8 of 9
RADFAR ET AL.
REFERENCES
[1] A. W. Thomas, S. V. Ley, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400.
[2] H. Yang, C. Xi, Z. Miao, R. Chen, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011,
3353.
[3] S. E. Allen, R. R. Walvoord, R. P. Salinas, M. C. Kozlowski,
Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6234.
[4] J. Finet, A. Y. Federov, S. Combes, G. Boyer, Curr. Org. Chem.
2002, 6, 597.
[5] N. Esfandiary, A. Nakisa, K. Azizi, J. Azarnia, I. Radfar, A.
Heydari, Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2017, 31, 3641.
[6] R. Carlisle, Scientific American Inventions and Discoveries, John
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ 2004 338.
FIGURE 6 Catalyst reusability
[7] Y. Mikhlin, S. Vorobyev, S. Saikova, Y. Tomashevich, O.
Fetisova, S. Kozlova, S. Zharkov, New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3059.
Sustainability is one of the important properties of a
heterogeneous catalyst. So, this character of the synthe-
sized nanocatalyst was investigated in the model reac-
tions. It was observed that the catalyst can be reused at
least five times without significant loss in yields of the
products 1a (N), 6b (O) and 1c (S) (Figure 6). Previous
work has been carried out concerning the Ullmann reac-
tion applying different metal‐based catalysts.[23–29]
[8] A. D. Sagar, R. H. Tale, R. N. Adude, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
7061.
[9] H. M. Petrassi, K. B. Sharpless, J. W. Kelly, Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
139.
[10] S. Rostamnia, E. Doustkhah, R. Bulgar, B. Zeynizadeh,
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2016, 225, 272.
[11] H.‐J. Xu, Y.‐Q. Zhao, T. Feng, Y.‐S. Feng, J. Org. Chem. 2012,
77, 2878.
[12] J. Cai, J. Cai, P. Zheng, X. Wang, X. Zhao, RSC Adv. 2017, 7,
256.
4 | CONCLUSIONS
[13] Z.‐H. Yang, Y.‐L. An, Y. Chen, Z.‐Y. Shao, S.‐Y. Zhao, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 3869.
In summary, we used xanthate hook to stabilize a copper‐
based catalyst according to Mikhlin's instruction and the
catalyst was completely characterized. Then, the perfor-
mance of the Fe3O4@SiO2‐CSX nanoparticles as a hetero-
geneous catalyst was investigated in three types of C–X
cross‐coupling reactions. The desired products were
obtained good to high yields. Also, the catalyst was reli-
able after being used several times. It is a noteworthy
advantage that the current catalyst utilizes less amount
of copper when compared with previous reports involving
stoichiometric amounts for each coupling reaction. Such
an advantage is accompanied with drawbacks like copper
leaching during recycling steps and long reaction times.
[14] W.‐K. Huang, W.‐T. Chen, I.‐J. Hsu, C.‐C. Han, S.‐G. Shyu,
RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 4912.
[15] S. Jammi, P. Barua, L. Rout, P. Saha, T. Punniyamurthy, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1484.
[16] K. S. Sindhu, A. P. Thankachan, A. M. Thomas, G. Anilkumar,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 4923.
[17] S. Koley, S. Chowdhury, T. Chanda, B. J. Ramulu, N. Anand,
M. Shankar Singh, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015, 409.
[18] Z. Tber, M.‐A. Hiebela, M. Akssira, G. Guillaumet, S.
Berteina‐Raboin, Synthesis 2015, 47, 1.
[19] E. Yazdani, A. Nakisa, A. Heydari, Org. Chem. Res. 2015, 1, 27.
[20] A. Patterson, Phys. Rev. 1939, 56, 978.
[21] D. M. T. Chan, K. L. Monaco, R.‐P. Wang, M. P. Winter, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2933.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge Tarbiat Modares
University for partial support of this work.
[22] P. S. Herradura, K. A. Pendola, R. K. Guy, Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2019.
[23] A. Ghorbani‐Choghamarani, Z. Seydyosefi, B. Tahmasbi, Appl.
Organometal. Chem. 2018, 32, 4396.
ORCID
[24] E. A. Lewis, M. D. Marcinkowski, C. J. Murphy, M. L. Liriano,
A. J. Therrien, A. Pronschinske, E. C. H. Sykes, Chem.
Commun. 2017, 53, 7816.
[25] F. Ferlin, V. Trombettoni, L. Luciani, S. Fusi, O. Piermatti, S.
Santoro, L. Vaccaro, Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1634.
Naghmeh Esfandiary
[26] Q. Fan, L. Liu, J. Dai, T. Wang, H. Ju, J. Zhao, J. Kuttner, G.
Hilt, J. M. Gottfried, J. Zhu, ACS Nano 2267, 2018, 3.