1408
M. Subileau et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1854 (2015) 1400–1411
I231, and P429. Indeed, even if CpLIP2 and CAL-A belong to the same su-
perfamily and have significant sequence and structure homologies, only
CpLIP2 exhibits an exceptional alcoholysis activity in biphasic aqueous
media [23]. With the aim to better understand this acyltransferase reac-
tion specificity, we chose to substitute the selected residues of CpLIP2 for
the corresponding amino-acids of the CAL-A structure. Five mutants
were thus built: A333E, V213P, I231F, P429F and a double mutant
I231F/P429F.
the specific hydrolysis activity on ethyl oleate and an increase of 43%
of the specific hydrolysis activity on ethyl laurate, compared to CpLIP2.
With the methanol concentrations tested, no significant change in the
transesterification ratios was observed. Yet, additional experiments
with various primary and secondary alcohols have shown that the
I231F mutation in CpLIP2 provoked a significant change in the acyl ac-
ceptor specificity (Fig. 7). Indeed, while the transesterification ratios ob-
tained with CpLIP2 and the other mutants were comparable for primary
and secondary alcohols for a same relative thermodynamic activity
(aalcohol / [aalcohol + aw], see [23]), the I231F mutation induced a strong
decrease of the transesterification ratios obtained with the secondary
and branched alcohols (isobutanol, propan-2-ol, butan-2-ol, pentan-3-
ol; Fig. 7). This mutation thus induces selectivity toward the acyl accep-
tor, with a final profile similar to that of the AflaL0 lipase described in a
previous work [23]. Besides, the specificity profile on saturated ethyl es-
ters was also modified by the I231F mutation in favor of shorter acyl
chains (Fig. 6). Indeed, the highest specificity constant was still obtained
with C12 ethyl ester, but C8 and C10 were also preferential substrates
(1/α higher than 0.8) (Fig. 6). The replacement of an isoleucine with a
phenylalanine residue at this position does not change the global hydro-
phobicity, but the lower flexibility of phenylalanine finally appears
(i) unfavorable to bulky alcohols as acyl acceptor and (ii) advantageous
for short chain esters as acyl donors. On the CpLIP2 3D model, the posi-
tion of I231 appears indeed critical for the access of the substrates to the
active site (Fig. 4B1). In Fig. 4A, a clash between the phenylalanine (mu-
tation I231F) and the C16 lipid substrate docked in the CpLIP2 3D model
is even visible, but this mutation probably induces structural rearrange-
ments which are not observable on this 3D model.
CAL-A_F431 has been described as a crucial component for the activ-
ity of CAL-A, playing the role of a hydrophobic bottleneck at the entrance
of the substrate tunnel that could limit the range size of the substrates
[86,88]. In CpLIP2, the P429F mutation allows the production of a func-
tional enzyme that exhibited a loss of specific hydrolysis activity of 87%
on ethyl oleate and of 25% on ethyl laurate. The specific activities of the
double mutant enzyme I231F/P429F were in the same range as that of
the single P429F mutant (Table 1). In the presence of methanol, the
transesterification activity of the P429F mutant was inferior to that of
the wild type CpLIP2, with respectively transesterification ratios of 58%
and 74% in the presence of 0.3 M methanol (Fig. 5). The I231F/P429 dou-
ble mutant has an intermediary behavior with a transesterification ratio
of 66% in the presence of 0.3 M methanol (Fig. 5). With other primary
and secondary alcohols, the acyltransfer activity of P429F was compara-
ble to that of CpLIP2 but the double mutant I231F/P429F exhibited the
same catalytic specificity toward linear acyl acceptors as I231F. The
P429F mutation induced an inversion of preference for C10 instead of
C12 ethyl ester in competitive conditions, and a slight increase of the
specificity constant for C8 (Fig. 6). The double mutant enzyme exhibited
a specificity profile comparable to that obtained with the I231F mutation
(Fig. 6). In P429F, the replacement of a small proline into a large hydro-
phobic phenylalanine was expected to have a more important effect on
substrate specificity. It appears that the main consequence was in fact
an important decrease of the specific activity, maybe because, like in
CAL-A, the phenylalanine residue creates a bottleneck that limits the ac-
cessibility of the substrate to the active site. In the CpLIP2 3D model, P429
does not appear to be in direct contact with the lipid substrate (Fig. 4)
but it is located at a possible entry of the active site, in contact with the
lid (Fig. 3A and D). Its location on the lid-like C-terminal flap could also
play a role in the interfacial activation of the enzyme, and again on the
access of the substrate to the active site.
