Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.11 (2004)
1527
of the catalyst. However, the imines (prepared separately) when
treated with the dihydropyran or furan using ZrCl4 formed the
desired quinolines in high yields.
dron Lett., 45, 2425 (2004).
8
General experimental procedure for the preparation of pyar-
ano- and furoquinolines: To a solution of an aniline
(1 mmol), a benzaldehyde (1 mmol) and 3,4-dihydro-2H-
pyran or 2,3-dihydrofuran (0.1 mL) in CH3CN (10 mL)
was added ZrCl4 (0.1 equiv., 0.1 mmol). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature and the reaction was monitored
by TLC. After completion the mixture was filtered and the
filtrate was concentrated to a viscous mass. This was subject-
ed to column chromatography on silica gel and the column
was eluted with hexane-EtOAc (20:1) to produce the pyrano-
or furoquinolines. The spectral data of some representative
pyrano- and furoquinolines are given here: 4b: mp 145–
146 ꢁC; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 7.32 (2H, d, J ¼
8:0 Hz), 7.18 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.04 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz),
6.84 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.64 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.45
(1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 4.64 (1H, d, J ¼ 10:0 Hz), 4.36 (1H,
d, J ¼ 2:5 Hz), 4.06 (1H, m), 3.97 (1H, d, J ¼ 3:0 Hz),
3.82 (3H,s), 3.63 (1H, t, J ¼ 10:0 Hz), 2.02 (1H, m), 1.82
(1H, m), 1.64 (1H, m), 1.44 (1H, m), 1.28 (1H, m); FABMS:
m=z 296 (Mþ þ 1). 5b: mp 154–155 ꢁC; 1H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3): ꢀ 7.38 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.30 (2H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.00 (1H, m), 6.82 (2H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.77
(1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.50 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 5.26 (1H, d,
J ¼ 3:0 Hz), 4.60 (1H, d, J ¼ 3:0 Hz), 3.84 (1H, m), 3.82
(3H, s), 3.58 (1H, m), 3.22 (1H, m), 2.04 (1H, m), 1.58–
1.30 (4H, m); FABMS: m=z 296 (Mþ þ 1). 4d: mp 152–
153 ꢁC; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 7.18 (1H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.04 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.92 (1H, d, J ¼
2:5 Hz), 6.84–6.62 (3H, m), 6.46 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 5.96
(2H, s), 4.62 (1H, d, J ¼ 10:0 Hz), 4.36 (1H, d, J ¼
3:5 Hz), 4.10 (1H, m), 3.98 (1H, brs), 3.70 (1H, m), 2.02
(1H, m), 1.85–1.22 (4H, m); FABMS: m=z 310 (Mþ þ 1).
5d: mp 159–160 ꢁC; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 7.38
(1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.04 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.92–6.76
(4H, m), 6.56 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 5.96 (2H, s), 5.24 (1H,
d, J ¼ 6:0 Hz), 4.60 (1H, d, J ¼ 3:0 Hz), 3.78 (1H, brs),
3.60–3.38 (2H, m), 2.05 (1H, m), 1.60–1.38 (4H, m);
ZrCl4, as well as some catalysts examined here, is easily
available and less costly. Industrially its catalytic applications
are recently steadily increasing.9 Multicomponent reactions are
also of growing importance in current organic synthesis owing
to their speed, diversity, and efficiency. ZrCl4 is thus a very suit-
able catalyst for single-step synthesis of pyrano- or furanoquino-
lines from the three components, anilines, benzaldehydes and
3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran- or 2,3-dihydrofuran.
In conclusion, we have applied novel and highly efficient
catalysts for simple one-pot synthesis of pyrano- and furoquino-
lines in high yields and high diastereoselectivity. The present
process may be a useful attractive alternative to the existing
methods for the synthesis of quinoline derivatives.
The authors thank CSIR, New Delhi, for financial assis-
tance.
References and Notes
1
Part 45 in the series, ‘‘Studies on novel synthetic methodol-
ogies’’ IICT Communication No. 041016.
2
a) K. Faber, H. Stueckler, and T. Kappe, Heterochemistry,
21, 1171 (1984). b) J. V. Johnson, S. Rauckman, P. D.
Beccanari, and B. Roth, J. Med. Chem., 32, 1942 (1989).
M. Ramesh, P. S. Mohan, and P. Shanmugam, Tetrahedron,
40, 4041 (1984).
a) D. L. Boger and S. M. Weinreb, ‘‘Hetero Diels-Alder
Methodology in Organic Synthesis,’’ Academic Press, San
Diego (1987), Chap. 2 and 9. b) S. M. Weinreb, ‘‘Compre-
hensive Organic Synthesis,’’ ed. by B. M. Trost and I.
Fleming, Pergamon, Oxford (1991), Vol. 5, pp 401–449.
a) J. Cabral, P. Laszlo, and M. T. Montaufier, Tetrahedron
Lett., 29, 547 (1988). b) G. Balu and P. T Perumal, Tetrahe-
dron Lett., 39, 3225 (1988). c) J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy,
R. Srinivas, Ch. Madhuri, and T. Ramalingam, Synlett, 2001,
240.
3
4
5
1
6
7
Y. Ma, C. Qian, M. Xie, and J. Sun, J. Org. Chem., 64, 62
(1999).
FABMS: m=z 310 (Mþ þ 1). 4k: mp 148–149 ꢁC; H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 7.35 (4H,s), 7.14 (1H, d, J ¼
8:0 Hz), 7.05 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.64 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz),
6.42 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 4.58 (1H, d, J ¼ 5:0 Hz), 4.08
(1H, m), 3.85–3.42 (2H, m), 2.45 (1H, m), 2.00 (1H, m),
1.72 (1H, m); FABMS: m=z 286 (Mþ þ 1). 5k: mp 152–
153 ꢁC; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ 7.40 (1H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.36 (4H, s), 7.05 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.68
(1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 6.41 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 5.25 (1H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 4.65 (1H, d, J ¼ 3:0 Hz), 3.78 (1H, brs),
3.62–3.40 (2H, m), 2.18 (1H, m), 1.62–1.50 (2H, m);
FABMS: m=z 286 (Mþ þ 1).
a) C. Ramesh, G. Mahender, N. Ravindranath, and B.
Das, Tetrahedron Lett., 44, 1465 (2003). b) C. Ramesh, G.
Mahender, N. Ravindranath, and B. Das, Tetrahedron, 59,
1049 (2003). c) K. V. N. S. Srinivas and B. Das, J. Org.
Chem., 68, 1165 (2003). d) G. Mahender, R. Ramu, C.
Ramesh, and B. Das, Chem. Lett., 32, 734 (2003). e) C.
Ramesh, J. Banerjee, R. Pal, and B. Das, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
345, 557 (2003). f) C. Ramesh, N. Ravindranath, and B.
Das, J. Org. Chem., 68, 7101 (2003). g) K. V. N. S. Srinivas,
I. Mahender, and B. Das, Synlett, 2003, 2419. h) B. Das,
J. Banerjee, N. Ravindranath, and B. Venkataiah, Tetrahe-
9
A. K. Chakraborti and R. Gulhane, Synlett, 2004, 627.
Published on the web (Advance View) October 27, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.1526