C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Asymmetric Addition of Ethyl Groups to Ketones with
Ligand 6 in Equation 1
be used when handling the enantiomerically enriched tertiary
alcohols to avoid loss of ee (see Supporting Information).
We have also examined the addition of dimethylzinc to pro-
piophenone using the same enantiomer of the ligand shown in
Scheme 1 and employed in eq 1. Interestingly, the addition to
propiophenone using dimethylzinc gave the (R)-enantiomer of
2-phenyl-2-butanol (2 mol % ligand, 83% yield, 94% ee) while
the addition of diethylzinc to acetophenone gave the (S)-enantiomer
of the same alcohol in 96% ee (Table 1, entry 1). Thus, employing
the same enantiomer of the ligand one can obtain either enantiomer
of 2-phenyl-2-butanol with excellent enantioselectivity.
To test the scalability of this process, the asymmetric addition
reaction of 3-methylacetophenone was examined on a larger scale.
Reaction of 5.0 g (37 mmol) of this ketone was conducted with 2
mol % ligand. After 40 h at room temperature, the reaction was
worked-up with aqueous ammonium chloride, extracted into CH2-
Cl2, and purified on silica to provide 4.5 g (73% yield) of the
addition product with 99% ee. The ligand was recovered in 84%
yield. These results highlight the practicality of this system.
The construction of chiral quarternary centers remains one of
the most challenging frontiers of asymmetric catalysis.13,14 The
catalyst system outlined here generates chiral tertiary alcohols and
allylic alcohols with excellent ee’s. The chiral ligand 6 is easily
synthesized in two steps from commercially available materials and
can be prepared on large scale. Furthermore, we have demonstrated
that the reaction is easily scalable and can be conducted at room
temperature.
We are currently examining the scope and mechanism of this
efficient and enantioselective asymmetric C-C bond-forming
reaction.
a ee’s determined by GC or HPLC. See Supporting Information for
details.
Electron-donating and -withdrawing substituents have little effect
on the ee of the product; 4-methoxy- and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-
acetophenones gave 94 and 98% ee, respectively (entries 3 and 4).
However, the substituent had a significant impact on reaction times
for these substrates. The trifluoromethyl and methoxy derivatives
required 14 and 111 h to complete, respectively. The results from
the reaction of 2-methylacetophenone demonstrated that substitution
of the 2-position does not adversely affect the enantioselectivity
(96%) but does result in reduced reactivity and yield (24%, entry
5). R-Tetralone also gave excellent ee (>99%); however, the yield
was low (35%). Yus also reported a low yield with this compound
(25% yield).7,8 In our case, two aldol products were isolated in 48%
yield.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation (CHE-9733274) and the National Institutes of
Health (GM58101).
Supporting Information Available: Procedures, characterization
of 6 and chiral alcohols, and ee analyses (PDF). This material is
References
(1) Pu, L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 757-824.
(2) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New York,
1994.
(3) Soai, K.; Niwa, S. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 833-856.
(4) Knochel, P.; Jones, P. Organozinc Reagents; Oxford University Press:
Oxford, 1999.
(5) Dosa, P. I.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 445-446.
(6) Kitamura, M.; Okada, S.; Suga, S.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 4028-4036.
Other alkyl aryl ketones also proved to be very good substrates
for the asymmetric addition reaction. Valerophenone and 3-chlo-
ropropiophenone underwent additions with enantioselectivities of
88 and 89%, respectively, in good yields (entries 7 and 8).
Reactions of R,â-unsaturated ketones in eq 1 provided tertiary
allylic alcohols. 1-Cyclohexenyl methyl ketone gave product with
96% ee (entry 9). trans-4-Phenyl-3-buten-2-one proved to be an
excellent substrate for the addition reaction, giving 90% ee (entry
10). The related dialkyl ketone, 4-phenyl-2-butanone, was envi-
sioned to be a difficult substrate because the size of the methyl
and the alkyl groups are comparable. Surprisingly, this substrate
gave the addition product in 70% ee (entry 11). Note that care must
(7) Ramo´n, D. J.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1239-1242.
(8) Ramo´n, D. J.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5651-5666.
(9) Takahashi, H.; Kawakita, T.; Ohno, M.; Yoshioka, M.; Kobayashi, S.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 5691-5700.
(10) Ostwald, R.; Chavant, P.-Y.; Stadtmuller, H.; Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 4143-4153.
(11) Pritchett, S.; Woodmansee, D. H.; Gantzel, P.; Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 6423-6424.
(12) Balsells, J.; Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3250-3251.
(13) Corey, E. J.; Guzman-Perez, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 388-
401.
(14) Christoffers, J.; Mann, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4591-4597.
JA026568K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 37, 2002 10971