4178
M. J. Bassindale et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 4175–4179
4. (a) Simpkins, N. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990, 19, 335; (b) Cox,
P. J.; Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 1;
(c) Koga, K. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1487.
5. (a) Shiria, S.; Sato, D.; Aoki, K.; Tanaka, M.; Kawasaki,
H.; Koga, K. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 5963; (b) Aoki, K.;
Tomioka, K.; Noguchi, H.; Koga, K. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 13641.
6. Shirai, R.; Aoki, K.; Sato, D.; Kim, H.-D.; Murakata, M.;
Yasukata, T.; Koga, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 690.
7. (a) Saravanan, P.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
167; (b) de Sousa, S. E.; O’Brien, P.; Poumellec, P. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1483; (c) Curthbertson,
E.; O’Brien, P.; Towers, T. D. Synthesis 2001, 693.
8. (a) Tokunaga, M.; Larrow, J. F.; Kakiuchi, F.; Jacobsen,
E. N. Science 1997, 277, 936; (b) Schaus, S. E.; Brandes, B.
D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.; Hansen, K. B.; Gould,
A. E.; Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 1307.
Figure 3.
Moving to examine the more complex system of a
potentially tridentate ligand (e.g., as would be possible
with the use of amines 6–9), we chose to incorporate
only one ligand onto the magnesium centre, to minimise
any possible steric influences. Based on this, model
complex 33 was constructed, which contains a mor-
pholine-based side arm and a methyl group as the sec-
ond anion on Mg (Fig. 3). Upon geometry optimisation
of 33 it was found that the additional oxygen chelation
is not possible, with the ligand preferring to undergo
donation exclusively through the nitrogen atom. Finally,
a comparative calculation was carried out using complex
34 to investigate the stability of the eight-membered ring
chelate (Fig. 3). Comparing isomers 33 and 34 we see an
increase in energy for the eight-membered chelate of
+9.98 kcal/mol, indicating that the former would be
significantly more stable.
9. All amines prepared exhibited satisfactory analytical and
spectral data.
ꢀ
ꢀ
10. Anderson, J. D.; Garcıa Garcıa, P.; Hayes, D.; Hender-
son, K. W.; Kerr, W. J.; Moir, J. H.; Fondekar, K. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7111.
11. Representative experimental procedure: To a Schlenk
flask, under N2, was added Bu2Mg (0.97 M, 1.03 mL,
1.00 mmol, in heptanes) and the heptanes removed in
vacuo. A solution of (1R)-N-[(1R)-1-phenylethyl]-1-phen-
yl-2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethanamine
(R,R)-4
(617 mg,
2.00 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was then added. The solution
was heated to reflux for 90 min, under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere, then cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC and then DMPU (60 lL,
0.5 mmol) and TMSCl (0.5 mL, 4 mmol) added. After
stirring for 20 min, a solution of 4-tert-butylcyclohexanone
15 (123 mg, 0.8 mmol, in 2 mL THF) was added over 1 h,
via a syringe pump. The resulting solution was allowed to
stir for a further 15 min at ꢀ78 ꢁC (overall reaction time
1.25 h) and was then quenched by the addition of
saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (5 mL). After warming to rt,
the reaction was extracted with Et2O (40 mL) and washed
with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2 · 20 mL). The com-
bined aqueous phase was then extracted with Et2O
(2 · 20 mL) and the combined organics dried over Na2SO4
and the solvent removed in vacuo to yield the crude
product. The reaction conversion was determined as 90%
by GC analysis [CP SIL 19CB fused silica capillary
column; carrier gas H2 (80 kPa); 45 ꢁC (1 min)–190 ꢁC;
temperature gradient: 45 ꢁC/min]; tR ¼ 3:27 min (15);
tR ¼ 3:68 min (16)]. The crude product was then purified
by flash silica column chromatography (eluting with
petroleum ether) to afford the desired product (R)-16 as
a clear, colourless oil (130.6 mg, 72%).1 The enantiomeric
ratio was determined by chiral GC analysis to be 7:93
((S):(R)) {Chirasil-DEX CB capillary column; carrier gas
H2 (80 kPa); 70 ꢁC (1 min)–130 ꢁC; temperature gradient:
1.7 ꢁC/min; tR ¼ 39:20 [(S)-16]; tR ¼ 39:53 min [(R)-16]}.
12. For a comparison with Li base systems, see: (a) Aoki, K.;
Koga, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 571; (b) Graf,
C.-D.; Malan, C.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 3014; (c) Graf, C.-D.; Malan, C.; Harms, K.;
Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5581; (d) Busch-
Petersen, J.; Corey, E. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6941.
13. (a) The Gaussian 98 series of programs were used for the
calculations: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.;
Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels,
A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli,
C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G.
In summary, a range of chiral amines with the potential
for chelation were targeted and prepared. These were
subsequently tested as their Mg-bisamides within
asymmetric deprotonation reactions and found to be
effective chiral bases that display the highest general
selectivity yet found within these systems. Furthermore,
even in the absence of donor additives, high reactivities
and selectivities were retained. Computational studies
on model compounds support the formation of the
doubly chelated complexes containing a pair of five-
membered chelate rings. However, these calculations
indicate that tridentate chelation to a magnesium centre
is precluded due to conformational constraints within
the ligands and complexes studied.
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Strathclyde for a University
Studentship (J.J.C.). We also thank the EPSRC for a
grant (GR/M12711; M.J.B.), and the EPSRC Mass
Spectrometry Service, University of Wales, Swansea, for
analyses.
References and notes
1. Henderson, K. W.; Kerr, W. J.; Moir, J. H. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 4573.
2. Henderson, K. W.; Kerr, W. J. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7,
3430.
3. (a) Carswell, E. L.; Hayes, D.; Henderson, K. W.; Kerr,
W. J.; Russell, C. J. Synlett 2003, 1017; (b) Yong, K. H.;
Taylor, N. J.; Chong, J. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3553; (c)
Yong, K. H.; Chong, J. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4139.