H. Yokoyama, K. Yamaguchi, M. Sugimoto, S. Suzuki
FULL PAPER
probe (0.2-cm path-length) immersed in a small vessel containing
Experimental Section
a 5 mL CH
2 2
Cl solution of 4 (3.4 mg, 2.5 μmol) under an Ar atmo-
General Remarks: All reagents used were of the highest grade avail-
sphere. The reaction was started with the addition of 100 μL of a
able. Solvents were dried and distilled under N
2
. Bis(6-methyl-2-
]PF , and [(Ph P)
were synthesized according to the published procedures.
CH
2
Cl
2
solution containing CF
beforehand.
3
COOH (10 μmol), which had been
bpa),[ [Cu(CH
21]
CN)
pyridylmethyl)amine (Me
2
3
4
6
3
2
-
degassed with N
2
[
22]
N]NO
2
II
X-ray Crystallographic Study of [Cu (Me
(
2
bpa)(H
2
O)(ClO
4
)]ClO
4
All air-sensitive reactions were performed by using standard
Schlenk and vacuum-line techniques. Electronic absorption spectra
were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2200 spectrophotometer. Low-
temperature absorption spectra were obtained with a Shimadzu
Multi-Spec 1500 spectrophotometer. X-band EPR spectra were re-
II
1) and [Cu (Me
carried out on a MAC Science MXC18 diffractometer with graph-
ite-monochromated Mo-K radiation (λ = 0.71069 Å). A blue (1)
2 2 4
bpa)(NO )(ClO )] (2): The X-ray experiment was
α
or green (2) crystal was mounted on a glass capillary. The reflection
intensities were monitored by three standard reflections at every
corded on
a JEOL JES-FE1X spectrometer at 77 K. Gas
150 measurements, and the decay of intensities was within 2%. The
chromatography was performed by using a Shimadzu GC14B ana-
lyzer with TCD detector (3-m molecular sieve 13X column,
unit-cell parameters used for the refinement were determined by
least-square calculations on the setting angles for 22 carefully cen-
tered reflections. An absorption correction was applied. Diffraction
data were corrected for both Lorentz and polarization effects. The
2
3.5 mLmin–1 flow rate, helium carrier gas, and at 50 °C). Cyclic
voltammetric analyses were carried out using a Bioanalytical Sys-
tems Model CV-50W voltammetric analyzer with a three-electrode
system consisting of a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a gold wire
counter electrode, and a glassy carbon working electrode under an
Ag atmosphere at 25 °C.
[23]
structure was solved by direct methods SIR92 using the CRYS-
TAN-GM program system[ and refined anisotropically for non-
hydrogen atoms by full-matrix least-squares calculations. Each re-
finement was continued until all shifts were smaller than one-third
of the standard deviations of the parameters involved. Atomic scat-
tering factors and anomalous dispersion terms were taken from the
literature.[ All hydrogen atoms were located at their calculated
positions. The fundamental crystal data and experimental parame-
24]
II
[
Cu (Me
2
bpa)(H
2
O)(ClO
4
)]ClO
4
(1): A solution of Cu(ClO
4
)
2
·
6H
2
O (3.71 g, 10 mmol) in methanol (5 mL) was added to a solu-
tion of Me bpa (2.27 g, 10 mmol) in methanol (50 mL). The result-
ant solution was stirred for 1 h and stored for a few days at room
temperature to give blue crystals of
CuN (507.8): calcd. C 33.11, H 3.78, N 8.28; found
25]
2
1
(4.39 g, 86.5%). ters for structure determination are given in Table 3.
C
14
H19Cl
2
3
O
9
I
[
2 2 2 3 2 6
Cu (Me bpa)(NO )] [(Ph P) NPF ] (4): The X-ray experiment was
C 33.11, H 3.68, N 8.30.
carried out at –70 °C on a Rigaku Mercury CCD area detector
II
[
Cu (Me
2
bpa)(NO
2
)(ClO
4
)] (2): A solution of NaNO
2
(0.069 g, coupled with a Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometer with graphite mo-
1
1
mmol) in H
2
O (10 mL) was added to a solution of 1 (0.51 g,
α
nochromated Mo-K radiation (λ = 0.71069 Å). The pale-yellow
mmol) in H O (25 mL). The resultant solution was stirred for 1 h
2
crystal was mounted on a glass capillary. The data were corrected
for Lorentz and polarization effects, but not for secondary extinc-
tion. An empirical absorption correction was applied. The structure
was solved by direct methods using the Crystal Structure crystallo-
graphic software package[ and refined anisotropically for non-
hydrogen atoms by full-matrix least-squares calculations. Each re-
finement was continued until all shifts were smaller than one-third
of the standard deviations of the parameters involved. Atomic scat-
at room temperature to give 2 as a green precipitate. The green
complex 2 was recrystallized from methanol/H O (0.362 g, 83.0%).
