Notes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 16, 1999 6117
filtered and recrystallized from ethanol/water (50:50): 1.645 g,
observed were almost the same (Table 2, entry 2). When
the more acidic t-BuOH (pKa 32.2) was used (1:5:5 ratio),
the yield of 5 was significantly depressed to 30.9% (Table
2, entry 3).
When the reaction of 1 with t-BuOK was performed in
DMSO-d6 for 30 min and the anions neutralized with
D2O, no incorporation of deuterium was detected in 1 and
5 by GC-mass spectrometry. The only products observed
were 5, 9, and 10. In the presence of t-BuOK and an
equimolar amount of t-BuOD, the yield of 5 decreased to
6.7%, and 11% deuterium incorporation was observed for
the substrate, affording 1-d . No other products were
detected (Table 2, entries 4 and 5).
1
34% yield; mp 136-137 °C (lit.10 mp 137 °C); H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 1.0 (6H, s), 2.4 (3H, s), 2.6 (2H, s), 6.85-6.95 (2H, m), 7.0 (1H,
s), 7.1-7.2 (3H, m), 7.2-7.8 (4H, dd); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 21.6,
24.9, 39.0, 46.9, 126.1, 127.8, 127.9, 129.4, 130.2, 135.1, 137.3,
143.9. MS (EI+) 240 (49.6), 239 (61.8), 92 (44.2), 91 (100.0).
Decom p osition of th e Tosylh yd r a zon e 18 w ith Sod iu m
Meth oxid e. The tosylhydrazone of 18 (0.59 g, 1.8 mmol) was
dissolved in 25 mL of diglime, sodium methoxide (0.49 g, 7.2
mmol) was added to this solution, and the flask was gradually
heated in an oil bath. At 150 °C, decomposition of tosylhydrazone
was observed, developing a yellow color. After 2 h, the reaction
was quenched with addition of an excess of ammonium nitrate
and 50 mL of water, and then the reaction mixture was extracted
with diethyl ether. The mixture of the reaction was chromato-
graphed over silica gel and eluted with petroleum ether. The
less polar fraction was analyzed by GC-MS, giving a complex
mixture of products with molecular weight of 146.
Gen er a l P r oced u r es for th e Rea ction of 1 w ith t-Bu OK.
The reaction was carried out in a 20 mL, three-necked Schlenk
tube, equipped with nitrogen gas inlet, a condenser with a
cooling jacket, and a magnetic stirrer. The tube was charged
with nitrogen and then with 10 mL of dried DMSO and 1.2 mmol
of t-BuOK, and the substrate was added. After varying deter-
mined times, the reaction was quenched with an excess of
ammonium nitrate and 10 mL of water, and then the mixture
was extracted with diethyl ether. The products were quantified
by GC by the internal standard method, immediately after
extraction.
1,1-Dim eth yl-2-p h en ylcyclop r op a n e (5).10 Compound 5
was isolated from the reaction of 1 with t-BuOK by silica gel
chromatography with petroleum ether and further purified by
distillation: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.79 (3H, s), 0.66-0.91 (2H, m),
1.22 (3H, s), 1.84-1.91 (1H, m) 7.13-7.29 (5H, m); 13C NMR
(CDCl3) δ18.4, 19.0, 20.3, 27.5, 29.8, 125.5, 127.8, 128.9, 140.3;
MS (EI+) 146 (31.1), 131 (100.0), 116 (17.6), 91 (34.3).
These results can be rationalized as follows. The very
weak acids t-BuNH2 (pKa above 35)5 and DMSO (pKa )
35)5 are not able to protonate the carbanion intermediate
8, whereas when t-BuOH is used, 8 is quenched and the
yield of 5 decreases (thus, the pKa for the benzylic
hydrogen should be intermediate between the pKa of
t-BuOH (32.2) and DMSO (35)). The intermediacy of a
carbanion in the formation of 5 (eq 5) is confirmed by
the incorporation of deuterium in the substrate (11% d1)
in the reaction carried out in the presence of the labeled
t-BuOD and DMSO-d6.
2,2-Dim eth yl-3-p h en ylp r op yl t-Bu tyl Eth er (9). Com-
pound 9 was isolated from the reaction of 1 with t-BuOK by silica
gel chromatography with petroleum ether: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ
0.8(6H, s), 1.2 (9H, s), 2.5 (2H,s), 2.9 (2H, s), 7.1-7.3 (5H, m);
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 24.7, 27.6, 35.2, 44.9, 69.1, 72.0, 125.6, 127.5,
130.7, 139.5; MS (EI+) 164 (1.77), 146 (6.72), 92 (14.70), 91
(70.97), 57 (100.00), 43 (4.60), 41 (27.80).
Exp er im en ta l Section
Ma ter ia ls. 1-Iodo-2,2-dimethyl-3-phenylpropane12 (1) and
1-chloro-2,2-dimethyl-3-phenylpropane13 (11) were synthesized
by reaction of the corresponding tosylate with KI or LiCl in DMF.
