4
194
D. C. Blakemore, L. A. Marples / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 4192–4195
Pd dba
F3C
+
cross-coupling methodology to synthesise the key trimethylsilyl-
containing intermediates is highly desirable.
2
3
Johnphos
F3C
F3C
KF, H
DMF
2
O
N
SiMe3
N
Me Si
It is interesting to note that the synthesis of triethoxysilylaryl
compounds by cross-coupling of aryl bromide and triethoxysilane
+
3
N
SiMe3
N
Br
CF3
1
5
8
9
(12) is precedented using bis(acetonitrile)(1,5-cyclooctadiene)
rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate as catalyst. When these conditions
were applied to the synthesis of pyridyl derivative 13 the product
was obtained in 80% isolated yield. However, applying these condi-
tions to the synthesis of 2-triethylsilylpyridine (15) using 2-bro-
mopyridine and triethylsilane failed to give any reaction (Scheme
7
10
Scheme 3. Attempted synthesis of 2-trimethylsilyl-5-trifluoromethylpyridine.
Rh(cod)(MeCN)2
TBAI, Et N
DMF
3
4).
+
HSi(OEt)3
Cross-coupling of aryltriethoxysilanes with aryl halides is
N
Br
N
Si(OEt)
3
16
known in the literature. Although 2-pyridine triethoxysilane
13) is a known compound, there are no examples of it being used
1
1
12
13, 80%
(
1
6
in coupling reactions. Initial attempts at using Zhang’s base-cat-
alysed conditions for this coupling gave no reaction, however, the
Murata conditions gave the desired cross-coupled product in 11%
Rh(cod)(MeCN)2
TBAI, Et N
DMF
3
12
+
HSiEt3
N
SiEt3
N
Br
yield (Scheme 5). Further optimisation of this reaction is ongoing
to identify if workable yields can be obtained.
11
14
15, 0%
Good to excellent yields have been obtained for the Hiyama
coupling of 2-trimethylsilylpyridine with a range of aryl and het-
eroaryl halides. The major limitation for this reaction is currently
the synthesis of heteroarylsilane. The cross-coupling of 2-trieth-
oxysilylpyridine may also be a viable alternative as synthesis of
the required silane intermediates appears to be reliable.
Scheme 4. Rhodium-mediated synthesis of 2-triethoxysilyl-pyridine.
Pd(dppf)Cl .CH Cl
2
TBAF.H O
Toluene
2
2
O
2
N
+
N
Si(OEt)3
Br
Supplementary data
O
13
2
3, 11%
Scheme 5. Attempted cross-coupling of 13 with 2.
References and notes
4
3% of the desired material. For the chloro analogue the catalyst
loading needed to be increased to 10 mol % to obtain a 55% yield
of 6. The success of our Hiyama coupling in allowing these highly
desirable pyridyl–pyridyl couplings is a considerable advantage
for this methodology.
The scope of the coupling reaction with 2-trimethylsilylpyridine
was investigated with a range of aryl and heteroaryl halides (Table
1. (a) Tatsuo, I.; Kousaku, I.; Norio, M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9813–9816; (b)
Fuller, A. A.; Hester, H. R.; Salo, E. V.; Stevens, E. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
2935–2938; (c) Lützen, S.; Hapke, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2292–2297.
2
.
.
(a) Fray, M. J.; Mathiasa, J. P.; Nichols, C. L.; Po-Ba, Y. M.; Snow, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 6365–6368; (b) Lee, S. H.; Jang, B. B.; Kafafi, Z. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 9071–9078.
3
For a review on 2-pyridyl cross-couplings, see: Campeau, L.-C.; Fagnou, K.
Chem. Soc. Rev 2007, 36, 1058–1068.