17ClCuN (436.3): calcd. C 38.54, H 3.93, N 12.84; found
2
C
14
H
4 6
O
26]
C 38.37, H 3.95, N 12.83.
I
[
0
Cu (Me
2
bpa)(CH
3
CN)]PF
6
(3): [Cu(CH
3
CN)
atmosphere, to a
bpa (0.114 g, 0.5 mmol) in methanol (5 mL). After
stirring at 60 °C for 10 min, the resultant solution was stored at
20 °C. The pale-yellow crystalline solid thus obtained was filtered
off, washed with dry diethyl ether, and dried under N (0.196 g,
2.2%). C16 20CuF P (476.9): calcd. C 40.29, H 4.24, N 11.75;
4
]PF
6
(0.167 g,
.5 mmol) was added as a solid, under an N
2
solution of Me
2
tering factors and anomalous dispersion terms were taken from the
[25]
literature.
All hydrogen atoms were located at their calculated
–
positions. The maximum and minimum peaks on the final differ-
2
–3
ence Fourier map corresponded to 0.73 and –0.52 eÅ , respec-
8
H
6 4
N
tively. The fundamental crystal data and experimental parameters
for structure determination are given in Table 3.
found C 40.09, H 4.23, N 11.89.
I
[
(
Cu (Me
2
bpa)(NO
2
)]
2
·[(Ph
3
P)
2
NPF
6
]
(4):
[Cu(CH
atmosphere,
bpa (0.114 g, 0.5 mmol) in acetone (3.5 mL).
(0.292 g, 0.5 mmol) was then added to the resultant
solution, under an N atmosphere. After stirring for 1 h 4 precipi-
tated as a yellow powder (0.301 g, 88.7%). For X-ray analysis, yel-
low crystals of 4 were obtained from CH Cl /acetone. C64
(1357.3): calcd. C 56.63, H 4.76, N 9.29; found C 56.64,
3 4 6
CN) ]PF
CCDC-251363 (for 1), -251364, (for 2) and -251365 (for 4) contain
the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data
can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
0.167 g, 0.5 mmol) was added as a solid, under an N
to a solution of Me
(Ph P) N]NO
2
2
[
3
2
2
2
Electronic-Structure Calculations: Electronic-structure calculations
I
II
of the Cu and Cu complexes containing Me
2
bpa and nitrite were
2
2
2
H64Cu -
[
27]
carried out with the DFT method in the Gaussian 98 program.
6 9 4 3
F N O P
For all molecules, the geometries were fully optimized without any
H 4.90, N 9.41.
constraints. The three-parameter Becke–Lee–Yang–Parr (B3LYP)
Measurement of NO Generated from 3: A solution of 4 (10 mg,
functional was adopted as the exchange-correlation functional.[28]
7
.5 μmol) in CH
with a rubber septum. A degassed solution of CF
in CH Cl (0.05 mL) was then introduced with a syringe at room
2
Cl
2
(0.45 mL) was prepared in a small vial capped
The core electrons of Cu were replaced with the effective core po-
tential (ECP) of Hay and Wadt.[29] The basis set for Cu was the
3
COOH (6 μL)
split-valence set (LANL2DZ[21]) for the ECP. The Huzinaga–Dun-
2
2
temperature. The solution changed immediately from yellow to
blue. Analysis of the head-space gas by a GC analyzer indicated
that NO had been generated (7.3± 0.2 μmol).
ning (9s5p)/[4s2p] and (4s)/[2s] basis sets were used for the first row
elements and hydrogen, respectively.[30]
Supporting Information (see also footnote on the first page of this
article): Further figures illustrating the ESR spectra of 1 and 2, the
GC chart, and the Arrhenius–Eyring plot for the reaction of 4 with
proton are provided.
2 2
Kinetics: The kinetic studies of nitrite reduction of 4 in CH Cl
were carried out by monitoring the intensity decrease of the 320-
nm band. The absorbance was detected by a fiber-optics quartz
1440
© 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 1435–1441