4
N.A. Saleh et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1200 (2020) 127146
2
.1.2.2. General procedure for synthesis of the C
2
-symmetric
h
6-p-
(OeP). Anal. Calc. for [C60
56.87, H 6.36, N 2.21; found: C 56.72, H 6.22, N 2.09%, [
(c ¼ 1, CHCl ).
2.1.2.2.3. 1-({[(1R,2R)-2-[({2-[(dicyclohexylphosphanyl)oxy]
naphthalen-1-yl}methylidene)amino] cyclohexyl]imino}methyl)
naphthalen-2-yldicyclohexylphosphinite(bis(dichloro-ɳ -p-cymener-
80 2 2 2 2 4
H N O P Ru Cl ] (1267.206 g/mol): C
20
ꢂ
cymene-Ru(II)-phosphinite complexes, 4-6. The binuclear half
sandwich Ru(II) complexes 4e6 were synthesized by reacting
equimolar amounts of the phosphinite ligands, 1e3 and {[Ru(ղ -p-
cymene)(m-CI)Cl] in 30 mL of CH Cl under argon atmosphere.
2 2 2
General procedure for the synthesis of Ru(II) complexes 4e6 can be
a
]
D
¼ ꢁ10.3
3
6
6
ꢂ
1
found in our recent publications [1,32,34].
uthenium(II)) (6). Yield: 190 mg (89%), m.p: 120e122 C. H NMR
(CDCl , ppm): 9.16 (s, 2H, eN]CH), 7.10e7.81 (m, 12H, protons of
naphthyl), 5.29e5.55 (m, 8H, aromatic protons of p-cymene),
3.80e3.85 (m, 2H, CH of Cy), 2.10e2.30 (m, 2H, -CH(CH of p-
cymene), 1.96e2.06 (m, 4H, -CH of Cy), 1.82 (s, 6H, -CH3, of p-
cymene), 1.24e1.80 (m, 48H, protons of OPCy of Cy)
þ -CH
of p-cymene). C NMR (CDCl
172.10, 136.62, 133.40, 128.28, 127.80, 126.55, 123.30,
2
.1.2.2.1. 1-({[(1R,2R)-2-[({2-[(diphenylphosphanyl)oxy]naph-
thalen-1-yl}methylidene)amino] cyclohexyl]imino}methyl)naph-
thalen-2-yldiphenylphosphinite(bis(dichloro-ɳ -p-cymener-
3
d
6
3 2
)
ꢂ
1
uthenium(II))(4). Yield: 180 mg (86%), m.p: 120e122 C. H NMR
CDCl , ppm): 9.16 (br, 2H, eN]CH), 7.27e8.03 (m, 32H, protons
of naphthyl þ OPPh ), 5.06e5.41 (m, 8H, aromatic protons of p-
cymene), 3.10 (br, 2H, -CH of Cy), 2.47 (m, 2H, -CH(CH of p-
cymene), 1.81 (br, 4H, -CH of Cy), 1.66 (s, 6H, -CH of p-cymene),
.32 (br, 4H, -CH of Cy), 0.85e0.87 (m, 12H, eCH(CH
CDCl , ppm): 171.11, 136.94, 133.78, 128.65, 128.27, 128.17, 124.36,
22.72, 121.37, 110.41 (carbons of naphthyl), 158.87 (-N]CH), (not
observed ipso carbon of OPPh ), 135.17, 132.07, 129.81 (ortho, para,
meta carbons of OPPh ), 111.62, 96.72 (ipso carbons of p-cymene),
7.47, 87.54, 92.02, 92.07 (aromatic carbons of p-cymene), 66.95
CH of Cy), 30.16 (-CH(CH of p-cymene), 29.82 (-CH of Cy), 24.24
-CH of Cy), 21.31 (-CH(CH of p-cymene), 17.36 (-CH of p-
, ppm): 118.18 (s, OPPh ). IR (KBr
pellet in cm ): ʋ 3054, 3015 (Aromatic CeH), 2907, 2855 (Aliphatic
CeH),1426 (P-Ph),1008 (OeP). Anal. Calc. for [C72 Ru Cl
2
(
3
d
2
2
1
3
2
0.80e0.92 (m, 12H, eCH(CH
ppm):
3
)
2
3
,
3
)
2
d
2
3
122.80, 118.50, 107.20 (carbons of naphthyl), 158.03 (-N]CH),
110.98, 97.51 (ipso carbons of p-cymene), 88.70, 87.98, 87.74, 86.48
(aromatic carbons of p-cymene), 68.00 (CH of Cy)), 30.35
1
3
1
(
1
2
3 2
) ). C NMR
3
d
(-CH(CH
26.21 (-CH
ene), 17.44 (-CH
155.42 (s, OP(Cy)
matic CeH), 2960, 2823 (Aliphatic CeH): 1436 (P-Cy), 1024 (OeP).
