INFLUENCE OF LIME-CONTAINING ADDITIVES ON THE THERMAL BEHAVIOUR OF AMMONIUM NITRATE
sively from 180 to 300°C and NO2 from 350 to 480°C
for the blend with MgCO3, and from 350 to 550°C for
the blend with Kurevere dolomite, indicate that AN
reacts with MgCO3 to a limited extent according to
limestone samples, because MgCO3 is thermodynam-
ically less reactive towards AN than CaCO3.
Acknowledgements
2NH4NO3+MgCO3®
Mg(NO3)2+2NH3+CO2+H2O
This work was partly supported by Estonian Science of
Foundation (G7548).
(8)
with the following decomposition of Mg(NO3)2 at
higher temperatures.
References
Emission of NO was fixed only when using
MgCO3, but not Kurevere dolomite (Fig. 6). The
peaks characteristic to CO2 could be observed on the
FTIR spectra of AN blend with Kurevere dolomite
being most intensive at 730°C (Table 3) indicating to
the decomposition of unreacted carbonates.
So, the proof of AN reaction with carbonates in dolo-
mite was even more solid and obvious than in the case
of limestone. The FTIR analysis of the gaseous com-
pounds evolved at the thermal treatment of AN
with 10–20 mass% of limestone–dolomite additives
showed analogues, but less expressed tendencies.
1 International Fertilizer Industry Association’s Public
Statistics 2005 (http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/statistics.asp).
2 How to make nutrients work effectively, Fertilizer
International, 388 (2002) 390.
3 C. Carranca, A. de Varrannes and D. E. Rolstone,
Eur. J. Agron., 11 (1999) 145.
4 R. P. Udawatta, P. P. Motavalli, H. E. Garrett and
J. J. Krstansky, Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 117 (2006) 39.
5 R. Antikainen, R. Lemola, J. I. Nousianen, L. Sokka,
M. Esala, P Huhtanen and S. Rekolainen,
Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 107 (2005) 287.
6 H. Koponen, C. Escudé-Duran, M. Maljanen, J. Hytönen
and P. J. Martikainen, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38 (2006) 1779.
7 K. Lampe, K. Dittert, B. Sattelmacher, M. Wachendorf,
R. Loges and F. Taube, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38 (2006) 2602.
8 M. Maeda, B. Zhao, Y. Ozaki and T. Yoneyama,
Environ. Pollut., 121 (2003) 477.
Conclusions
There was no considerable systematic dependence of
the temperatures of the ANVI«ANV«ANIV«
ANIII«ANII«ANI phase transitions on the
5–20 mass% of limestone or dolomite additives, but
depending on the type and amount of additive, the
melting point and the decomposition temperature of
AN were shifted 1.5–2 and 8–45°C towards higher
temperatures. If the amount of additives was
20 mass% or more, the ANIV«ANII phase transition
instead of ANIV«ANIII«ANII occurred, and at mole
ratio of AN/(CaO+MgO)=2:1 an endoeffect instead
of exoeffect was fixed on DTA curve. All the samples
with lime-containing additives exhibited the endo-
therms on the DTA curves in the temperature range of
decomposition of Ca(NO3)2 or Mg(NO3)2, suggesting
the possibility of their formation during decom-
position of AN.
The results of analysis of the gaseous com-
pounds evolved during thermal treatment of neat AN
indicated to some differences in the decomposition of
AN in air and N2. The thermal treatment experiments
of AN blends with CaCO3, MgCO3, limestone and do-
lomite samples suggest that with blends the decompo-
sition of AN proceeds through a completely different
mechanism – depending on the origin and the content
of additives, partially, or completely, through the for-
mation of Mg(NO3)2 and Ca(NO3)2 which decompose
at 370–630°C. The AN reaction with MgCO3, and do-
lomite samples was not as complete as with CaCO3 or
9 R. Fernádes-Escobar, M. Benlloch, E. Herrera and
J. M. García-Novelo, Hort. Sci. 101 (2004) 39.
10 G. Kutra and R. Aksomaitiene, Eur. J. Agron., 20 (2003) 127.
11 S. S. Mahli, M. Nyborg and J. T. Harapik, Soil Till. Res.,
48 (1998) 91.
12 J. C. Oxley, J. L. Smith, E. Rogers and Ming Yu,
Thermochim. Acta, 384 (2002) 23.
13 J. Sun, Z. Sun, Q. Wang, H. Ding, T. Wang and C. Jiang,
J. Hazard. Mater., 127 (2005) 204.
14 E. Kestilä, M. E. E. Harju and J. Valkonen,
Thermochim. Acta, 214 (1993) 67.
15 J. C. Oxley, S. M. Kauchik and N. S. Gilson,
Thermochim. Acta, 153 (1989) 269.
16 M. Olszak-Humienik, Thermochim. Acta, 378 (2001) 107.
17 S. Zeman, P. Kohlíºek and A. Maranda, Thermochim. Acta,
398 (2003) 185.
18 P. N. SimÞes. L. M. Pedroso, A. A. Portugal and
J. L. Campos, Thermochim. Acta, 319 (1998) 55.
19 A. O. Remya Sudhakar and S. Mathew, Thermochim. Acta,
451 (2006) 5.
20 K. R. Brower, J. C. Oxley and M. Tewari, J. Phys. Chem.,
93 (1989) 1029.
21 J. Madarász, P. P. Varga and G. Pokol, J. Anal. Appl.
Pyrolysis, 79 (2007) 475.
22 C. Ettarh and A. K. Galwey, Thermochim. Acta,
288 (1996) 203.
23 NIST Chemistry Webbook Standard Reference Database,
No. 69, June 2005 Release
(hhtp://www.webbook.nist.gov/chemistry).
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-007-8769-1
J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 92, 2008
221