The tosylate (12) and the benzenesulfonate (13) were prepared
by standard procedures. p-Toluensulfonylhydrazide was obtained
from reaction of hydrazine hydrate (Carlo Erba) with p-toluen-
sulfonyl chloride (Fluka) in THF.14 1-Iodo-2-methyl-2-phenyl-
propane15 (14b) was obtained by reaction of the corresponding
tosylate with KI in DMF. 1-Chloro-2-methyl-2-phenylpropane
(14a , Aldrich) and t-BuOK (Fluka) were commercially available
and used as received. DMSO (Carlo Erba) was distilled under
vacuum and stored over molecular sieves (4A).
3,3-Dim eth yl-4-p h en ylbu tyl Meth yl Su lfoxid e (10). Com-
pound 10 was isolated from the reaction of 1 with t-BuOK by
silica gel chromatography with diethyl ether: 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 1.0 (6H, s), 1.5-1.8 (2H, m), 2.60 (3H,s), 2.61 (2H, s), 2.7-2.9
(2H, m), 7.1-7.3 (5H, m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 26.1, 26.2, 33.7,
33.8, 38.2, 48.1, 50.0, 125.9, 127.6, 130.2, 137.9; IR (KBr) cm-1
1055.8; GC-MS analysis: this compound decomposes in the
injector giving the product that has lost CH3S(O)H with MS (EI+)
160 (5.2), 92 (38.0), 91 (81.8), 69 (100.0), 68 (12.4) and the peak
of the giving compound with MS (EI+) 208 (14.4), 117 (31.6),
116 (12.9), 91 (41.2), 61 (100.0).
2-Meth yl-2-p h en ylp r op yl ter t-Bu tyl Eth er (16).18 Com-
pound 16 was isolated from the reaction of 14b with t-BuOK by
silica gel chromatography with petroleum ether: 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 1.1 (9H, s), 1.3 (6H, s), 3.3 (2H, s), 7.1-7.4 (5H, m);
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 25.8, 27.4, 38.7, 71.2, 72.2, 125.6, 126.2,
127.8, 148.3; MS (EI+) 150 (1.4), 120 (8.5), 92 (17.4), 91 (57.1),
57 (72.3), 43 (92.1), 41 (100).
2,2-Dim et h yl-3-p h en ylp r op en -1-a l.16
2,2-Dimethyl-3-
phenylpropen-1-al was prepared by oxidation of 2,2-dimethyl-
3-phenylpropan-1-ol (7.8 g, 47.5 mmol) with pyridinium chloro-
chromate (PCC)17 (15.4 g, 71.5 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2. The
reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for 2 h. Diethyl
ether was added, and the supernatant solution was decanted
from the black gum. Evaporation of the solution produced crude
aldehyde that was purified by distillation under vacuum.
Tosylh yd r a zon e of 2,2-Dim et h yl-3-p h en ylp r op en -1-a l
(18). A solution of 2.7 g (14.5 mmol) of p-toluensulfonylhydrazine
in 45 mL of ethanol and 2.2 mL of acetic acid was treated with
2.34 g (14.4 mmol) of the aldehyde dissolved in 2.9 mL of ethanol.
The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for 2 h and
later cooled to 0 °C. Then ice-cooled water was added and the
tosylhydrazone 18 precipitated after a while. The solid was
3-Meth yl-3-p h en ylbu tyl Meth yl Su lfoxid e (17). Com-
pound 17 was isolated from the reaction of 14b with t-BuOK,
by silica gel chromatography with diethyl ether: 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 1.4 (6H, s), 1.9-2.2 (2H, m), 2.3-2.5 (2H,m), 2.4 (3H, s), 7.1-
7.3 (5H, m); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 29.1, 29.5, 36.8, 37.9, 38.9, 50.9,
126.1, 126.5, 128.5, 147.7; IR (KBr) cm-1 1055.8. GC-MS
analysis: this compound decomposes in the injector giving the
product that has lost CH3S(O)H with MS (EI+) 146 (8.0), 131
(45.1), 91 (41.0), 39 (100), and the peak of the giving compound
with MS (EI+) 194 (9.1), 119 (51.7), 91 (74.0), 75 (74.8), 61 (40.9),
41 (100).
(12) Yuan, K.; Scott, W. J . J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6188.
(13) Duca, J . S.; Gallego, M. H.; Pierini, A. B.; Rossi, R. A. J . Org.
Chem., 1999, 64, 2626.
(14) Friedman, L.; Litle, R. L.; Reichle, W. R. Organic Syntheses;
Wiley: New York, 1973; Collect. Vol. V, p 1055.
(15) Collman, J . P.; Brauman, J . I.; Madonik, A. M. Organometallics
1986, 5, 310.
(16) Stork, G.; Dowed, S. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2178.
(17) Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed.;
Longman Scientific & Technical: Essex, 1989; p 426.
(18) Zimmerman, H. E.; Carpenter, C. W. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
3298.