I. A.; Harter, D. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1964,
41, 2954.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Professor M. S. Wadia
and Dr. M. G. Kulkarni for their useful suggestions. S.B.S. is
also thankful to the Nuclear Science Centre and the University
Grants Commission, New Delhi for providing financial as-
sistance. This work is partly supported by Board of Research
in Nuclear Sciences.
(31) (a) In CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Weast, R. C.,
Ed.; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1978; p D-193. (b) Wardman, P. J.
Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1989, 18, 1637.
References and Notes
(32) Fang, X.; Pan, X.; Rahmann, A.; Schuchmann, H.-P.; Sonntag, C.
v. Chem.sEur. J. 1995, 1, 423.
(33) Buxton, G. V.; Langan, J. R.; Smith, J. R. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1986,
90, 6309.
(1) Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. J.
Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513 and references therein.
(2) Neta, P.; Huie, R. E.; Ross, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1980,
17, 1041.