The A333E mutation, located just after the catalytic acid, appeared
quite challenging, with the change of a small hydrophobic residue into
a large acidic one. However, this mutation allowed the production of
an active protein which, compared to CpLIP2, exhibited losses of 73%
and 49% of specific hydrolysis activity on ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate,
respectively. No modification of the specificity profile on saturated sub-
strates could be observed, but the A333E mutation induced a decrease
of the transesterification ratio (Fig. 5). Indeed, in the presence of 0.3 M
methanol, alcoholysis catalyzed by the A333E mutant represented only
45% of the total activity against 74% with CpLIP2. The A333 is situated
just at the entrance of the active site, and is in contact with the solvent
(Fig. 3A). The presence of an alanine residue at this position is thus favor-
able to the reaction with acyl acceptors less polar than water. It is possi-
ble that, in CAL-A, the acidic character of this residue favors the
positioning of water molecules in the vicinity of the active site by activa-
tion of the attacking water molecule as suggested by Jiang et al. [85].
Looking at the other lipases and lipases/acyltransferases of this family
characterized in the same conditions [22,23], CpLIP2, which exhibits
the best acyltransferase property, is the only one that possesses an ala-
nine at this position. AflaL0, which catalyzes low acyltransfer reaction,
possesses a glutamic acid like CAL-A [23]. Interestingly, the two other
acyltransferases CtroL0 and CaLIP4 have a glutamine at this position, a
polar but not charged residue, less favorable to water than the acid but
still more polar than alanine. However, this position is not the only one
involved in the acyltransferase character of CpLIP2 as CtroL0, CaLIP4
and the A333E mutant all display a superior transesterification ratio
than CAL-A, as shown in Fig. 5A.
The V213P mutation, at a distance of 5 Å to the catalytic S180, is in
contact with the lid (Fig. 3C) and the lipid substrate (Fig. 4). The
corresponding CAL-A_P215 is supposed to play a role in the positioning
of the acyl moiety of the substrate [88]. If this mutation in CpLIP2
did not induce a significant change in the reaction specificity (the
transesterification ratios are comparable to that of CpLIP2, data not
shown), the loss of specific hydrolysis activity on ethyl oleate was only
of 43%. More surprisingly, the V213P mutation allowed an 84% increase
of the specific hydrolysis activity on ethyl laurate. In addition the speci-
ficity profile of the V213P mutant on saturated ethyl esters also differed
from that of CpLIP2 (Fig. 6A and C). The specificity constants show that
the V213P mutant has a preference for shorter acyl chains than CpLIP2,
with a specificity toward C10 (preferred substrate) and C8 ethyl esters
(1/α of 0.78 compared to 0.40 obtained with CpLIP2). Thus, the substitu-
tion of the valine of CpLIP2 into the proline of CAL-A induced the produc-
tion of a mutant enzyme with unique specificity profile compared to
CpLIP2 or CAL-A (Fig. 6). This confirms that this area plays a role in the
substrate specificity of the enzyme. On the CpLIP2 3D model, V213 ap-
pears at the entry of a hydrophobic valley (Fig. 3C) that could indeed
welcome fatty acid chains in a more open conformation of the enzyme.
It is also the only mutated residue that can be seen from the “hydrophilic
side” of the enzyme (Fig. 3B).
Finally, the two additional mutations I231F and P429F were chosen
because these residues are positioned at a possible entry of the active
site, in the lid for I231 (Figs. 3 and 4). Moreover, the corresponding res-
idues in CAL-A (CAL-A_F233 and CAL-A_P431, respectively) have al-
ready been described as playing a role in the substrate specificity of
CAL-A [86,88,89]. CAL-A_F233 has been described as a hot spot in CAL-
A, especially for enhancement of the substrate cavity space and of
the enantioselectivity [86,88,89]. The CpLIP2 mutation I231F allowed
the production of a functional enzyme that exhibited a loss of 46% of
Finally, apart from the A333E mutation that induced an important
loss of the transesterification activity compared to CpLIP2, the substitu-
tions of CpLIP2 residues for those of CAL-A did not convert the specific-
ities of CpLIP2 into those of CAL-A. They induced some changes in
substrate specificity, particularly with the V213P and I213F mutations
that are the closest to the docked substrates (Fig. 4), but the profiles ob-
tained were different from those of CpLIP2 or CAL-A. Logically, the