1826
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 57, No. 9, September, 2008
Ershov et al.
[X]/([I2–] + [Br2–] + [IBr–])
1.0
= 1.93 V, are 0.33 and 0.16 V, respectively. A slight differꢀ
ence between the potentials is favorable for the organizaꢀ
–
tion of a mixed orbital in BrI• and in ClBr•–. The differꢀ
ence in the potential values E0(Cl2 –/2Cl–) = 2.09 V and
•
–
•
–
•
Br2
I2
E0(I•/I–) = 1.33 V is 0.76 V, and the electron transfer from
0.8
0.6
0.4
I– to Cl2 – turns out to be energetically more favorable.
•
References
1. B. G. Ershov, Usp. Khim., 2004, 73, 107 [Russ. Chem. Rev.,
2004, 73 (Engl. Transl.)].
–
BrI•
2. P. Neta, R. E. Huie, A. B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data,
1988, 17, 1027.
0.2
3. B. G. Ershov, M. Kelm, A. V. Gordeev, E. Janata, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 1872.
4. G. G. Jayson, B. J. Parsons, A. J. Swallow, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1, 1973, 69, 1579.
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
10–3 [I–]/[Br–]
Fig. 7. Plots of the ratio of the concentrations of the radical
anions Br2 , BrI•–, and I2 – in solution vs I–/Br– value.
5. D. Zehahi, J. Rabany, J. Phys. Chem., 1972, 76, 312.
6. P. Wardman, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1989, 18, 1711.
7. B. G. Ershov, E. Janata, A. V. Gordeev, Izv. Akad. Nauk,
Ser. Khim., 2005, 1336 [Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2005,
54, 1378].
8. E. Janata, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1992, 40, 437.
9. E. Janata, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1994, 44, 449.
10. E. Janata, W. Gutsch, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1998, 51, 65.
11. G. L. Hug, Optical Spectra of Nonmetallic Inorganic Transient
Species in Aqueous Solution, NSRDSꢀNBS 69, Washington,
1981, 159.
12. G. V. Buxton, C. L. Greenstock, W. P. Helman, A. B. Ross,
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1988, 17, 513.
13. E. Janata, R. H. Schuler, J. Phys. Chem., 1982, 86, 2078.
14. B. G. Ershov, A. V. Gordeev, E. Janata, M. Kelm, Menꢀ
deleev Commun., 2001, 4, 149.
15. D. W. Margerum, P. N. Dickson, J. C. Nagy, K. Kumar,
C. P. Bowers, K. D. Fogelman, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25, 4900.
16. W. C. Troy, M. D. Kelley, J. C. Nagy, D. W. Margerum,
Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 4838.
17. T. X. Wang, M. D. Kelley, J. Cooper, R. C. Beckwith, D. W.
Margerum, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 5872.
18. H. A. Schwarz, B. H. J. Bielski, J. Phys. Chem., 1986,
90, 1445.
19. A. J. Elliot, Can. J. Chem., 1992, 70, 1658.
20. B. G. Ershov, E. Janata, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 372, 159.
21. M. Schoneshofer, A. Henglein, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem.,
1969, 73, 289.
–
•
•
BrI•– and I2 –. The equilibrium shifts to the predominant
•
formation of I2 – with an increase in the I– concentration.
•
These radical anions are highly reactive and shortꢀlived
species. The rate constants of their recombination are
~3.0•109 L mol–1 s–1 (see Table 1). Their decay results in
the formation of a large array of molecular (Br2, BrI, I2)
and ionic (Br3–, Br2I–, BrI2–, I3–) products, which exist at
equilibrium with each other. The mixed trihalide ions give
intense absorption bands in the UV region: for Br2I–
λmax = 253 nm, ε = 5.5•104 L mol–1 cm–1 and for BrI2
–
λ
max = 273 nm, ε = 6.1•104 L mol–1 cm–1 16
. These anions
are formed after the disappearance of the radical anions,
and their absorption bands are overlapped with those of
Br3 (λmax = 266 nm, ε = 4.1•104 L mol–1 cm–1) and I–
–
(λmax = 225 nm, ε = 1.1•104 L mol–1 cm–1).16,17 This fact
substantially impedes the rigid kinetic analysis of the proꢀ
cess of their formation. However, this problem was not
stated in our investigation, because the properties of these
spacies were studied in detail elsewhere15—17. They were
produced in the reactions of molecular halogens with haꢀ
lide ions. Nevertheless, at the concentration of the I– ion
about 5•10–6 mol L–1 in a 0.1 М solution of NaBr, when
the formation of the Br3 and Br2I– species prevailed
–
22. M. Schoneshofer, Int. J. Radiat. Chem., 1969, 1, 505.
23. S. Navaratnam, B. Parsons, A. J. Swallow Radiat. Phys.
Chem., 1980, 15, 159.
24. P. Pagsberg, G. Fenger, S. O. Nielsen, J. Phys. Chem., 1969,
73, 1029.
(see Fig. 1), we calculated the rate constant for reaction (1)
equal to 2•1010 L mol–1 s–1
.
Thus, the radical anions Br2 oxidize the I– ions to
–
•
form the intermediate mixed radical anion BrI•–. The reꢀ
25. E. Peled, D. Meisel, G. Czapski, J. Phys. Chem., 1972,
76, 3677.
action between Cl2 – and the Br– ion proceeds similarly to
•
form ClBr•–. At the same time, Cl2 – interacts with the I–
•
ion to form the I• atoms, which are further transformed
into the radical anions I2 –.7 The potential differences of
•
–
•
–
0
–
the pairs E0(Br2 /2Br ) = 1.66 V and E (I•/I ) = 1.33 V,
Received September 10, 2005;
in revised form January 16, 2008
as well as E0(Cl2 /2Cl ) = 2.09 V and E (Br•/Br ) =
–
–
0
–
•