448
Struct Chem (2012) 23:441–449
3 in Scheme 2 and Fig. 4 demonstrate, trans-1 decomposed
initially faster than cis-1 in the crystal. Recently, we have
reported another topochemical factor that a locally narrow
and rigid reaction cavity due to p–p interactions between the
neighboring aryl planes plays a crucial role in suppressing
the solid-state photoreactivity of as many as seventeen 2,4,6-
trialkylbenzophenones, where alkyl is i-Pr, Et, or Me and the
corresponding benzocyclobutenols are formed [47]. Now
from inspection of the crystal packing of trans-1 and cis-1, it
has become noticed that a similar Ph–Ph p–p overlap exists
for the cis-1 crystal as shown in Fig. 3, but does not for the
trans-1 crystal. Furthermore, from the list of Table 1, cis-1
(Dc 1.209 g/cm3) is more densely packed than trans-1 (Dc
1.169 g/cm3) (Dc 1.172 and 1.132 g/cm3, respectively, at
0 °C). Hence, we propose that the topochemical restriction
of molecular motions by the p–p interaction between the
neighboring Ph planes [47] and the higher crystal packing
[36–39] may be responsible for the observed lower photo-
reactivity of the cis-1 crystal as compared with the trans-1
crystal. However, it must be warned that many other factors
such as defects, surface effects, different extent of light
scattering, particle sizes, formation of different solid–solid
mixtures/eutectic solutions are known to influence the solid-
state reactivity [48–51], but the influences by these factors
were not experimentally investigated in this brief report.
Data Centre (CCDC), 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ,
UK; fax: 144(0) 1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.
ac.uk).
Acknowledgments The authors are indebted to Professor Yoshiki
Matsuura (Osaka University), who first solved the crystal structure of
trans-1. We also thank Dr. Sadayuki Asaoka for his assistance in
doing photolysis experiments.
References
1. Ihmels H, Scheffer JR (1999) Tetrahedron 55:885–907
2. Braga D, Chen S, Filson H, Maini L, Netherton MR, Patrick BO,
Scheffer JR, Scott C, Xia W (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:3511–
3520
3. Scheffer JR, Xia WJ (2005) Top Curr Chem 254:233–262
4. Tanaka K, Toda F (2000) Chem Rev 100:1025–1074
5. Toda F, Tanaka K, Miyamoto H (2001) In: Schanze KS (ed)
Understanding and manipulating excited-state processes, vol 8.
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, p. 385
6. MacGillivray LR (2008) J Org Chem 73:3311–3317
7. MacGillivray LR, Papaefstathiou GS, Friscic T, Hamilton TD,
Bucar DK, Chu Q, Varshney DB, Georgiev IG (2008) Acc Chem
Res 41:280–291
8. Georgiev IG, MacGillivray LR (2007) Chem Soc Rev 36:
1239–1248
9. Lauher JW, Fowler FW, Goroff NS (2008) Acc Chem Res 41:
1215–1229
10. Kim HS, Shibata Y, Wataya Y, Tsuchiya K, Masuyama A,
Nojima MJ (1999) J Med Chem 42:2604–2609
11. Vennerstrom JL, Fu HN, Ellis WY, Ager AL Jr, Wood JK,
Andersen SL, Gerena L, Milhous WK (1992) J Med Chem
35:3023–3027
Conclusion
12. O’Neill PM, Amewu RK, Nixon GL, ElGarah FB, Mungthin M,
Chadwick J, Shone AE, Vivas L, Lander H, Barton V, Muang-
noicharoen S, Bray PG, Davies J, Park BK, Wittlin S, Brun R,
Preschel M, Zhang K, Ward SA (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed
49:5693–5697
13. Kim HS, Tsuchiya K, Shibata Y, Wataya Y, Ushigoe Y, Mas-
uyama A, Nojima M, McCullough KJ (1999) J Chem Soc Perkin
Trans 1(13):1867–1870
The crystal structures of valerophenone diperoxides trans-1
andcis-1 weresuccessfullysolvedat-173 °C. The molecular
structures of both the compounds adopt chair conformations.
In the crystal of cis-1, the molecular structure showed whole-
molecule disorder. The thermal parameters for all atoms of
cis-1 were slightly larger than those of trans-1.
Solid-state photolysis (with 254 nm light at 0 °C) or
solution-state thermolysis (at 150 °C) of trans-1 and cis-1
produced valerophenone (2) and butyl benzoate (3) with
the molar ratio 2/3 of 1.5–10. The observed lower 2/3
selectivity for cis-1 than that for trans-1 in the solid state
was not explicable by the present X-ray structures. The
lower solid-state photoreactivity of cis-1 as compared with
trans-1 at the initial stage of photolysis was ascribed to the
former’s locally narrow and rigid reaction cavity due to the
p–p overlap between the neighboring Ph planes.
14. Badawi HM, Al-Saadi AA, Ali AS (2010) J Mol Struct
969:197–203
15. Ito Y, Konishi M, Matsuura T (1979) Photochem Photobiol
30:53–57
16. Ito Y, Matsuura T, Yokoya H (1979) J Am Chem Soc
101:4010–4011
17. Ito Y, Yokoya H, Umehara Y, Matsuura T (1980) Bull Chem Soc
Jpn 53:2407–2408
18. Ito Y, Tone M, Yokoya H, Matsuura T, Schuster GB (1986) J Org
Chem 51:2240–2245
19. Altomare A, Burla M, Camalli M, Cascarano G, Giacovazzo C,
Guagliardi A, Moliterni A, Polidori G, Spagna R (1999) J Appl
Crystallogr 32:115–119
20. Sheldrick GM (2008) Acta Crystallogr A 64:112–122
21. CrystalStructure 3.8, Crystal Structure Analysis Package; Rigaku
and Rigaku Americas (2000–2007): 9009 New Trails Dr., The
Woodlands, TX 77381, USA
Supplementary data
22. Kabuto C, Akine S, Nemoto T, Kwon E (2009) J Cryst Soc Jpn
51:218–224
23. Macrae CF, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Shields GP,
Taylor R, Towler M, van de Streek J (2006) J Appl Crystallogr
39:453–457
CCDC-787284 (trans-1) and CCDC-787283 (cis-1) contain
the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These
123