Organic Letters
Letter
multistep coupling of anilines and indolines to synthesize N-aryl-
1-amino indoles (Scheme 1b).8 Inspiring by these ideas and our
previous finding about o-nitrobenzyl alcohols,9 herein, we
disclosed a protocol which realize the construction of N-aryl-
1-amino indoles in one-pot by a redox coupling process
(Scheme 1c). The inexpensive o-nitrobenzyl alcohols could
produce the oxidized intermediates via a photoinduced method,
which can construct N−N bonds with indolines. These products
bearing an aldehyde or ketone group, can be further transformed
into useful functional molecules, such as fluorescent probes.
We initiated our studies with o-nitrobenzyl alcohol 1a and
indoline 2a as model substrates to screen the reaction conditions
(Table 1). At the outset, we obtained 30% yield with no
promote the process, achieved in 66% yield (Table 1, entries
11−13). The amount of solvent was increased and the self-
coupling products of o-nitrobenzyl alcohol reduced obviously
(Table 1, entry 14). After screening the acids, the combination
of acetic acid and TEAI could greatly improve the reaction yield
to 81% (Table 1, entries 15 and 16). In the end, we screened the
equiv of acetic acid and TEAI, isolated in 86% yield when the
acetic acid and TEAI achieved at 1 equiv (Table 1, entries 17−
19). By the way, we also conducted this reaction under N2
atmosphere and achieved 88% yield.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
investigated the substrate scope of o-nitrobenzyl alcohols 1
with 2a (Scheme 2). The o-nitrobenzyl alcohol starting materials
(A−J) were prepared by the reductive coupling of o-nitro-
benzaldehyde and phenylboronic acid (see more details in the
Supporting Information). At the outset, we investigated the
effect of methyl groups at different sites on the reaction. The 5-
methyl (3b) delivered the highest yield (87%), oppositely, the 2-
methyl (3c) and 3-methyl (3d) delivered the unsatisfactory
yield (39% and 59%, respectively) because of the steric demands
of reactive intermediate. In the same 5-position, electron-
withdrawing groups (3e−3f) also achieved nice yields in 81%
and 77%, and electron-donating groups (3g) achieved moderate
yield in 58%. Subsequently, the groups with different steric
hindrances at the 4-position (3h−3l) were investigated and
achieved moderate to good yields (59%−72%). In addition, the
absolute configuration of 3e was unambiguously confirmed by
the single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Next, we further studied the effect of the substituent at the
benzylic position (R) on the reaction. Product 3m with alkyl
group achieved in 62% yield, and the effect that different sites
and various groups on the benzene ring (R) contributes to the
reaction was explored (3n-3r). The m-substituted and p-
substituted substrates had a better reaction effect than the o-
substituted, and both electron withdrawing and electron-
donating groups showed good yields (61%−77%). Products
3s-3t with aryl and heterocycle groups also achieved in 72% and
60%, respectively. We explored the combined effects of the two
substitution sites (3u−3v). They afforded good yields, and the
strong electron-withdrawing group (p-NO2) had a poorer yield
(61%). Finally, the o-nitropyridine alcohols could also be
compatible with the reaction and obtained the 3w in 70% yield.
Ultimately, the generality of the indoline framework was also
examined (Scheme 3). Products 4a−4p with various groups
were achieved in moderate to good yields (37%−85%). The
reaction was compatible with indolines that bearing electron-
withdrawing or electron-donating groups, but the 5-I (4g)
achieved an unsatisfactory yield, because of the dehalogenation.
The strong electron-withdrawing groups, such as 5-CN (4l) and
5-NO2 (4m) afforded the desired products in 61% and 41%,
respectively. Notably, compared with 5-Cl (4e) and 6-Cl (4o)
products, the 7-Cl (4p) had a poorer yield, which could be
explained as a steric effect. Finally, the heterocyclic indoline was
explored, and the product 4q was obtained in good yield (64%).
With the completion of the substrate expansion, we began to
excavate the potential of this skeleton and performed some
functionalized applications. We used p-toluenesulfonyl hydra-
zide 5 to react with 3a to obtain 6 in excellent yield (91%), which
can be used as an intermediate to participate in various
cyclization reactions (Scheme 4a).10 On the other hand, we used
2-bromobenzyl bromide 7 to react with 3a under strong alkaline
conditions to obtain 8. Then, the palladium catalyst, ligand, and
strong base were utilized as partners in an intramolecular
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
base/acid
(equiv)
solvent
(mL)
entry 1a:2a additive (equiv)
yield (%)
b
1
2
3
4
5
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
−
−
−
−
−
−
MeCN (2.0)
30
32
42
trace
trace
b
b
b
b
K2HPO3 (2.0) MeCN (2.0)
K2HPO3 (2.0) DCM (2.0)
K2HPO3 (2.0) DMF (2.0)
K2HPO3 (2.0) toluene
(2.0)
b
b
c
6
7
8
1:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
3:1
−
−
−
−
−
HCOOK (2.0) DCM (2.0)
38
51
12
n.r.
56
61
−
−
−
−
−
DCM (2.0)
DCM (2.0)
DCM (2.0)
DCM (2.0)
DCM (2.0)
d
9
10
11
3:1 PhI(OAc)2
(0.5)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3:1 TBHP (0.5)
3:1 TEAI (0.5)
3:1 TEAI (0.5)
3:1 TEAI (0.5)
3:1 TEAI (0.5)
2:1 TEAI (0.5)
2:1 TEAI (1.0)
2:1 TEAI (2.0)
2:1 TEAI (1.0)
−
−
−
DCM (2.0)
DCM (2.0)
DCM (4.0)
52
63
68
74
81
79
PhCO2H (0.5) DCM (4.0)
AcOH (0.5)
AcOH (0.5)
AcOH (1.0)
AcOH (2.0)
AcOH (1.0)
DCM (4.0)
DCM (4.0)
DCM (4.0)
DCM (4.0)
DCM (4.0)
e
86 (93)
77
f
88
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol) 2a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), TEAI
(0.2 mmol), AcOH (0.2 mmol), solvent (4.0 mL), 24 h, room
temperature, with a 24 W UV LEDs (385−405 nm) irradiation under
b
c
air. Isolated yields. With UV light (350−380 nm) irradiation. With
d
e
blue light (440−460 nm) irradiation. No light. Yields determined
f
by GC-MS. N2.
additives (Table 1, entry 1), and the weak base K2HPO3 might
promote the reaction (Table 1, entry 2). Then the solvents and
bases were screened, the bases helped little, and the DCM was
the superior solvent (Table 1, entries 3−6). We adjusted the
ratio to 3:1 (1a:2a) because of the ordinary conversion of 1a,
and the yield reached 51% yield simultaneously (Table 1, entry
7). Subsequently, the light source was screened, and the UV light
(385−405 nm) achieved the highest yield in 56%. Meanwhile,
the reaction did not start with no light irradiation (Table 1,
entries 8−10). Some additives were added and oxidants did not
seem to work, but the tetraethylammonium iodide (TEAI)
could better reduce the production of byproduct indole to
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX