L. Zhao et al.
Catalysis Communications 149 (2021) 106209
system, the reduction temperature of NiO decreased and furthermore
the reducibility of NiO increased with the increase of Co content. Hou
et al. [7] found that Ni/Al2O3 catalyst had good catalytic activity in
methane reforming but the catalyst suffered from the problem of deac-
tivation. After introducing a small amount of Rh, the catalytic stability of
Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was improved. The characterization result showed
that Rh improved the dispersion of Ni and decreased the reduction
temperature of NiO. In conclusion, adding a second-metal component
into Ni-based catalysts can not only improve the catalytic activity and
stability, but also reduce the reduction temperature of NiO.
Table 1
Effect of MOx on catalytic performance of NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2.
Catalyst
XV/
SPO
/
S2-
S2-
S2-
S2-
Period of
%
%
/
/
/
/
instantaneous
hydrogen flow
time/min
PHA
PHEA
PH
PH
%
%
%
SPO
NiO/
93.1
100
3.2
39.6
2.3
56.0
0
0
0
None
Nb2O5-
a
TiO2
NiO-
23.0
21.8
28.9
33.9
20.6
61.3
2.7
0–45.4
PdO/
Consequently, a second-metal oxide component MOx (PdO, Co3O4,
IrO2 or Rh2O3) was introduced into NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst to assist
NiO reduction in reaction in this work. We aimed to clarify the reason
why adding second-metal component could promote the reduction of
NiO in the reaction process. So the effect of the addition of a second
metal component on the catalytic performance of NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 was
evaluated first and then the effect on the reduction property was
analyzed by a series of characterization techniques.
Nb2O5-
TiO2
NiO-
100
100
100
100
0
0
77.1
64.8
61.7
13.0
3.5
2.2
1.8
0.6
52.5–118.8
9–106.3
0–94
Co3O4/
Nb2O5-
TiO2
NiO-
0
0
IrO2/
Nb2O5-
TiO2
NiO-
0
0
2. Experimental
Rh2O3/
Nb2O5-
TiO2
2.1. Catalyst preparation and characterization
Co3O4/
Nb2O5-
24.1
23.1
None
b
NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation
method. The as-prepared samples were characterized by several tech-
niques, namely, XRD, H2-TPR, H2-TPD and XPS. More details about the
synthesis procedure and characterization can be found in the Supple-
mentary material.
TiO2
V: n-valeraldehyde; PO: n-pentanol; 2-PHA: 2-propylheptanal; 2-PHEA: 2-pro-
pyl-2-heptenal;
2-PH: 2-propylheptanol. X: conversion; S: selectivity.
Reaction conditions: a weight percentage of catalyst =15%, T = 200 ◦C, P = 3
MPa, t = 6 h.
Nb2O5 loading was 5 wt% of TiO2, NiO loading was 13 wt% of Nb2O5-TiO2 and
MOx loading was 1 wt% of Nb2O5-TiO2.
2.2. Catalytic performance evaluation
a
NiO loading was 14 wt% of Nb2O5-TiO2.
The catalytic tests were carried out in a 100 mL stainless steel
autoclave charged with 3.6 g catalyst and 30 mL (24 g) of n-valer-
aldehyde. Prior to experiments, the air inside was replaced with
hydrogen. The mixture was heated and the reaction was carried out at
200 ◦C for 6 h under the H2 pressure of 3.0 MPa with stirring. After the
completion of reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and
was separated by centrifugation. The liquid was quantitatively analyzed
by a SP-2100 gas chromatograph (Beijing Beifen-Ruili Analytical In-
strument Co., Ltd) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID)
operated at 250 ◦C according to the literature [1].
b
Co3O4 loading was 14 wt% of Nb2O5-TiO2.
reaction is more competitive than n-valeraldehyde direct hydrogenation
reaction. In this work, the ratio of S2-PH to SPO was greater than 1 over
NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts. Furthermore, the ratio of S2-PH to SPO
was the largest, up to 3.5 over NiO-Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst; the
selectivity of 2-PH reached 77.1% while the selectivity of n-pentanol was
only 21.8%. Therefore, NiO-Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst was chosen as
the suitable bimetallic catalyst for further research.
In order to analyze the reason why the NiO-Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2
catalyst has excellent catalytic performance, the catalytic performance
of Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2 was evaluated under the same conditions as NiO-
Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2 and the results were also listed in Table 1. The
condensation product was not completely hydrogenated, indicating that
a lower hydrogenation activity over Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst. It also
showed that there was interaction between Ni and Co, which affected
the catalytic performance of NiO-Co3O4/Nb2O5-TiO2.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Effect of MOx on catalytic performance of NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2
The effect of second-metal component on the catalytic performance
of NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 was evaluated and the results are shown in Table 1.
It can be seen that n-valeraldehyde was incompletely converted and the
target product 2-PH was not formed over NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst.
Some intermediates (2-propyl-2-heptenal and 2-propylheptanal) and a
small amount of direct hydrogenation product n-pentanol were formed
instead, indicating that NiO failed to be completely reduced in reaction.
However, n-valeraldehyde was completely converted and 2-PH became
the main product over NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts, suggesting that
NiO could be reduced in reaction. It can also be seen that the ratio of S2-
The above results showed that adding second-metal component
could promote the reduction of NiO in the reaction process. To analyze
the promotion effect of a second-metal component on NiO reduction and
on the catalytic performance of NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2, NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2
catalysts were characterized by means of XRD, H2-TPR, H2-TPD and XPS
techniques.
to SPO was 0 and the selectivity of n-pentanol was only 3.2% over
3.2. Characterization of NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts
PH
NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalyst, indicating that n-valeraldehyde self-
condensation reaction took place predominately while hydrogenation
reaction hardly occurred. The ratio of S2-PH to SPO varied with different
bimetallic catalysts and decreased as following order: NiO-Co3O4/
Nb2O5-TiO2 > NiO-PdO/Nb2O5-TiO2 > NiO-IrO2/Nb2O5-TiO2 > NiO-
Rh2O3/Nb2O5-TiO2. If the ratio of S2-PH to SPO is 1, the competitiveness
of n-valeraldehyde self-condensation reaction is comparable with
respect to that of n-valeraldehyde direct hydrogenation reaction. If the
ratio of S2-PH to SPO is greater than 1, n-valeraldehyde self-condensation
3.2.1. Analysis of XRD
XRD patterns of the fresh and the recovered NiO/Nb2O5-TiO2 and
NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts are shown in Fig. 1. NiO were detected
besides anatase TiO2 in the fresh NiO-MOx/Nb2O5-TiO2 catalysts.
However, the characteristic peaks of Nb2O5, PdO, IrO2, Rh2O3 and
Co3O4 were not observed due to their low loading, smaller grain size and
high dispersion on the supporter surface. For the recovered NiO/Nb2O5-
TiO2 catalyst, a weak diffraction peak of NiO was detected besides
2