J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 120, No. 7, 15 February 2004
Cooperative radiative and nonradiative effects in K2NaScF6
3379
steps involved, one ͑G͒ on V3ϩ and the other one ͑F͒ on
This is a small value considering the almost optimal spectral
overlap, and we ascribe it to the low concentration of both
dopant ions in this lattice.
Er3ϩ, the excitation profile corresponds to the product G F
*
of the two profiles.
The second mechanism, which experimentally manifests
2. Cooperative upconversion mechanisms
itself in the structured peak labeled G E in Fig. 4͑b͒, is more
*
unusual and novel. It is a truly cooperative mechanism, in
which both ions are involved in the upconversion step itself.
We use a simple V3ϩ-Er3ϩ dimer picture to represent it in
Figure 2͑b͒ shows that upconversion emission can be
induced in K2NaScF6 :Er3ϩ; V3ϩ by exciting into the
3
V3ϩ 3T1g→ T2g absorption band in the far red. There is no
Er3ϩ absorption at the laser wavelength used in this experi-
ment, and a control experiment with the singly Er3ϩ doped
crystal does not show any upconversion emission. The three
emission bands in the near UV, green and red spectral re-
gions are very similar to the UC bands in the singly doped
Fig. 6͑c͒. While the first step G is not unusual, the second
3ϩ 1
step E is. It is a radiative step with V
T
as the initial
2g
and Er3ϩ 2H9/2 as the final state. This follows from the ener-
gies of the peaks in the G E band in Fig. 4͑b͒. They corre-
*
spond to energy differences between the Er3ϩ 2H9/2 levels
and 10 413 cmϪ1, the metastable lowest excited state of V3ϩ
.
2
4
sample ͓Fig. 2͑a͔͒ and assigned to H9/2→ I15/2
,
4S3/2
4
4
4
In the dimer picture the intermediate state in the upconver-
→ I15/2 and F9/2→ I15/2 transitions, respectively. The
sion process is a dimer state mainly localized on V3ϩ
,
4
4
4
power dependence of the H9/2→ I15/2
,
4S3/2→ I15/2 and
4F9/2→ I15/2 upconversion emission intensity was found to
be very close to quadratic, confirming the two-photon char-
acter of the process.
4
whereas the upper emitting state is a dimer state with pre-
dominant Er3ϩ character. In a number of mixed lanthanide or
mixed transition metal/lanthanide systems we have recently
identified similar cooperative upconversion processes, and in
all of these we ascribed them to an exchange mechanism.23,24
In the present case we have no direct contact between V3ϩ
and Er3ϩ through a common bridging ligand, and the situa-
tion is less clear. We also considered another possible and
less exotic mechanism, namely G on V3ϩ, followed by en-
We note that the Er3ϩ bands in Fig. 2͑b͒ are not as well
resolved as in Fig. 2͑a͒. The individual lines are broader, and
this is ascribed to an inhomogeneous broadening due to the
relatively high V3ϩ doping on the one hand and to small
shifts and splittings of the Er3ϩ levels due to V3ϩ-Er3ϩ ex-
change interactions on the other. The green emission is vis-
ible by eye at temperatures up to 200 K for 96 mW laser
excitation at 14 175 cmϪ1 into V3ϩ 3T2g . But, as seen in Fig.
2͑b͒, the visible emissions are very weak compared to the
NIR emission bands. A comparison of Figs. 4͑b͒ and 4͑c͒
4
ergy transfer to Er3ϩ 4I11/2 and relaxation to I13/2 and then
4
4I13/2→ F7/2 on Er3ϩ as the second excitation step. Adding
6503 cmϪ1, the Er3ϩ origin, to the peak positions in the band
system labeled G E in Fig. 4͑b͒, we do not get the known
*
energies of the 4F7/2 level, see also Fig. 4͑a͒. In Fig. 6͑d͒ we
show the sensitization and upconversion scheme responsible
for the underlying broad band between 13 500 and 14 500
cmϪ1 in Fig. 4͑b͒. Two quanta of V3ϩ 1T2g excitation are
consecutively injected by energy transfer into Er3ϩ. The re-
3
confirms that V3ϩ 3T1g→ T2g broadband excitation above
13 500 cmϪ1 is most efficient in inducing Er3ϩ NIR (4I11/2
4
4
4
→ I15/2ϩ4I13/2→ I15/2) emission. Direct Er3ϩ 4I15/2→ I11/2
excitation, on the other hand, is unimportant.
