8
DANISH ET AL.
Nitrobenzoic Acid) (DTNB) and 50 μL of the substrate were
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
added in each test tube. Then, all the solutions were incubated
for 1 hr at 37 C and absorbance was measured at 400 nm using
a UV/visible spectrophotometer. Percentage inhibition values
were calculated using the following formula:
Dr Umer Rashid is thankful to Higher Education Commis-
sion, Pakistan for financial support for the purchase of MOE
license under HEC-NRPU project 5291/Federal/NRPU/
R&D/HEC/2016.
ꢀ
Percentage inhibition ð%Þ
absorbance of blank−absorbance of sample
ORCID
=
× 100
Absorbance of blank
7.6 | Docking studies
Docking experiments were performed via molecular operating
environment (MOE) docking program version 2016.08. Crystal
structures of AChE and BChE with PDB codes 1EVE and
1P0I, respectively, were selected for these studies. All the water
REFERENCES
molecules were removed from the protein structure, then
hydrogen atoms were added and energy optimization was car-
ried out using default force field. The three-dimensional
[1] O. Kreye, H. Mutlu, M. A. R. Meier, Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1431.
[
[
[
[
2] P. Adams, F. A. Baron, Chem. Rev. 1965, 65, 567.
3] D. P. N. Sutchell, R. S. Satchell, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1975, 4, 231.
4] A. J. Ager, I. Prakash, D. R. Schaad, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 835.
5] S. Inoue, Y. Yokoo, Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 3651.
(3D) structures of compounds were modeled through the
builder program implemented in MOE. The geometrical param-
eters for 3D structures of the compounds were optimized, and
partial charges were calculated before docking. The 3D proton-
ation of the downloaded enzymes was done and energy mini-
mization of the retrieved protein molecule was carried out
using default parameters of the MOE energy minimization
algorithm (gradient: 0.05, Force Field: MMFF94X). The
resulting model was subjected to systematic conformational
search at default parameters with a RMS gradient of
[6] M. L. Gullino, Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 1076.
[
[
7] F. E. Adelowo, I. A. Ojo, O. S. Amuda, Adv. Biol. Chem. 2011, 1, 122.
8] S. A. Nami, A. O. Husain, I. Ullah, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2014,
118, 380.
[9] T. Dantoine, S. Auriacombe, M. Sarazin, H. Becker, J. J. Pere, I. Bourdeix,
Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2006, 60, 110.
10] K. G. Arun, B. Margherita, J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 2895.
11] Population Health Branch, Population Health Data and Statistics, Queens-
land Government, Fact Sheet 2002.
12] T. Narasaiah, D. S. Rao, S. Rasheed, G. Madhava, D. Srinivasulu,
B. P. Naidu, C. N. Raju, Pharm. Lett. 2012, 4, 854.
13] T. Ito, T. Uchida, K. Tanabe, H. Yamada, S. Nishimoto, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. 2011, 219, 115.
[
[
[
[
0.01 kcal/mol using Site Finder. For 1EVE, the active site of
the prepared enzyme was defined as the residues within 10 Å
of the reference ligand (donepezil). However, for 1P0I (BChE),
the enzyme was searched for its active site and dummy atoms
were created using alpha spheres as centroids. A key trypto-
phan residue in AChE, Trp84 (TcAChE numbering), is con-
served in BChE (Trp82). The backbone and residues were kept
fixed and the energy minimization was performed. The lowest
energy minimized pose was used for further analysis. Ligand-
interaction module of MOE was used to calculate the 2D
ligand-enzyme interactions. The view of the docking results
and analysis of their surface with graphical representations
were done using MOE and a discovery studio visualizer.
[14] K. F. Ansari, C. Lal, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 4028.
[
[
15] V. L. R. Sana, V. R. Katla, S. Chennamsetty, A. Shaik, N. R. Chamarthi,
Der Pharm. Sin. 2013, 4, 10.
16] M. Danish, M. N. Tahir, U. Anwar, M. A. Raza, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E
2015, 71(Pt 4), o267.
[
[
17] M. Sahin, G. Gece, F. Karci, S. Bilgic, J. Appl. Electrochim. 2008, 38, 809.
18] A. A. H. Kadhum, A. A. Al-Amiery, A. Y. Musa, A. Mohamad, Int.
J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5747.
[19] P. K. Chattaraj, B. Maiti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2705.
[
20] A. A. H. Kadhum, A. A. Al-Amiery, M. Shikara, A. Mohamad, Int.
J. Phys. Sci. 2011, 6, 6692.
[
21] S. Liu, J. Chem. Sci. 2005, 117, 477.
[
22] M. Alam, M. J. Alam, A. A. S. Nami, L. Dong-Ung, A. Mohammad,
S. Ahmad, J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1108, 411.
[
[
23] D. Shahwar, M. A. Raza, A. Rehman, J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 1420.
24] M. A. Abbasi, M. Ilyas, A. Rehmana, A. Sonia, D. Shahwara, M. A. Raza,
K. M. Khan, M. Ashraf, I. Afzal, N. Ambreen, Sci. Iran. 2012, 19, 1580.
25] A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
[
[
7.7 | Computational studies
26] C. Lee, W. Yang, G. R. Parr, Phys. Rev B 1988, 37, 785.
Geometry optimization was carried out for all synthesized
compounds having nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon in their
structure. We used the hybrid Becke 3-parameter exchange
functional together with the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation func-
tional (B3LYP) in density functional theory calculations.
The 6–31g basis set was used for C, H, N, and oxygen
How to cite this article: Danish M, Raza MA,
Anwar U, Rashid U, Ahmed Z. Differential functional
theory and molecular docking studies of newly syn-
[
25,26]
atoms.
The DFT calculations were carried out using
Gaussian 09 software. The initial geometries of RZ3 were
obtained from the crystallographic data.