12358
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 121, No. 24, 22 December 2004
Dribinski et al.
exclude the possibility of participation of higher-order exci-
tations, the experimental angular distributions at each trans-
lational energy were fit with the extended equation,
velocity, and is a characteristic lifetime of the molecule
before dissociation. Using Eqs. ͑5͒ and ͑6͒ with the experi-
mental 2 and 4 values and a rotational temperature T
ϭ3–5 K for parent (NO)2 in the beam, we obtain dissocia-
tion lifetimes of Ϸ0.7 ps and Ϸ1.2 ps at 7.75 eV ͑320 nm͒,
and 7.19 eV ͑345 nm͒, respectively; i.e., the dissociation
lifetime decreases at higher excitation energies. These life-
times are longer than a vibrational period, implying a predis-
sociative mechanism rather than direct dissociation from a
repulsive excited state. Another indication of the predissocia-
tive nature of the excited state is the detection of a weak
dimer-ion signal (m/eϭ60) in excitation wavelengths in the
region 7.1–8.2 eV. In other words, even with a nanosecond
laser, ionization of the excited dimer state competes with
dissociation. A predissociation mechanism can also explain
the observed high internal ͑vibrational and rotational͒ exci-
tation of the dissociation products.
I ͒ϭC 1ϩ P cos ͒ϩ P cos ͒
͑
͓
͑
͑
2
2
4
4
ϩ6P6 cos ͒ ,
͑4͒
͑
͔
which contains also a sixth Legendre polynomial responsible
for three-photon processes. Figure 6 shows that at both
wavelengths, 2 and 4 have nonzero values at all product
translational energies, while 6Ϸ0 within the accuracy of
our experiments. It is also evident that at higher fragment
translational energies both 2 and 4 have large positive
values, producing a nearly cos4 angular distribution. This
indicates that a parallel transition with one dominating vir-
tual intermediate state is accessed ͑no real dimer states are
expected at the one-photon energy͒, and the transition dipole
moments for both absorption steps are aligned along the
N–N bond ͑i.e., B2 symmetry in C2v point group͒. Since the
ground state of the NO dimer has A1 symmetry, we conclude
that the state ͑or states͒ initially accessed at 7.1–8.2 eV must
also be of A1 symmetry.
D. The nature of the excited state
The experimental results described above allow us to
characterize the optically excited state. The large signals
from NO products in Rydberg states point to a correlation
between the product channels and parent dimer excited
state͑s͒ with significant Rydberg character. The bound nature
of the state is supported by the observation of a (NO)ϩ2 par-
ent ion signal in ionization via the neutral dimer’s excited
state. The (NO)ϩ2 ion is bound by ϳ5000 cmϪ1, and the 5.12
eV excited state is bound by at least 3500 cmϪ1. The obser-
vation of a dimer ion mass at m/eϭ60 confirms that the
excited state of the neutral dimer has a lifetime long enough
to allow ionization by a nanosecond laser beam. An absorp-
tion spectrum in this wavelength region is unavailable, but
the 2ϩ1 REMPI spectrum of the NO dimer at 300–345 nm
appears to have diffuse structures.
Both 2 and 4 decrease significantly in the region of
low product translational energies ͑below 500 cmϪ1͒. This
trend has been observed previously for the anisotropy param-
eter  in one-photon dissociation of several molecules, in-
cluding (NO)2 ,7,27,29 and successfully explained by a semi-
classical model based on angular momentum conservation,
which takes into account nonaxial recoil due to rotation of
the molecular frame during dissociation of low-temperature
species terminating in products with high rotational excita-
tion. Likewise, the observed decrease in anisotropy param-
eters in our experiments indicates the formation of highly
rotationally excited fragments.
The measured values of the anisotropy parameters at
higher product translational energies are 2ϭ2.5Ϯ0.1, 4
ϭ0.9Ϯ0.1 at 320 nm and 2ϭ2.15Ϯ0.05, 4ϭ0.75Ϯ0.05
at 345 nm. These values are close to the limiting values of
2ϭ2.86 and 4ϭ1.14 for a parallel transition with a paral-
lel intermediate step. The slight reduction in the anisotropy
parameters cannot be accounted for by the presence of a
perpendicular component, because in this case one of the
anisotropy parameters would have undergone a much larger
reduction than the other ͑as demonstrated above, in perpen-
dicular transitions 2 and 4 have opposite signs͒. The de-
viations from the maximum values of the anisotropy param-
eters at high product translational energies can be explained
by rotation of the parent dimer prior to dissociation. Follow-
ing the simple classical derivation of Jonah for one-photon
transition,30 we obtain for the case of two-photon dissocia-
tion,
Based on the A1 symmetry of the excited state of the
dimer and the energies of the dimer Rydberg states estimated
by using the Rydberg formula,31 four possible candidates
emerge: 3dx2, 3dx Ϫy2, 4s ͑estimated energies ϳ7.2 eV͒,
2
and 4pz ͑ϳ7.5 eV͒, where z is perpendicular to the N–N
bond in the plane of the molecule (C2 axis͒. The observed
NO Rydberg products are all in nϭ3 states, and therefore
correlate with nϭ3 Rydberg states of the dimer, providing
some preference for the 3d states. However, experiments and
calculations at lower energies show that a state with a spe-
cific Rydberg character in the dimer does not necessarily
evolve adiabatically to product NO monomer in the corre-
sponding Rydberg state.14 The electronic state reached at 5.6
eV has a mixed B2 valence/Rydberg (3px) character, but the
major product is NO in the 3s Rydberg state. In the present
experiments the simultaneous production of several elec-
tronically excited states of NO indicates that more than one
excited state of the NO dimer participates in the dissociation.
This underscores the importance of nonadiabatic interactions
between excited states in the region of study. Valence dimer
states leading to NO products in excited valence states ͓e.g.,
NO(B)] probably participate as well, and states with a mixed
valence/Rydberg nature are likely.
2ϩ1
2
e2ffϭ
e4ffϭ
2 ,
͑5͒
͑6͒
2
4 2ϩ1
2
2
2ϩ1͒ 9 2ϩ1͒
͑
͑
4 ,
2
2
4 2ϩ1͒ 16 2ϩ1͒
͑
͑
where i (iϭ2,4) is the anisotropy parameter for the nonro-
tating parent molecule, is its classical rotational angular
128.252.67.66 On: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:18:50