The absorption and upconversion excitation spectra
shown in Fig. 4 allow for an unambiguous identification and
characterization of three distinct mechanisms. They are sche-
matically represented in Figs. 6͑b͒, 6͑c͒, and 6͑d͒ and will
now be discussed in this order. The first step is the
sulting excitation spectrum corresponds to G G and is thus
*
broadband.
Let us finally return to the original question: is the title
compound a broadband sensitizing upconverter? The answer
is yes, but with an extremely low efficiency, particularly at
3ϩ 3
3
V
T
→ T2g excitation. It is common to all three mecha-
1g
nism, and we label it G in Fig. 4 and 6. The onset of the 3T1g
temperatures of 200 K and above. At 15 K for narrow-band
3ϩ 3
to T2g absorption band is around 13 500 cmϪ1, and we can
3
laser excitation with 150 mW into the V
T
absorption
2g
follow it up to about 14 500 cmϪ1, the limit of our Ti:sap-
phire tuning range. In Fig. 4͑c͒ it can be seen that we reach
about the maximum of the absorption band. This is in good
agreement with the absorption spectrum of V3ϩ in
K2NaScF6 in Ref. 13, in which this absorption band extends
from 13 500 to about 15 500 cmϪ1. In the mechanism de-
we get a VIS:NIR photon ratio of about 0.1%. For broadband
excitation, such as in a lamp, the situation would be much
more favorable. Figure 4͑b͒ shows that excitation peaks la-
beled C D and the sum of G E, G F and G G are of com-
*
*
*
*
parable intensity. This is mainly the result of the high absorp-
3
3
tion cross section G across the T1g→ T2g absorption
3ϩ 3
3
profile.
picted in Fig. 6͑b͒, this V
T
→ T2g excitation relaxes to
1g
1T2g and is then transferred to Er3ϩ 4I11/2 ͑Sec. IV B 1͒. The
V. CONCLUSIONS
next step is an excited-state absorption ͑ESA͒ 4I11/2 to H9/2
2
on Er3ϩ ͓process F in Fig. 6͑b͔͒. The experimental evidence
K2NaScF6 codoped with Er3ϩ and V3ϩ is a candidate
for broadband sensitized upconversion from the far red and
near-infrared into the green and red. The present study
proves the principal feasibility. At 15 K broadband excitation
between 12 000 and 14 500 cmϪ1 will roughly double the
visible light output in an Er3ϩ and V3ϩ codoped crystal of
K2NaScF6 compared to single Er3ϩ doping. Even though
for this is the peak labeled G F in the upconversion excita-
*
tion spectrum Fig. 4͑b͒. Its position corresponds to the en-
ergy difference between the 2H9/2 levels and 10 198 cmϪ1 the
4
4
2
lowest I11/2 level of Er3ϩ. The I15/2→ H9/2 GSA is very
2
weak, see Fig. 3͑a͒, but the H9/2 position in a fluoride envi-
ronment is well established.22 We conclude that for excita-
tion energies between 14 300 and 14 500 cmϪ1 this is the
main UC mechanism. Since there are two radiative excitation
4
green Er3ϩ 4S3/2→ I15/2 luminescence can be observed by
3ϩ 3
3
eye upon V
T
→ T2g excitation in the full temperature
1g
131.111.185.72 On: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:43:01