2
44
R. Settambolo et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 619 (2001) 241–244
tions the aldol condensation is promoted by a rhodium
carbonyl, although at a very low rate. It is to remark that,
the 3-formyl-5,6-dihydroindolizine, arising from an in-
tramolecular attack of C5 pyrrole carbon atom on the
carbonyl group of the alkyl chain of the dialdehyde 2,
previously observed in the case of simple 1-allylpyrrole
hydroformylation [2], does not form, the above described
aldol condensation being the exclusive process. Because
of the presence of electron-withdrawing group on the
pyrrole C2 carbon atom, the C5 carbon atom is not
nucleophilic enough to bear the electrophilic attack of the
carbonyl moiety.
Aldol condensations of oxo aldehydes under hydro-
formylation conditions have been often observed [6–8].
Recently several efforts have been reported in literature
to combine hydroformylation with a consecutive aldol
reaction in a one pot sequence [9–12]. As far as we know,
the process here described constitutes the first example
of tandem hydroformylation–aldol condensation se-
quence devoted to the synthesis of indolizine moiety.
Hydro derivatives of indolizine are an interesting and
topical subject because some of these occur in natural
products [13]. The rhodium-catalysed hydroformylation
of appropriate 1-allyl-2-formylpyrroles could be a conve-
nientprotocolforthesynthesisofthisclassofcompounds.
and evaporated in vacuo to give 3.4 g (25.3 mmol, 80%
yield) of 1 as a orange oil. H-NMR: l 9.55 (s, 1H), 6.96
1
(m, 2H), 6.26 (t, 1H), 5.98 (m, 1H), 5.17 (d, 1H), 5.04–4.95
13
(m, 3H). C-NMR: 179.5, 134.0, 131.0, 124.3, 116.9,
110.0, 51.0.
2.2. Hydroformylation of 1-allyl-2-formylpyrrole (1)
2.2.1. General procedure
A solution of 1-allyl-2-formylpyrrole (1) (0.5 g, 3.7
mmol) and Rh (CO) (7 mg) in toluene (11 ml) was
4
12
introduced by suction into an evacuated 25 ml stainless
steel reaction vessel. Carbon monoxide was introduced,
the autoclave was then rocked, heated to 100°C and
hydrogen was rapidly introduced to 100 atm (CO:H =
2
1:1) total pressure. When the gas absorption reached the
value corresponding to the fixed conversion, the reaction
mixture was siphoned out; the degree of conversion and
the products distributions were determined by GC/GC–
MS control, by using acetophenone as internal standard.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministero dell’
Universit a` e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica
(
Murst, Roma), Programmi di Ricerca di Interesse
Nazionale (2000–2002).
2. Experimental
References
All reagents were of commercial quality. Silica gel and
aluminium oxide (70–230 mesh) were purchased from
Merck. Toluene was dried over molecular sieves and
[1] P. Eilbracht, L. B a¨ rfacker, C. Buss, C. Hollmann, B.E. Kitsos-Rzy-
chon, C.L. Kranemann, T. Rische, R. Roggenbuck, A. Schmidt,
Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 3329.
distilled under nitrogen. NMR spectra were recorded in
[
[
[
[
[
2] R. Lazzaroni, R. Settambolo, A. Caiazzo, L. Pontorno, J.
1
CDCl on a Varian Gemini 200 at 200 MHz for H and
5
3
Organomet. Chem. 601 (2000) 320.
1
3
0 MHz for C. Chemical shifts (l) were referred to TMS.
+
3] 2: MS m/e 147 (M −18, 46), 136 (27), 118 (100), 108 (36), 91
GC analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer 8700
chromatograph equipped with a 12 m×0.22 mm BP5
capillary column, using nitrogen as carrier gas. GC–MS
analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer Q-Mass 910
interfaced with a Perkin Elmer 8500 chromatograph
equipped with a 30 m×0.25 mm apolar BP1 capillary
column, using helium as carrier gas. IR spectra were
recorded on a Perkin–Elmer FT–IR spectrophotometer
(22). IR neat 1721.1 (wcꢀo), 1660.2 (wcꢀo).
+
4] 3: MS m/e 137 (M −28, 40), 118 (43), 108 (31), 104 (38), 94 (100),
8
0 (40). IR neat 1723.9 (wcꢀo), 1659.6 (wcꢀo).
+
5] 2%: MS m/e 147 (M , 66), 146 (61), 118 (100), 117 (58), 91 (19).
−1
IR neat 1606.4 cm
(w cꢀc), 1646.7 (wcꢀo).
6] (a)B.Cornils,W.A.Herrmann,C.W.Kohlpaintner,Angew.Chem.
106 (1994) 2219. (b) B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann, Applied Homo-
geneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, VCH, Wein-
heim, 1996.
[
7] P. Kalck, Y. Peres, J. Jenck, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 32 (1991)
1
760X. Rh (CO) was prepared according to a well-
4 12
1
21.
known procedure [14,15].
[
[
8] R.L. Pruett, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 17 (1979) 1.
9] B. Fell, P. Hermanns, H. Bahrmann, J. Prakt. Chem. 340 (1998)
4
59.
10] A.J. Chalk, in: P.N. Rylander, H. Greenfield, R.L. Augustine
Eds.), Catalysis of Organic Reactions, Marcel Dekker, New York,
988, p. 43.
11] W. Hoffmann, H. Siegel, Tetrahedron Letters 8 (1975) 533.
2
.1. Preparation of 1-allyl-2-formylpyrrole (1)
[
[
(
1
To a stirred mixture of 50% aqueous NaOH (20 ml)
solution, 2-formylpyrrole (3.0 g, 31.6 mmol) and tetra-
butylammonium hydrogen sulfate (1.2 g, 3.5 mmol) in
toluene (50 ml), was added 3-chloro-1-propene (2.7 ml,
[12] (a) C. Hollmann, P. Eilbracht, Tetrahedron Letters 40 (1999) 4313.
b) C. Hollmann, P. Eilbracht, Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2000) 1685.
(
[
13] (a) A.R. Katritzky, C.N. Fali, J. Li, J. Org. Chem. 62 (1997) 4148,
and references cited therein. (b) B. Sayah, N. Pelloux-L e´ on, Y.
Vall e´ e, J. Org. Chem. 65 (2000) 2824.
2.5 g, 32.7 mmol). The mixture was then heated at 70°C,
with vigorous stirring, for 1 h. The cooled mixture was
dilutedwithwaterandextractedwithether. Thecombined
[
14] J.A. McCleverty, G. Wilkinson, Inorg. Synth. 8 (1966) 211.
organic extracts were washed with water, dried (Na
.
SO4),
[15] P.E. Cattermole, G.A. Osborne, Inorg. Synth. 17 (1977) 115.
2