September 2011
1177
eluted with distilled water (100 ml) and MeOH (100 ml), successively. The
elute with MeOH was concentrated to afford methyl glucopyranoside
(2.2 mg). The optical rotation recorded for methyl glucopyranoside isolated
in this study was [a]D ꢄ64 (cꢁ0.22, MeOH), which showed methyl D-glu-
copyranoside in 1 (ref 13): [a]D20 ꢄ70.8). The obtained methyl D-glucopyra-
noside was refluxed with 10% aq. H2SO4 (1 ml) for 2 h, and the reaction
mixture was neutralized with NaHCO3 and concentrated in vacuo. The reac-
tion solid was dissolved in H2O (10 ml), and then purified by Diaion HP-20
column, as described above, to yield D-glucose (1.1 mg) as a colorless syrup:
[a]D ꢄ51 (cꢁ0.1, H2O) [ref. 14): [a]D20 ꢄ52.7].
Methanolysis of 2 The methnolysis of 2 was carried out similarly to 1,
and furnished a FAME (methyl-2-hydroxyocadec-3-enoic acid, 1.0 mg), tri-
acetyl LCSB, and methyl glucopyranoside. The optical rotation and FAB-
MS of FAME were [a]D ꢀ50 (cꢁ0.06, CHCl3); FAB-MS m/z 335 [MꢄNa]ꢄ
(100), 317 (0.30), 305 (0.12), 291 (0.15), 277 (0.18), 263 (0.2), 249 (0.21),
235 (0.18), 221 (0.14), 207 (0.12), 191 (0.16), 177 (0.16), 165 (0.26), 152
(0.76). The physicochemical data for methyl glucopyranoside and triacetyl
LCSB were identical with those of 1.
versed-phase analytical column (Gemini C18, 4.6ꢅ250 mm, 5 mm) with UV
detection.
Fungal Isolation and Culture The fungal strain, Aspergillus flavus,
was isolated from the surface of the edible green algae, Codium fragile (Ko-
rean name: CheongGak), collected in GeoMun Island, Yeosu, Korea and
identified based on 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) analyses (SolGent Co.,
Ltd., Daejeon, Korea), identity of 99%. A voucher specimen is deposited at
Pukyong National University with the code MFA500. The fungus was cul-
tured in 2.8-l Fernbach flasks (10ꢅ1 l) at first, and then additionally cultured
two times more in culture medium consisting of soytone (0.1%), soluble
starch (1.0%), and seawater (100%). The cultures were incubated at 29 °C
for 20 d on the static condition.
Extraction and Isolation Each culture was filtered through cheesecloth
to yield broth and mycelium residue, and the resulted broth and mycelium
were extracted with EtOAc and CH2Cl2–MeOH (1 : 1) to afford broth extract
(1.9 g) and mycelium extract (2.7 g), respectively. Both extracts exhibited an-
tibacterial activity against S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and mul-
tidrug-resistant S. aureus. So, we combined both extracts, and subjected to
Si gel flash chromatography. Elution was performed with CH2Cl2–MeOH
(stepwise, 0—100% MeOH) to yield eight fractions. Fractions 2 and 7,
which exhibited antibacterial activity against S. aureus, methicillin-resistant
S. aureus, and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, were separated by medium-
pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) [octadesyl silica (ODS)] using a
H2O–MeOH gradient elution to afford crude compound 3 and compounds 1
and 2, respectively. They were further purified by recycling HPLC (Gemini
C18, 4.6ꢅ250 mm, 5 mm, 1 ml/min) utilizing a 30 min gradient program of
50 to 100% MeOH in H2O to furnish 1 (16.5 mg), 2 (12 mg), and 3 (15 mg),
respectively. Compounds 4 (105 mg), 5 (15 mg), and 6 (21 mg) were isolated
from fraction 5 by the same chromatographic method above.
Antibacterial Assay The in vitro antibacterial activity of the extract and
purified samples were evaluated by a conventional 2-fold serial dilution
method using S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and multidrug-resist-
ant S. aureus as indicator strains. A 5 ml suspension containing 105 cells per
ml was used as inoculum of the test organism. The MIC values were deter-
mined after the inoculation for 18 h at 37 °C.16)
Acknowledgment This research was supported by the National Re-
search Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government
(MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund) (KRF-2008-314-F00048).
Mass spectral data were kindly provided by the Korea Basic Science Insti-
tute. Pukyong National University in the 2010 Post-Doc. Program to LS and
the second Brain Korea 21 Graduate Fellowship Grant to students are grate-
fully acknowledged (09B2519).
Flavuside A (1): was obtained as a colorless amorphous solid; [a]D20 ꢄ5
(cꢁ0.55, MeOH); IR (neat) nmax 3333, 2921, 2851, 1733, 1641, 1541, 1468,
1278, 1248, 1079, 1029, 966, 721 cmꢀ1; UV lmax (MeOH) (log e) 199 (4.1)
1
nm; H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz):
see the Table 1; LR-FAB-MS m/z: 778 [MꢄNa]ꢄ (100), 760
[MꢄNaꢀH2O]ꢄ (0.4), 496 [MꢄNaꢀfatty acid]ꢄ (5), 396 (5), 348 (2), 244
(0.3), 203 (0.1), and 185 (0.3); HR-FAB-MS m/z: 778.5823 [MꢄNa]ꢄ
(Calcd for C43H81NO9Na, 778.5809) (D ꢄ1.8 ppm).
References
1) Jensen P. R., Fenical W., “Marine Microorganisms and Drug Discov-
ery: Current Status and Future Potential, Drugs from the Sea,” ed. by
Fusetani N., Karger, Basel, 2000, pp. 6—29.
