Photochemistry of Roussin’s Red Salt Esters
photolyzed did not lead to significant 510 nm absorbance changes
over the time frame of the analytical procedure.
ester, Fe2(µ-SCH3)2(NO)4 (1), the diethyl ester, Fe2(µ-SCH2-
CH3)2(NO)4 (2), the dibenzyl ester Fe2(µ-CH2C6H5)2(NO)4
(3), the 2-hydroxyethyl ester, Fe2(SCH2CH2OH)2(NO)4 (4),
and the 2-sulfonato-ethyl ester, Na2[Fe2(SCH2CH2SO3)2-
(NO)4] (5).
Flash photolysis experiments were carried out on a time-resolved
optical (TRO) apparatus described previously.4b The pump source
was a Continuum NY60-20 nanosecond pulse Nd:YAG laser
operating in the third harmonic (355 nm) and attenuated to 10-30
mJ/pulse. The probe source was a high pressure, short arc xenon
lamp. Kinetic traces were obtained using a SPEX Doublemate
monochromator and RCA model 8852 PMT for detection. The
eventual photolysis product is an orange solid that would build up
on the laser cell after repetitive laser flashes, and formation of such
solids could potentially compromise the data collection for a given
experiment. For this reason, fresh 3 mL aliquots of the ester
solutions were flashed a maximum of 10 times each, and the
solutions were shaken between each flash experiment. Such
procedures reduced the opportunity for improving signal/noise ratio
by signal averaging.
Experimental Section
Materials. Water for spectroscopic studies was purified by a
Millipore system. Methanol was distilled under nitrogen from I2
and Mg. Acetonitrile was distilled under dinitrogen from CaH2 and
used immediately. Chromatographic grade argon was purchased
from Air Liquide and used as received. All inert atmosphere
manipulations were performed on a vacuum manifold. Deaeration
of the solutions was achieved by 3 freeze-pump-thaw (f-p-t)
cycles. Nitric oxide (99.0%) was purchased from Matheson and
passed through a stainless steel column that contained Ascarite II
(NaOH on a silicate carrier) to remove higher nitrogen oxides.
Stainless steel tubing and fittings were used to transfer gases.
Manifold connections were accomplished by using stainless steel-
to-glass fittings.
Syntheses. The Roussin’s red ester compounds were prepared
by literature methods.6b These esters are moderately air and light
sensitive and require long-term storage in the dark and under inert
atmosphere.
Instruments. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded for
solutions in 1 cm path length quartz cells using a HP8572 diode
array spectrophotometer. Infrared spectra were obtained using a
BioRad FTS 60 SPC 3200 FTIR spectrometer and IR cells equipped
with CaF2 windows.
Photochemical Experiments. Solutions for continuous photoly-
sis experiments were generally about 10-4 M in RSE concentration
while those for flash experiments were in the range 35-40 mM.
All continuous and flash experiments were carried out at 295 ((1)
K. Quartz photolysis cells (1.0 cm) were used in both types of
experiments. When a controlled atmosphere (Ar, NO, or O2) was
necessary, the photolysis cell consisted of a triple O-ring Chemglass
Teflon stopcock, a four-sided quartz cuvette, and an O-ring adapter
for connection to a gas/vacuum manifold. Concentrations were
calculated from published solubility data.7
Continuous photolyses (CW) were performed using an optical
train with an Oriel 200 W Hg arc lamp in an Oriel lamp housing
model 66033 as the light source. Interference filters were used to
isolate the appropriate excitation wavelengths. Chemical actinometry
was performed with ferric oxalate solutions.8 All solutions in the
CW experiments were stirred continuously and kept from exposure
to extraneous light.
The quantitative determination for the photochemical production
of Fe2+ from the ester complexes was accomplished by adding a
1,10-phenanthroline solution and recording the intensity of the
characteristic 510 nm absorbance of the Fe(phen)32+ species formed.