3
)
2
of p-cymene), 37.10, 29.73, 26.96, 26.70, 26.55, 26.35,
of Cys þ -CH of OPCy ), 22.15 (-CH(CH of p-cym-
of p-cymene). P-{ H} NMR (CDCl , ppm):
). IR (KBr pellet in cm ): ʋ 3073, 3053 (Aro-
2
2
2
2
3 2
)
3
1
1
2
3
3
ꢁ1
8
(
(
d
2
3
)
2
2
2
3
)
2
3
Anal. Calc. for [C72
6.78, N 1.96; found: C 60.35, H 6.49, N 1.53%, [
CHCl ).
H
96
N
2
O
2
P
2
Ru
2
Cl
4
] (1427.466 g/mol): C 60.58, H
3
1
1
20
ꢂ
cymene). P-{ H} NMR (CDCl
3
d
2
a]
D
¼ þ9.0 (c ¼ 0.65,
ꢁ
1
3
72
H N
2
O
2
P
2
2
4
]
(
1
1403.274 g/mol): C 61.63, H 5.17, N 2.00; found: C 61.49, H 4.98, N
2
.1.3. General procedure for the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation
of ketones
The details of the procedure used for the catalytic asymmetric
20
ꢂ
.92%, [
a
]
D
¼ þ8.3 (c ¼ 1, CHCl
3
).
2
.1.2.2.2. 1-({[(1R,2R)-2-{[(2-{[bis(propan-2-yl)phosphanyl]oxy}
naphthalen-1-yl)methylidene]
naphthalen-2-ylbis(propan-2-yl)phosphinite (bis(dichloro-ɳ -p-cym-
amino}cyclohexyl]imino}methyl)
transfer hydrogenation of ketones and the methods for product
analysis can be found in our recent publications [34,35].
6
ꢂ
1
eneruthenium(II)) (5). Yield: 170 mg (90%), m.p: 120e122 C.
NMR (CDCl , ppm): 9.28 (s, 2H, eN]CH), 7.28e7.78 (m, 12H,
protons of naphthyl), 5.31e5.54 (m, 8H, aromatic protons of p-
cymene), 3.82 (s, 2H, -CH of Cy), 2.06e2.30 (m, 2H, -CH(CH of p-
of OP Pr), 1.72 (s, 6H, -CH3, of
H
3
d
3
. Results and discussion
3 2
)
i
3.1. Synthesis and characterization of the bis(phosphinite) ligands
(1e3) and their binuclear half sandwich h -p-cymene-Ru(II)
complexes
cymene), 1.84e1.98 (m, 2H, -CH(CH
p-cymene), 1.11e1.45 (m, 32H, eCH(CH
.85e0.89 (m, 12H, eCH(CH of p-cymene). C NMR (CDCl
ppm): 173.30,137.20, 133.61,129.50,127.81, 126.73,124.54,122.60,
18.66, 111.63 (carbons of naphthyl), 160.13 (-N]CH), 111.31, 99.51
ipso carbons of p-cymene), 88.79, 88.74, 86.50, 85.64 (aromatic
carbons of p-cymene), 68.05 (-CH of Cy), 32.07 (-CH of Cy), 30.44
3 2
)
6
i
3
)
2
of OP Pr þ -CH
2
of Cy),
1
3
0
3
)
2
3
,
d
In
the
present
work,
firstly,
1-({[(1R,2R)-2-{[(2-
1
(
hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylidene] amino}cyclohexyl]imino}
methyl)naphthalen-2-ol was synthesized as precursors for phos-
phinites. Then, new chiral C
were prepared from the reaction of above mentioned correspond-
ing alcohol with two equivalents of Ph PCl, (i-Pr) PCl or (Cy) PCl
(Scheme 1). P-{ H} NMR spectroscopy was used to follow the
progress of these reactions. Resonances of the starting materials
disappeared and new singlets obtained in downfield corresponding
2
i
2
-symmetric bis(phosphinite) ligands
(
-CH(CH
3
)
2
of p-cymene), 29.79 (-CH(CH
3
)
2
of OP Pr), 24.74 (-CH
2
of
of
Cy), 22.11 (-CH(CH
OP Pr), 17.42 (-CH3, of p-cymene). P-{ H} NMR (CDCl
d
3
)
2
of p-cymene), 18.20, 18.51 (-CH(CH )
3 2
i
31
1
2
2
2
3
, ppm):
31
1
ꢁ
1
160.84 (s, OPCH(CH
Aromatic CeH), 2907, 2855 (Aliphatic CeH), 1426 (P- Pr), 1008
3 2
) ). IR (KBr pellet in cm ): ʋ 3054, 3015
i
(
Scheme 2. Synthesis of C
2
-symmetric half sandwich h6-p-cymene-Ru(II) complexes (4e6) from the bis(phosphinite) ligands (1e3).