C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Pt substrate
otherwise be difficult to prove with conventional electrochemistry
on a single electrode.
•
Br2
8 2Br
(3)
(ads)
Acknowledgment. Q.W. is on leave from Chemistry Depart-
ment, School of Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing,
China, and thanks the National Scholarship Fund of the China
Scholarship Council for support and research advisor Dr. Huibo
Shao from the Beijing Institute of Technology. Helpful discussions
with Fu-Ren F. Fan and Cheng-Lan Lin are also gratefully
acknowledged. J.R.-L. thanks the William S. Livingston Endowment
Fund for a research fellowship and the complementary scholarship
support provided by Secretar ´ı a de Educaci o´ n P u´ blica of M e´ xico
and the Mexican Government. We acknowledge support from the
Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0021) and the National Science
Foundation (CHE-0808927).
Pt substrate
2
Br •( + CO(ads)
8 OCBr2
(4)
(5)
ads)
-
+
OCBr + H O f 2Br + CO + 2H
2
2
2
In fact, the product of reaction 4, OCBr
analogue of phosgene), has been reported (but also debated) to
be the product of a photosensitized low-yield reaction of Br and
2
or “bromophosgene” (an
2
0
2
CO in the gas phase in the absence of catalyst, where the radical-
forming reaction 3 proceeds through photochemical excitation. In
our experiment, the Pt substrate provides a catalytic surface where
reaction 3 happens more readily. The hydrolysis process in reaction
is thermodynamically allowed and provides the Br necessary
for the transient positive feedback as well as a source of oxygen
2
1
-
Supporting Information Available: Additional experimental details,
surface interrogation scan, and figures. This material is available free
of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
5
for the production of CO
dissolved in solution, Br
2
. If CO is not supported on Pt and only
is unable to oxidize it, as shown by CV
References
2
on a macroelectrode (Figure S2,Supporting Information).
(1) Rodr ´ı guez-L o´ pez, J.; Alpuche-Aviles, M. A.; Bard, A. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 16985–16995.
A second SI experiment involved the co-adsorption of CO and
(2) Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy; Bard, A. J., Mirkin, M. V., Eds.;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
-
22
cyanide (CN ) on the Pt UME surface. A cyanide-covered Pt
UME was used to limit the amount of CO(ads) at Pt in order to verify
(
3) For applications of SECM in catalysis see: Pust, S. E.; Maier, W.; Wittstock,
G. Z. Phys. Chem. 2008, 222, 1463–1517.
(
4) Vielstich, W. CO, Formic Acid, and Methanol Oxidation in Acid
Electrolytes - Mechanisms and Electrocatalysis. In Encyclopedia of
Electrochemistry; Bard, A. J., Stratmann, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2003; Vol. 2, pp 466-511. Iwasita, T. In Handbook of Fuel
Cells; Vielstich, W., Lamm, A., Gasteiger, H. A., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester,
UK, 2003; Vol. 2, pp 603-624.
its reaction with Br
tion). The SI-SECM results show that, with CN , the adsorption
2
, as shown in Figure S3 (Supporting Informa-
-
of CO is blocked and furthermore that, despite the isoelectronic
-
nature of CN and CO, their reactivity toward Br
2
is different. This
is an important step in the
reaction scheme or that CN- blocks sites for the dissociation of
Br
suggests that the formation of OCBr
2
(5) Siwek, H.; Lukaszewski, M.; Czerwinski, A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2008, 10, 3752–3765.
(
6) Inkaew, P.; Korzeniewski, C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 3655–
3661.
7) Offer, G. J.; Kucernak, A. R. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2008, 613, 171–185.
2
.
(
Finally, a bulk experiment was carried out to identify CO
the end product of the reaction. A beaker with 10 mmol of Br
00 mL of 0.5 M H SO
2
as
in
(8) Czerwinski, A.; Sobkowski, J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1978, 91, 47–53.
(
9) Lopez-Cudero, A.; Cuesta, A.; Glaudio, G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006,
86, 184–195.
10) Batista, E. A.; Iwasita, T.; Vielstich, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 14216–
4222.
11) Samjeske, G.; Komatsu, K.-I.; Osawa, M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113,
0222–10228.
