one step.19 Unfortunately, when we applied this procedure to 1
we only obtained 3 in 40-50% yield, which is much lower
than the 91% yield for the two-step procedure. Aldehyde 3
crystallizes as the dimer, but slowly equilibrates in aqueous
solution to form the monomer. Contrary to the unprotected
aldoses, aldehyde 3 is easy to dissolve in pure diglyme. Again,
it was not possible to conduct the decarbonylation with an in
situ generated catalyst from RhCl3‚3H2O and dppp since this
experiment only led to precipitation of rhodium metal. However,
when aldehyde 3 was submitted to 2% of Rh(dppp)2Cl, clean
decarbonylation occurred into 1,2-O-isopropylidene-â-L-threo-
furanose (4). Subsequent removal of the acetal then afforded
L-threose in an overall yield of 71% from D-glucose. L-Threose
is a syrup and exists as an almost equal mixture of the R- and
the â-anomer together with a small amount of the hydrate of
the aldehyde.
SCHEME 1
In conclusion, we have developed a catalytic procedure for
decarbonylation of unprotected and partially protected carbo-
hydrate aldehydes. This transformation will open new possibili-
ties for using carbohydrates as chiral starting materials in
synthetic chemistry.
while the yields with galactose and N-acetylglucosamine were
lower. Galactose is less soluble in diglyme-DMA than the other
aldoses while N-acetylglucosamine is known to decarbonylate
5
slowly due to coordination with the N-acetyl group. The long
Experimental Section
reaction time and the high temperature did result in some
decomposition of N-acetylglucosamine during the course of the
reaction. In all cases, however, the addition of pyridine gave a
faster transformation and made it possible to use slightly less
of the rhodium catalyst. As in the case of the initial experiments
with glucose, the major byproducts were Cn-1 1,4-anhydroaldi-
tols. For example, 1,4-anhydro-D-arabinitol was isolated in 20%
yield from the experiment in entry 8 while 1,4-anhydro-5-deoxy-
L-arabinitol was obtained in 17% yield from the reaction in
entry 10.
General Procedure for Decarbonylation of Unprotected
Aldoses. To the aldose (400-650 mg, 2.78 mmol) were added Rh-
2
dppp) Cl (214 mg, 0.22 mmol), DMA (3 mL), diglyme (20 mL),
and freshly distilled pyridine (14.5 µL, 0.18 mmol). The mixture
was thoroughly degassed under high vacuum and then stirred at
reflux (162 °C) under a nitrogen atmosphere until TLC (acetone/
(
BuOH/H O ) 5:4:1) showed full conversion to the corresponding
2
alditol (6-16 h). The solution was cooled to room temperature
followed by addition of water (50 mL). The mixture was washed
with CH
2
Cl
2
(4 × 50 mL) and the combined organic phases were
The reaction can also be applied to partially protected
carbohydrate substrates. We envisioned that the tetrose L-threose
could be prepared from D-glucose in a few steps by using the
decarbonylation as the key step. L-Threose is a useful chiral
starting material,14 but is not available from natural sources. It
has previously been prepared by oxidative degradation of other
carbohydrates15 and from L-tartaric acid. However, none of
these routes takes advantage of the most abundant carbohydrate,
D-glucose.
extracted with water (2 × 10 mL). The combined aqueous phases
were concentrated and the residue co-concentrated with EtOH. The
resulting residue was further purified by either flash column
chromatography (CH
phase column chromatography (H
2
Cl
2
/MeOH/H
2
O ) 4:1:0 to 65:25:4) or reverse
2
O). The reaction could also be
monitored by measuring the evolution of carbon monoxide. In this
case, the reaction flask was connected to a burette filled with water.
The bottom of the burette was further connected to a water reservoir
with a large surface area. At rt (25 °C) full conversion of the aldose
corresponds to 68 mL of carbon monoxide.
16
The synthesis of L-threose began by converting glucose into
D-Arabinitol. White crystals. R
f
0.49 (acetone/BuOH/H
2
O ) 5:4:
diisopropylidene glucofuranose 117 (Scheme 1). The more labile
5
22
D
20
19
D
1). [R]
Mp 98-99 °C (MeOH) (lit. mp 101-102 °C (EtOH)). H NMR
300 MHz, D O) δ 3.86 (ddd, J ) 2.0, 5.3, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dd,
J ) 2.7, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (ddd, J ) 2.7, 6.2, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.58
O)
: C, 39.47;
-10.3 (c 0.2, MeOH) (lit. [R]
-12 (c 1, MeOH)).
21
1
,6-O-isopropylidene acetal was selectively hydrolyzed in
(
2
aqueous acetic acid followed by evaporation of the solvent. The
crude triol 2 was then subjected to periodate cleavage to afford
aldehyde 3.18 Previously, periodic acid (H5IO6) in dry ether has
been shown to affect acetal hydrolysis and glycol cleavage in
(
m, 3H), 3.50 (dd, J ) 2.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, D
2
5 12 5
δ 72.3, 71.8, 71.7, 64.5, 64.4. Anal. Calcd for C H O
H, 7.95. Found: C, 39.55; H, 7.65.
Erythritol. White crystals. R
). Mp 116-117 °C (MeOH/heptane) (lit. mp 120-121 °C). H
NMR (300 MHz, D O) δ 3.74-3.65 (m, 2H), 3.62-3.49 (m, 4H).
C NMR (75 MHz, D O) δ 73.3, 64.0. Anal. Calcd for C
C, 39.34; H, 8.25. Found: C, 39.05; H, 8.00.
D-Threitol. White crystals. R 0.52 (acetone/BuOH/H
f
0.47 (acetone/BuOH/H O ) 5:4:
2
(
14) For recent examples, see: (a) Evans, D. A.; Cee, V. J.; Siska, S. J.
22
1
1
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9433. (b) Li, F.; Schwardt, O.; J a¨ ger, V.
Synthesis 2006, 2173. (c) F u¨ rstner, A.; Wuchrer, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006,
2
13
2
4 10 4
H O :
1
2, 76. (d) Wu, T.; Froeyen, M.; Kempeneers, V.; Pannecouque, C.; Wang,
J.; Busson, R.; De Clercq, E.; Herdewijn, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
056. (e) Achmatowicz, M.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2229.
15) (a) Isbell, H. S.; Frush, H. L. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 72, 301 (from
5
f
2
O ) 5:4:
-7.0 (c 0.9, MeOH)).
(
22
23
23
1). [R]
D
-7.5 (c 0.5, MeOH) (lit. [R]
D
L-ascorbic acid). (b) Morgenlie, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1972, 26, 2146 (from
L-sorbose). (c) Perlin, A. S. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1962, 1, 68 (from
L-arabinitol).
24
1
Mp 89-91 °C (MeOH) (lit. mp 90-91 °C (BuOH)). H NMR
(
16) (a) Chattopadhyay, A.; Dhotare, B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998,
, 2715. (b) Nakaminami, G.; Edo, H.; Nakagawa, M. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1973, 46, 266.
(19) Wu, W.-L.; Wu, Y.-L. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3586.
(20) Lewis, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1991, 197.
(21) Richtmyer, N. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1970, 12, 135.
(22) Trenner, N. R.; Bacher, F. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2352.
(23) Kitajima, J.; Ishikawa, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Ida, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1999, 47, 988.
9
(
17) Schmidt, O. T. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1963, 2, 318.
(18) Gautam, D.; Kumar, D. N.; Rao, B. V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2
006, 17, 819.
9
784 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 25, 2007