4866 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 104, No. 20, 2000
Sato et al.
propose a mechanism involving enhancement in the direct
absorption of adsorbed N2O3 by electron transfer from the
13
surface. Shaw and Vosper observed that the visible absorption
of N2O3 in organic solvents increases with a decrease in the
ionization potential of the solvent. For instance, the absorption
-
1
2
maximum of N2O3 was 97 mol dm at 730 nm in carbon
-
1
2
tetrachloride, while it was 275 mol dm at 690 nm in
m-dimethoxybenzene. Their results indicate that electron dona-
tion from the solvent to N2O3 enhances the absorption of N2O3.
Although the absorption maximum in the UV region could not
be measured due to strong absorption of the solvents, it is sure
that the UV absorption also increases with an increase in the
donor ability of the solvent, judging from the significant increase
13
in the tail of the π f π* transition in the visible region. For
NO2/Au and N2O3/Au, Bartram and Koel observed a large
8
increase in work function (1.6 eV) upon NO2 adsorption on the
Au(111) surface and the lowering of the work function (-0.8
eV) upon formation of adsorbed N2O3. The increase in work
function indicates electron transfer from the Au surface to
chemisorbed NO2, and the decrease in work function after N2O3
formation would arise from electron transfer from NO2 to NO
in adsorbed N2O3, which can reduce the shielding effect of NO2.
The strong NO stretching of adsorbed N2O3 may indicate this
electron transfer toward NO. It is therefore reasonably assumed
that electron transfer from the Au surface to adsorbed N2O3
greatly enhances its absorption in the UV region as well as in
the visible region. Thus, the wavelength dependence of the
photodissociation of N O adsorbed on the Au(111) surface is
Figure 6. Wavelength dependence of initial NO yield in the photolysis
of adsorbed N at 93 K and the reflectivity of an evaporated Au
film. The inset is the absorption spectra of N in the gas phase (a),
2
O
3
1
6
2
O
3
1
3
an aqueous solution (b), and an n-hexane solution (c).
of the incident angle of light. Hasselbrink et al.14 applied this
method to the photodissociation of N2O4 adsorbed on a NO-
saturated Pd(111) surface at 193 and 248 nm and concluded
that the photoabsorption by the metal is the dominant primary
step in the photodissociation. Because photoelectron emission
from a Pd surface does not occur at >220 nm due to its work
function (5.6 eV), they attributed the photodissociation to
electron transfer from the surface to the adsorbate. We have
found a large cross section in the photodissociation of N2O4
3
2
3
similar in shape to the absorption spectrum of N O in the gas
2
3
phase or in a solvent, as observed in the present study.
References and Notes
(1) Chuang, T. J.; Seki, H.; Hussla, I. Surf. Sci. 1985, 158, 525.
(2) King, D. S.; Cavanagh, R. R. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1989, 76, 45.
(3) Zhou, X.-L.; Zhu, X.-Y.; White, J. M. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1991, 13, 73.
(4) Gadzuk, J. W.; Richter, L. J.; Buntin, S. A.; Kingand, D. S.;
7
adsorbed on a NO2-covered Au(111) surface. The yield of the
Cavanagh, R. R. Surf. Sci. 1990, 235, 317.
(
5) Antoniewicz, P. R. Phys. ReV. B 1980, 21, 3811.
N2O4 photodissociation was significantly reduced when the
surface was covered with a thin water-ice film so that we
concluded enhanced photolysis due to electron transfer from
(6) Miesewich, J. A.; Heinz, T. F.; Newns, D. M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1992,
6
8, 3737.
(7) Sato, S.; Senga, T.; Kawasaki, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103,
5063.
7
the surface to adsorbed N2O4. Since photoinduced electron
(
(
8) Bartram, M. E.; Koel, B. E. Surf. Sci. 1989, 213, 137.
9) Wang, J.; Koel, B. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 8573.
transfer from a metal surface to adsorbates has been reported
for NO adsorbed on Cu(111) using the two-photon photoemis-
sion spectroscopy,15 similar photoinduced electron transfer may
be responsible for the enhanced photodissociation of N2O4 over
the Au surface.
(10) Gordon, A. J.; Ford, R. A. The Chemist’s Companion A Handbook
of Practical Data, Techniques, and References: John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1972; p 362.
(
2.
11) Greenler, R. G.; Rahn, R. R.; Schwartz, J. P. J. Catal. 1971, 23,
4
The absorption spectra of Pd and Au, however, cannot explain
the wavelength dependence of the N2O4 photodissociation yields,
as discussed in our previous paper. The same is true for the
(12) Suetaka, W. Surface Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy; Prenum
Press: New York and London, 1995; p 13.
(13) Shaw, A. W.; Vosper, A. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1972,
7
9
61.
(14) Hasselbrink, E.; Jakubith, S.; Nettesheim, S.; Wolf, M.; Cassuto,
A.; Ertle, G. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 3154.
15) Kinoshita, I.; Misu, A.; Munakata, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 102,
970.
16) Chronological Scientific Tables; National Astronomical Observa-
tory: Maruzen, Tokyo, 1997; p 521.
present N2O3/Au(111) system. As shown in Figure 6, the
16
reflectivity of an evaporated Au film varies to a small extent
in the wavelength range observed, while the N2O3 photodisso-
ciation yield changes drastically. Therefore, a simple mechanism
(
2
(
7
involving electron attachment would be ruled out, and we