2
5
1
2
4
was bubbled with CO through an inlet
(
(
1
where Ar was also continuously passed; Pt black was added as a
catalyst. The outlet of the beaker was connected to a container with
1
1
00 mL of a saturated and Ar-purged solution of Ba(OH)
transparent). A control experiment, in which no Pt black was added,
showed only cloudiness in the Ba(OH) solution after 5 min of
CO bubbling. This is attributed to small impurities of CO in the
CO feed. When Pt black was added to the reaction mixture, an
abundant precipitate of BaCO was observed in the Ba(OH)
solution. The precipitate was identified as the carbonate through
the “carbonate-acid test”. The addition of AgClO solution to the
2
(12) Lu, G.-Q.; Crown, A.; Wieckowski, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9700–
9
711. Lu, G.-Q.; Chrzanowski, W.; Wieckowski, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000,
(
1
04, 5566–5572. Chen, Y.-X.; Shen, Y.; Heinen, M.; Jusys, Z.; Osawa,
M.; Behm, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9534–9544. Lai, S. C. S.;
Kleyn, S. E. F.; Rosca, V.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112,
2
2
1
9080–19087. Cao, D.; Lu, G.-Q.; Wiekcowski, A.; Wasileski, S. A.;
Neurock, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11622–11633.
(
13) Rice, C.; Ha, S.; Masel, R. I.; Wieckowski, A. J. Power Sources 2003,
3
2
1
15, 229–235.
(14) Koper, M. T. M.; Jansen, A. P. J.; van Santen, R. A.; Lukkien, J. J.; Hilbers,
P. A. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 6051–6062.
4
(
15) Macpherson, J. V.; Slevin, C. J.; Unwin, P. R. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
residue of the reaction mixture showed the precipitation of whitish-
yellow AgBr, which also supports Br- as an end product. This
Trans. 1996, 92, 3799–3805.
(16) Sheffer, M.; Mandler, D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, D203–D208.
17) Nakanishi, S.; Sakai, S.-I.; Hatou, M.; Fukami, K.; Nakato, Y. J.
(
2 2
experiment confirms that CO can be oxidized to CO by Br through
Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, E47-E51.
2
3
(18) Bard, A. J.; Denuault, G.; Lee, C.; Mandler, D.; Wipf, D. O. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1990, 23, 357–363.
(19) Woods, R. Chemisorption at Electrodes. In Electroanalytical Chemistry;
Bard, A. J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1976; pp 1-162.
the catalytic action of Pt.
In conclusion, the SI-SECM technique allowed the production
of Br
2
on an interrogator tip, which reported transient positive
(
20) Lissi, E.; Simonaitis, R.; Heicklen, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 1416–1419.
Piva, A. Gazz. Chim.Ital. 1915, 45 (1), 219–237. Lenher, S.; Schumacher,
H.-J. Z. Phys. Chem. 1928, 135, 85–101. Schumacher, H.-J.; Lenher, S.
Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. B: Abhandlungen 1928, 61, 1671–1675.
Livingston, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1930, 34, 2121–2122.
-
feedback (due to Br regeneration) as an indication of the reactivity
of this halogen with CO(ads) on a Pt substrate. CO(ads) under saturation
conditions was reproducibly quantified at the polycrystalline Pt
surface with θCO ≈ 0.5 The reaction is shown to be blocked by the
action of pre-adsorbed cyanide, which demonstrates the surface
(
(
21) Francisco, J. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 363, 275–282.
22) Huerta, F.; Morallon, E.; Vazquez, J. L. Electrochem. Commun. 2002, 4,
251–254.
(
23) Caution! Because of the possibility of forming bromophosgene (eq 4), these
2
character of the process. The formation of CO as an end product
experiments were performed in a hood at all times, and extensive Ar purging
was further tested in a bulk experiment. The use of SI-SECM
provided access to the study of a reaction that has not been
previously reported to be catalyzed by Pt, a finding that would
of the reaction products was done after the conclusion. OCBr
2
is unstable
2
in basic solution, so the Ba(OH) traps it in addition to the CO .
2
JA907626T
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 131, NO. 47, 2009 17047