120
S.M. Ball et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 342 (2001) 113±120
case NO
vidually quanti®ed. Measurements of NO
ambient air report [14] values in the range 5±20
pptv, although considerably higher amounts, ꢂ100
pptv, have been observed in urban environments
3
and NO
2
, have been separated and indi-
in clean
porting this work in the formof a NERC Ad-
vanced Research Fellowship +SMB) and a `Small
Research Grant' GR9/04411.
3
[
15,16]. The sensitivity of the current instrument is
therefore already sucient to detect atmospheric
NO provided that ringdown times in atmospheric
References
[1] G. Berden, R. Peeters, G. Meijer, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19
+
3
2000) 565.
samples are similar to those in laboratory samples.
However, scattering by atmospheric aerosol is
likely to reduce signi®cantly the eective path length
accessible with a CRDS ®eld instrument. Prelimi-
nary measurements on samples of urban air indicate
that ringdown times of the present 95 cm cavity are a
factor of 3 to 4 smaller than those of the ¯ushed
cavity between 650 and 670 nm. Nevertheless,
ringdown times of 35 ls +equivalent to a 10.5 km
path) have been demonstrated around 660 nm in
samples of urban air contained in a 140 cm cavity
employing the same mirrors as used above. Indeed it
may be possible to determine ringdown times more
accurately than above by employing a dedicated
CCD clocking procedure to acquire the complete
ringdown decay: the present instrument collects
data for only the ®rst 50 ls of the decay which is
approximately one ringdown period at 650 nm and
just over half a ringdown period at 670 nm. The
authors estimate that a ®eld instrument with a 50 mJ
broadband laser source, a 1.5 mcavity and a defect-
[
[
2] P. Zalicki, R.N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 102 +1995) 2708.
3] S.M. Newman, I.C. Lane, A.J. Orr-Ewing, D.A. Newn-
ham, J. Ballard, J. Chem. Phys. 110 +1999) 10 749.
4] R.D. van Zee, J.T. Hodges, J.P. Looney, Appl. Optics 38
+1999) 3951.
[
[
5] T.G. Spence, C.C. Harb, B.A. Paldus, R.N. Zare, B.
Willke, R.L. Byer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71 +2000) 347.
6] U. Platt, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1 +1999) 5409.
7] M.D. King, E.M. Dick, W.R. Simpson, Atmos. Environ.
[
[
3
4 +2000) 685.
[8] R. Engeln, G. Meijer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67 +1996)
708.
2
[
9] E.R. Crosson, P. Haar, G.A. Marcus, H.A. Schwettman,
B.A. Paldus, T.G. Spence, R.N. Zare, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70
+
10] J.J. Scherer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 292 +1998) 143.
1999) 4.
[
[11] W.J. Marinelli, D.M. Swanson, H.S. Johnston, J. Chem.
Phys. 76 +1982) 2864.
[
12] W.B. DeMore, S.P. Sander, D.M. Golden, R.F. Hampson,
M.J. Kurylo, C.J. Howard, A.R. Ravishankara, C.E.
Kolb, M.J. Molina, Chemical kinetics and photochemical
data for use in stratospheric modeling, Evaluation Number
12, JPL publication 97-4, Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Pasadena, 1997.
[
13] R.P. Wayne, I. Barnes, P. Biggs, J.P. Burrows, C.E.
Canosa-Mas, J. Hjorth, G. Le Bras, G.K. Moortgat, D.
Perner, G. Poulet, G. Restelli, H. Sidebottom, Atmos.
Environ. 25A +1991) 203.
free CCD would sample atmospheric NO with the
3
same 2 pptv sensitivity demonstrated above but in a
reduced acquisition time of 2.5 min. The reduced
acquisition time is made possible principally be-
cause the use of a more intense light source would
allow more photons to be collected per CCD pixel
per unit time, especially near 670 nm where the
output of the present source is weak.
[14] B.J. Allan, N. Carslaw, H. Coe, R.A. Burgess, J.M.C.
Plane, J. Atmos. Chem. 33 +1999) 129.
[
15] S.R. Aliwell, R.L. Jones, J. Geophys. Res. 103 +1998)
719.
5
[
16] I.M. Povey, A.M. South, A. t'Kint de Roodenbeke, C.
Hill, R.A. Freshwater, R.L. Jones, J. Geophys. Res. 103
+
1998) 3369.
[
17] G. Meijer, M.G.H. Boogaarts, R.T. Jongma, D.H. Parker,
A.M. Wodtke, Chem. Phys. Lett. 217 +1994) 112.
18] M. Nicolet, Planet. Space Sci. 32 +1984) 1467.
19] A.C. Vandaele, C. Hermans, P.C. Simon, M. van Rooz-
endael, J.M. Guilmot, M. Carleer, R. Colin, J. Atmos.
Chem. 25 +1996) 289.
Acknowledgements
[
[
The authors would like to acknowledge the
Natural Environment Research Council for sup-