Addition of 1,10-phen to RSE solutions which had not been
Fe2(µ-SCH3)2(NO)4 (1), Fe2(µ-CH2CH3)2(NO)4 (2), Fe2-
(µ-CH2C6H5)2(NO)4 (3), and Fe2(µ-SCH2CH2OH)2(NO)4 (4).6
The methyl ester (1) was prepared by the procedure described by
Seyferth and co-workers.6b Similar procedures were followed to
prepare Fe2(µ-SCH2CH3)2(NO)4 (2) and Fe2(µ-SCH2C6H5)2(NO)4
(3) with the exception that iodoethane, benzyl iodide, or 2-iodo-
ethanol was used, respectively, instead of iodomethane. These
compounds were characterized by both IR and UV-vis spectros-
copy. (1). UV-vis (MeOH) (λmax in nm (ꢀ in M-1 cm-1)): 312
(8.3 × 103), 364 (7.8 × 103). IR (CH3CN) (νmax in cm-1 (ꢀ in M-1
cm-1)): 1778 (5.8 × 103), 1752 (5.3 × 103), 1800 (w). (2). UV-
vis (CH3CN): 310 (9.1 × 103), 364 (8.7 × 103). IR (CH3CN): 1776
(5.9 × 103), 1750 (5.2 × 103), 1800 (w). (3). UV-vis (CHCl3):
312 (9.3 × 103), 364 (8.5 × 103). IR (CHCl3): 1778 (5.5 × 103),
1751 (5.0 × 103), 1800 (w). FAB (NBA matrix): m/z 448 (Fe2-
(SCH2C6H5)2(NO)3)+, 418 (Fe2(µ-SCH2C6H5)2(NO)2+. (4). UV-
vis (MeOH): 312 (9.3 × 103), 362 (8.5 × 103). IR (MeOH): 1778
(5.8 × 103), 1752 (5.6 × 103), 1800 cm-1 (w). ESI (methanol/
water): m/z 386 (Fe2(SCH2CH2OH)2(NO)4]-).
Na2[Fe2(µ-SCH2CH2SO3)2(NO)4] (5). A solution of Na2[Fe2S2-
(NO)4]‚8H2O (RRS) (1.0 g; 2.1 mmol) plus the sodium salt of
bromoethanesulfonic acid (1.0 g; 4.7 mmol) in 75 mL of deoxy-
genated water was prepared. The mixture was stirred under argon,
and then the solution was heated at reflux under argon for 1 h. The
volume was reduced by rotary evaporation to approximately 10
mL and was then cooled to 5 °C. The result was a crop of shiny,
brownish-red crystals. The product was recrystallized from a
minimum volume of hot water and stored under argon in a
refrigerator. The product was characterized by UV-vis and IR
spectroscopy and ESI MS. The UV-vis spectrum was similar to
those seen for the other ester compounds.6 UV-vis (H2O) (λmax in
nm (ꢀ in M-1 cm-1)): 310 (9.2 × 103), 364 (8.9 × 103). IR (CH3-
CN) (νmax in cm-1 (ꢀ in M-1 cm-1)): 1782 (5.6 × 103), 1757 (5.8
× 103), 1821 (w). Aqueous solution negative ion ESI-MS m/z
(5) (a) Flitney, F. W.; Megson, I. L.; Thomson, J. L. M.; Kennovin, G.
D.; Butler, A. R. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 117, 1549. (b) Carter, T.;
Bettache, N.; Corrie, J. E. T.; Ogden, D.; Trentham, D. R. Methods
Enzymol. 1996, 268, 266-281. (c) Namiki, S.; Kaneda, F.; Ikegami,
M.; Arai, T.; Fujimori, K.; Asada, S.; Hama, H.; Kasuyua, Y.; Goto,
K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 1695-1702. (d) Fukuhar, K.;
Kurihara, M.; Miyata, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8662-8666.
(6) (a) Glidewell, C.; Lambert, R. J.; Harman, M. E.; Hursthouse, M. B.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1990, 2685-2690. (b) Seyferth, D.;
Gallagher, M. K.; Cowie, M. Organometallics 1986, 5, 539-548. (c)
Sung, S. S.; Glidewell, C.; Butler, A. R.; Hoffman, R. Inorg. Chem.
1985, 24, 3856. (d) Butler, A. R.; Glidewell, C.; Hyde, A. R.;
McGinnis, J. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2931-2934. (e) Thomas, J. T.;
Robertson, J. H.; Cox, E. G. Acta Crystallogr. 1958, 11, 599.
(7) Battino, R.; Clever, H. L.; Young, C. L. IUPAC Solubility Data Series;
Pergamon Press: New York, 1985; Vol. 8, p 261.
(relative intensity): 535 (18) [(Fe2(SCH2CH2SO3)2(NO)4)Na]1-
,
505 (21) [(Fe2(SCH2CH2SO3)2(NO)3)Na]1-, 483 (12) [(Fe2-
(SCH2CH2SO3)2(NO)3),H]1-, 372 (5) [(Fe2(SCH2CH2SO3)(NO)4)]1-
,
342 (8) (Fe2(SCH2-CH2SO3)1(NO)3]1-), 256 (48)([Fe-
(SCH2CH2SO3)(NO)2]1-), 226 (100) ([Fe1(SCH2-CH2SO3)1(NO)1]1-).
CHN elemental analysis Calcd for C4H8N4O10S4Fe2Na2‚(3 H2O):
C, 7.84; H, 2.29; N, 9.15. Found (UCSB Marine Biology Analytical
Labs): C, 7.87; H, 2.05; N, 8.67. Iron analysis by flame atomic
(8) Calvert, J. G.; Pitts, J. N. Photochemistry; Wiley: New York, 1967;
pp 783-786.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2003 2289