Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C6CC00576D
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
observed at the second and third catalytic run (up to 25-26 %,
We are grateful for financial support from NSFC (Grant Nos.
entry 2-3, Table 2). We reasoned that the part of n-butyl 21475078 and 21271120), 973 Program (Grant Nos.
mercaptane intermedia was rapidly oxidized by the oxygen to 2012CB821705 and 2013CB933800) and the Taishan Scholar’s
form the dibutyldisulfide when the PTC reactions were carried Construction Project.
out in air.9 Indeed, when above reaction was carried out in
inert atmosphere, the selectivity toward dibutylsulfane was
Notes and references
largely enhanced (up to 97 %, entry 4, Table 2) and only tiny
amount of dibutyldisulfane was detected based on GC-MS
analysis (ESI). Although we distance ourselves from any type of
explanation and say forthright that we do not know why the
selectivity to dibutyldisulfide species in second and third
catalytic runs is enhanced, it might be caused by the catalytic
1
(a) C. M. Starks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 195. (b) K.
Maruoka and T. Ooi, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3013. (c) J.
Dupont, R. F. de Souza and P. A. Z. Suarez, Chem. Rev., 2002,
102, 3667. (d) J. Tan and N. Yasuda, Org. Process Res. Dev.,
2015, 19, 1731. (e) K. Maruoka, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2008,
12, 679.
activity decline of
2
2
Again, herein also exhibits
for thioetherfication after the first run.
heterogeneous catalytic
2
(a) M. Uyanik, H. Okamoto, T. Yasui and K. Ishara, Science,
2010, 328, 1376. (b) M. Uyanik, H. Hayashi and K. Ishihaba,
Science, 2014, 345, 291. (c) V. Rauniyar, A. Lackner, G. L.
Hamilton and F. D. Toste, Science, 2011, 334, 1681. (d) T. Ooi,
a
behaviour and can be collected by centrifugation after the
reaction and reused directly in the next catalytic run (ESI).
Notably, all the PTC reactions described herein needed no
additional organic solvents except for the reaction substrates.
Thus as this reaction is easy to manipulated and avoids the use
of toxic and volatile solvents, it could be considered as a clean
catalytic organic synthesis approach.
Y. Uematsu and K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128
,
2548. (e) K. Sharma, P. P. Wolstenhulme, D. Yeo, F. Grande-
Carmona, C. P. Johnston, D. J. Tantillo and M. D. Smith, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 13414. (f) S. Shirakawa, K. Liu and K.
Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 916. (g) S. E.
Denmark, R. C. Weintraub and N. D. Gould, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 134, 13415.
Table 3. Phase-transfer-catalyzed azidation and thiolation of 1-bromobutane catalyzed
by 3a
3
4
(a) S. Crossley, J. Faria, M. Shen and D. E. Resasco, Science,
2010, 327, 68. (b) A. D. Dinsomre, M. F. Hsu, M. G. Nikolaides,
M. Marquez, A. R. Bausch and D. A. Weitz, Science, 2002, 298
1006. (c) G. M. Whitesides and B. Grzybowski, Science, 2002,
295, 2418.
,
entry
conversion (%) b
83
selectivity (%) b
100
1
(azidation)
(a) M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 675.
(b) J.-R. Li, J. Sculley and H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112,
dibutylsulfane dibutyldisulfane
2
869. (c) Y. Cui, Y. Yue, G. Qian, and B. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2012,
112, 1126. (d) C. Wang, T. Zhang and W. Lin, Chem. Rev.,
2012, 112, 1084. (e) M. Yoon, R. Srirambalaji and K. Kim,
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1196.
81
(thiolation)
81
19
a Reaction conditions are the same as those of 2 except 3 was used instead of 2. b
5
(a) S. M. Cohen, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 970. (b) M. F. Lin, R.
Matsuda and S. Kitagawa, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 310. (c) C.
He, D. Liu and W. Lin, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 11079. (d) P.
Determined by GC-MS.
For further demonstrating above reactions are a PTC
process, Cd(II)-MOF-IM (3) with shorter propyl chains is used
Kaur, J. T. Hupp and S. T. Nguyen, ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 819. (e)
J. D. Evans, C. J. Sumby and C. J. Doonan, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
instead of to perform above reactions under the same
2
2014, 43, 5933.
A. Puratchikody and M. Doble, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2007, 15,
1083.
A N2 adsorption isotherm was first measured, but it exhibits
negligible uptake by the framework even at low temperature.
Such a phenomenon has been observed for some MOFs. See:
(a) K. Otsubo, Y. Wakabayashi, J. Ohara, S. Yamamoto, H.
Matsuzaki, H. Okamoto, K. Nitta, T. Uruga and H. Kitagawa,
Nat. Mater., 2011, 10, 291. (b) J. Y. Cheng, P. Wang, J.-P. Ma,
Q.-K. Liu and Y.-B. Dong, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 13672.
6
7
conditions. In principle, the phase transfer catalysts with
longer paraffin chains are more efficient due to their larger
extraction constant.10 The conversions of bromoalkane
azidation and thiolation catalyzed by
respectively, which are much lower than those of
3
are 83 and 81,
. The
2
selectivity for n-butyl azide is 100 %, while selectivity for
dibutylsulfane and dibutyldisulfane are 81 and 19 %,
respectively (Table 3). So the Cd(II)-MOF-IM with longer
paraffin chains is more efficient for these nucleophilic
reactions.
8
9
S. Soll, Q. Zhao, J. Weber and J. Yuan, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25
3003.
(a) J. P. Tam, C.-R. Wu, W. Liu and J.-W. Zhang, J. Am. Chem.
,
In conclusion, we report the first example of the
imidazolium-based MOFs via post-synthesis functionalization.
The obtained Cd(II)-MOF-IM can be highly active solid phase
transfer catalyst to promote the azidation and thiolation of
bromoalkane under PTC conditions. Our results herein
highlight the preliminary application of MOF-based triphase
transfer catalysts localized at the interface between two liquid
phases. We anticipate that tailoring such emulsion-stabilizing
MOFs solid particles decorated with additional catalytic
functional groups will facilitate a broad range of reactions
between two immiscible solvent phases.
Soc., 1991, 113, 6657. (b) Y. Zheng, L. Zhai, Y. Zhao and C. Wu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 15094.
10 G. E. Boyd and Q. V. Larson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89
6038.
,
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins