5290
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 111, No. 12, 22 September 1999
V. K. Nestorov and J. I. Cline
1
Our interest here is in how the velocity projections de-
pend on the probe helicity when probing P- or R-branch
More quantitatively, angular momentum alignment is related to the quad-
rupole moment of the j distribution about a quantization axis. Angular
momentum orientation is related to the dipole moment. In a quantum
mechanical description the terms refer to the properties of the mj distri-
bution; see Refs. 36 and 37.
transitions at ϭ/4 or 3/4, the two polarization geom-
D
2
0
etries most sensitive to the  (21) bipolar moment. In these
instances a projection has either a convex or concave peak,
depending on the probe helicity. This results from selective
detection of the clockwise ͑or counterclockwise͒ rotating NO
products concentrated at the center ͑or periphery͒ of the pro-
jection at these two geometries. Any helicity dependence is
2
3
4
5
G. O. Sitz, A. C. Kummel, R. N. Zare, and J. C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 89,
2572 ͑1988͒.
E. Hasselbrink, J. R. Waldeck, and R. N. Zare, Chem. Phys. 126, 191
͑
1988͒.
J. F. Black, E. Hasselbrink, J. R. Waldeck, and R. N. Zare, Mol. Phys. 71,
143 ͑1990͒.
1
exactly opposite for the ϭ/4 and 3/4 geometries, since
M. L. Costen, S. W. North, and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. ͑to be pub-
lished͒.
J. A. Beswick and O. Roncero, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 7514 ͑1992͒.
M. Mons and I. Dimicoli, Chem. Phys. 130, 307 ͑1989͒.
M. Mons and I. Dimicoli, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4037 ͑1989͒.
V. P. Hradil, T. Suzuki, S. A. Hewitt, and P. L. Houston, J. Chem. Phys.
D
this change in geometry exchanges the locations of the
clockwise and counterclockwise NO rotors in the velocity
projection. As expected, the probe helicity dependence is
also opposite for the P11 and R21 branch transitions, and
negligible for the Q ϩR branch transition.27 At the D
6
7
8
9
99, 4455 ͑1993͒.
2
2
12
1
1
0
1
A. Sanov, C. R. Bieler, and H. Reisler, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 13637 ͑1995͒.
S. A. Reid and H. Reisler, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 474 ͑1996͒.
Y. Mo, H. Katayanagi, and T. Suzuki, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 2029 ͑1999͒.
Conservation of energy restricts the vϭ0 NO X product to rotational lev-
els jр41.5; see Ref. 9.
R. Uberna, R. D. Hinchliffe, and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7934
͑1995͒.
R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1866 ͑1986͒.
ϭ0 and /2 polarization geometries no probe helicity depen-
dence is observed. A preliminary analysis of the images ob-
tained probing the P ͑36.5͒ and R (21.5) transitions in Fig.
12
13
1
1
21
2
3
gives  (21)ϭ0.2, measured by direct fit to imaging
theory for polarized 1ϩ1Ј REMPI probing.
value of  (21) indicates that the N end of the NO product
0
2
9–31
14
The positive
2
0
15
16
receives the recoil impulse.
Though this result is in accord with the expectations for
a simple, classical impulsive photodissociation mechanism
R. J. Gordon and G. E. Hall, Adv. Chem. Phys. 94, 1 ͑1996͒.
L. D. Barron, Chem. Phys. Lett. 123, 423 ͑1986͒.
A. J. R. Heck and D. W. Chandler, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 335
1
1
7
8
͑
1995͒.
for NO , the actual mechanism is likely much more
2
19
20
P. L. Houston, Acc. Chem. Res. 28, 453 ͑1995͒.
P. Samartzis, I. Sakellariou, T. Gougousi, and T. N. Kitsopoulos, J. Chem.
Phys. 107, 43 ͑1997͒.
D. H. Parker and A. T. J. B. Eppink, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 2357 ͑1997͒.
M. Kawasaki et al., J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19853 ͑1996͒.
A. T. J. B. Eppink and D. H. Parker, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3477 ͑1997͒.
R. Uberna, R. D. Hinchliffe, and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9847
1
1
complex. The observed sense of rotation is consistent with
NO rotation evolving from a decreasing NO bond angle at
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
the instant of bond rupture. Opposite senses of rotation might
instead be expected for an alternative fragmentation mecha-
nism in which the NO bond angle increases as a N–O bond
24
2
ruptures, in which case the O end of NO would effectively
receive the recoil impulse.
There is an important relationship between the oriented
rotational motion of NO from linearly polarized photodisso-
͑
1996͒.
2
2
5
6
J. S. Spasov and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9568 ͑1999͒.
We quantify the probe helicity using the helicity parameter, , defined by
Blum in Ref. 28. The helicity parameters ϭϪ/4 and ϭϩ/4 corre-
spond to right and left circularly-polarized probe light, respectively, as
defined in Ref. 38.
ciation of NO and the oriented electronic angular momen-
2
2
27
tum of the Cl P atom from the linearly polarized photo-
The spectroscopic branch dependence of circularly polarized probing of
3
/2
3
2,33
(1)
rotational orientation can be understood by examining the h (j) geo-
dissociation of ICl, recently reported by Rakitzis et al.
The experimental manifestation of the orientation in the two
systems is similar,
metrical factor that appears in the relevant absorption intensity expression
in Eq. ͑1͒ of Ref. 14. In the high-j limit, h( ϭ1 for P branches, 0 for Q
branches, and Ϫ1 for R branches; see Table I of Ref. 36.
K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications ͑Plenum, New York,
1981͒.
1)
6
,34
but has very different mechanistic ori-
gins. In the ICl experiments, the Cl atom electronic orienta-
tion arises from quantum mechanical coherence between dis-
sociation channels involving parallel and perpendicular
28
29
V. K. Nestorov, R. Hinchliffe, K. T. Lorenz, R. Uberna, D. W. Chandler,
and J. I. Cline, in preparation.
V. K. Nestorov and J. I. Cline ͑in preparation͒.
Our image fitting and analysis programs are available at http://
www.chem.unr.edu/faculty/cline/fimage.
T. P. Rakitzis, S. A. Kandel, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 8291
excited states. In the NO experiment the origin of rotational
2
30
31
orientation is evident in an intuitive classical picture of the
photodissociation recoil trajectory.
We conclude by noting that measurements of this type of
rotational orientation can provide detailed mechanistic infor-
mation for other systems exhibiting prompt photodissocia-
tion or for bimolecular scattering.35
32
͑
1998͒.
33
T. P. Rakitzis et al., J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3351 ͑1999͒.
34
2
The  (21) bipolar moment of Ref. 14 is identical ͑within a scaling fac-
0
(1)
tor͒ to the Im͓a1
( ,Ќ)͔ term defined by T. P. Rakitzis and R. N. Zare, J.
ʈ
We thank Dr. K. Thomas Lorenz and Dr. David W.
Chandler for numerous contributions and advice in the con-
struction and operation of the ion imaging apparatus at Ne-
vada, and Dr. Gregory E. Hall for helpful discussions. We
thank the National Science Foundation for support of this
research.
Chem. Phys. 110, 3341 ͑1999͒; G. E. Hall ͑private communication͒.
G. M. McClelland and D. R. Herschbach, J. Phys. Chem. 981, 5509
3
3
5
6
͑
1987͒.
C. H. Greene and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 119 ͑1982͒.
R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum ͑Wiley, New York, 1988͒.
W. A. Shurcliff and S. S. Ballard, Polarized Light ͑Van Nostrand,
Princeton, NJ, 1964͒.
37
38
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
31.91.169.193 On: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 00:29:50
1