1) and appeared to be general. For the aryl halides, the yields were
4. (a) Guetz, G.; Luetzen, A. Synthesis 2010, 85–90; (b) Yang, D. X.; Colletti, S. L.;
Wu, K.; Song, M.; Li, G. Y.; Shen, H. C. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 381–384; (c) Deng, J. Z.;
Paone, D. V.; Ginnetti, A. T.; Kurihara, H.; Dreher, S. D.; Weissman, S. A.;
Stauffer, S. R.; Burgey, C. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 345–347; (d) Knapp, D. M.; Gillis,
E. P.; Burke, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6961–6963; (e) Ackermann, L.;
Potukuchi, H. K. Synlett 2009, 2852–2856; (f) Billingsley, K. L.; Buchwald, S. L.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4695–4698; (g) Billingsley, K.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3358–3366; (h) Hodgson, P. B.; Salingue, F. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 685–687; (i) Bouillon, A.; Lancelot, J.-C.; Sopkova de
Oliveira Santos, J.; Collot, V.; Bovy, P. R.; Rault, S. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 10043–
good to excellent for both electron-neutral and electron-rich sys-
tems; yields were reduced for electron-poor and sterically hin-
dered aryl halides. Reactions of heterocycles are generally lower
yielding; however, good yields could be obtained when electron-
donating substituents were present. Additionally, aryl bromides
generally gave improved yields over the corresponding aryl io-
dides, due to a reduction in the amount of the homo-coupled by-
product 4 produced.
10049; (j) Deshayes, K.; Broene, R. D.; Chao, I.; Knobler, C. B.; Diederich, F. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 6787–6795; (k) Knapp, D. M.; Gillis, E. P.; Burke, M. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 131, 6961–6963.
To expand the scope of the reaction, a range of substituted 2-
trimethylsilylpyridines need to be synthesisable. Typically, the
synthesis of 2-trimethylsilylpyridines is carried out by halogen-
metal exchange followed by treatment with chlorotrimethylsi-
5. (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Takizawa, M.; Yu, X. Q.; Miuaura, N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 928–931; (b) Dick, G. R.; Knapp, D. M.; Gillis, E. P.; Burke, M. D. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 2314–2317.
6.
(a) Coleridge, B. M.; Bello, C. S.; Ellenberger, D. H.; Leitner, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2010, 51, 357–359; (b) Kima, S.; Rieke, R. D. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 3135–3146;
1
3
lane. However, this method is not suitable for base-sensitive sub-
strates or compounds susceptible to nucleophilic attack. An
alternative method using metal-catalysed coupling of heteroaryl
halides with a silane source is desirable. Synthesis of aryl silanes
(
c) Calimsiz, S.; Sayah, M.; Mallik, D.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010,
9, 2014–2017; (d) Luzung, M. R.; Patel, J. S.; Yin, J. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 8330–
332.
7. (a) Rieke, R. D. Science 1989, 246, 1260; (b) Rieke, R. D. Aldrichim. Acta 2000, 33,
2–60.
4
8
5
by palladium-catalysed cross-coupling of the halide with hexam-
ethyldisilane (8) is precedented14; however, applying this method-
8.
(a) Pierrat, P.; Gros, P.; Fort, Y. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 697–700; (b) Louërat, F.; Gros,
P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3558–3560.
ology to 2-bromo-5-trifluoromethylpyridine (7) resulted in
formation of the symmetrical homo-coupled by-product (10)
9. (a) Napier, S.; Marcuccio, S. M.; Tye, H.; Whittaker, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008,
49, 6314–6315; (b) Louërat, F.; Tye, H.; Napier, S.; Garrigou, M.; Whittaker, M.;
Gros, P. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1768–1773.
(
9
38%), with only trace amounts of the desired silane intermediate
, and some unreacted starting bromide remaining (Scheme 3). At-
1
0. Hassan, J.; Gozzi, C.; Lemaire, M. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Serie IIc, Chimie: Chemistry
000, 3, 517–521.
11. Seganish, W. M.; Mowery, M. E.; Riggleman, S.; DeShong, P. Tetrahedron 2005,
1, 2117–2121.
2. Murata, M.; Yoshida, S.; Nirei, S.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. Synlett 2006, 118–
20.
2
tempts at optimisation via catalyst screen, base screen and varying
the reaction time, gave mainly by-product. This is a limitation of
the current procedure and identification of a metal-catalysed
6
1
1