2) Feng Z., Leutou A. S., Yang G., Nenkep V. N., Siwe X. N., Choi H. D.,
Kang J. S., Son B. W., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 30, 2345—2350
(2009).
3) Nenkep V., Yun K., Zhang D., Choi H. D., Kang J. S., Son B. W., J.
Nat. Prod., 73, 2061—2063 (2010).
4) Li X., Jeong J. H., Lee K. T., Rho J. R., Choi H. D., Kang J. S., Son B.
W., Arch. Pharm. Res., 26, 532—534 (2003).
5) Bock K., Pederson C., “Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Bio-
chemistry,” Vol. 41, ed. by Jipson R. S., Horfon D., Academic Press,
New York, 1983, pp. 27—46.
6) Costantino V., Fattorusso E., Mangoni A., Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1995,
2133—2136 (1995).
7) Jin W., Rinehart K. L., Jares-Erjiman A. E., J. Org. Chem., 59, 144—
147 (1994).
8) Chen J. H., Cui G. Y., Liu J. Y., Tan R. X., Phytochemistry, 64, 903—
906 (2003).
Flavuside B (2): was obtained as a colorless amorphous solid; [a]D20 ꢀ8.3
(cꢁ0.4, MeOH); IR (neat) nmax 3327, 2923, 2853, 1739, 1651, 1538,
1467, 1378, 1241, 1078, 1032, 966, 721 cmꢀ1; UV lmax (MeOH) (log e)
199 (4.1) nm; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6,
100 MHz): see the Table 1; LR-FAB-MS m/z: 776 [MꢄNa]ꢄ (100), 758
[MꢄNaꢀH2O]ꢄ (0.7), 522 (0.1), 496 [MꢄNaꢀfatty acid]ꢄ (3), 346 (2),
348 (2), 244 (0.5), 203 (1), and 185 (0.3); HR-FAB-MS m/z: 776.5644
[MꢄNa]ꢄ (Calcd for C43H79NO9Na, 776.5653) (D ꢀ1.1 ppm).
Phomaligol A (3), kojic acid (4), and methyl kojic acids (5, 6): spectro-
scopic data were virtually identical to those reported in the literature.4)
Methanolysis of 1 A solution of 1 (10.0 mg) in 9% HCl in MeOH
(2.0 ml) was refluxed at 90 °C for 10 h (N2 atmosphere). The reaction mix-
ture was neutralized with Ag2CO3 and filtrated. The residue, obtained by re-
moval of the solvent, was partitioned into MeOH (10 ml) and hexane (10 ml)
to give the hexane phase and the MeOH phase. The hexane layer was evapo-
rated under N2, and purified by Si gel flash chromatography. Elution was
performed with hexane–EtOAc (stepwise, 0—100% EtOAc) yielded the
FAME of 1 (1.0 mg): [a]D ꢀ62 (cꢁ0.1, CHCl3); FAB-MS m/z 337
[MꢄNa]ꢄ (100), 321 (0.17), 307 (0.15), 293 (0.22), 279 (0.28), 265 (0.24),
251 (0.22), 237 (0.24), 223 (0.25), 209 (0.22), 195 (0.20), 181 (0.16), 167
(0.22), 153 (0.1), 139 (0.11), 125 (0.35), 112 (0.62). The MeOH layer was
concentrated, and the residue was partitioned into EtOAc and H2O. The
EtOAc portion was dried, and peracetylated by using acetic anhydride
(0.5 ml) in pyridine (1 ml) at r.t. for 10 h (N2 atmosphere). The reaction mix-
ture was dried, and subjected to Si gel flash chromatography [hexane–EtOAc
(stepwise, 0—100% EtOAc)] to yield triacetyl LCSB of 1 (3.1 mg): [a]D
9) Wang W., Wang Y., Tao H., Peng X., Liu P., Zhu W., J. Nat. Prod., 72,
1695—1698 (2009).
10) Sarmientos F., Schwarzmann G., Sandhoff K., Eur. J. Biochem., 146,
59—64 (1985).
11) Sugimura H., Yoshida K., J. Org. Chem., 58, 4484—4486 (1993).
12) Tkaczuk P., Thornton E. R., J. Org. Chem., 46, 4393—4398 (1981).
13) Mansoor T. A., Shinde P. B., Luo X., Hong J., Lee C.-O., Sim C. J.,
Son B. W., Jung J. H., J. Nat. Prod., 70, 1481—1486 (2007), and refer-
ences therein.
14) Budavari S., O’Neil M. J., Smith A., Heckelman P. E., Kinneary J. F.
(eds.), “The Merck Index, an Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and
Biologicals,” Twelfth Ed., Merck & Co., New Jersey, 1996, p. 4465.
15) Li H., Lin Y., Liu X., Zhou S., Vrijmoed L. L. P., Marine Sciences, 26,
57—59 (2002).
1
ꢄ4.2 (cꢁ0.3, CHCl3); H-NMR (CDCl3) dH 0.87 (3H, t, Jꢁ6.7 Hz, H3-18),
1.25 (14H, br s), 1.57 (3H, s, H3-19), 2.00—2.15 (6H, m), 2.01, 2.04, 2.07
(each 3H, s, three Ac), 3.99 (1H, m), 4.19 (1H, m), 4.32 (1H, m), 4.83—
4.87 (1H, m), 5.40 (1H, t, Jꢁ7.0 Hz), 5.46 (1H, dd, Jꢁ16.0, 9.5 Hz), 5.97
(1H, dt, Jꢁ16.0, 7.0 Hz). The H2O portion was applied to a Diaion HP-20
column (Mitsubishi Kasei, 20 ml of resin, 10ꢅ250 mm). The column was
16) Li Y., Li X., Son B. W., Choi H. D., Korean J. Pharmacogn., 34, 142—
144 (2003).