Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
::
7308 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 15, 2009
Sturzbecher-Hohne et al.
(þ31 ( 1 kJ mol-1), in excellent agreement with other pub-
lished values.10-13 We summarize the published thermody-
namic values in Figure 1. The Gibbs energies of formation of
ONOOH (þ31 ( 1 kJ mol-1),10,12 NO2• (63 ( 1 kJ mol-1),14
and HO• (26 ( 1 kJ mol-1 15,16
and the published rate constant
)
for reaction 4 (4.5 ꢀ 109 M-1 s-1 17,18
)
have been used to predict
a rate of homolysis of ONOOH at the O-O bond (reaction 4) of
0.38 ( 0.25 s-1 10,11,19
However, this approach is valid only
.
when no branching of the reaction coordinate occurs, which is
not the case here: the reaction of HO• with NO2 yields two
•
Figure 1. The reaction coordinate for the photolysis of NO3- showing
products, namely, ONOOH and NO3-/Hþ.18 Since we have
searched for, but have been unable to find, evidence of
significant levels of formation of HO• from ONOOH,20-24 we
attempted to stimulate reaction 4 by laser flash photolysis.
A pathway of homolysis of ONOOH, distinct from reaction
Gibbs energies of formation of ONOOH, ONOO-, and NO3 and
-
possible products of homolysis and experimentally determined activation
energy barriers. Activation energies and the barriers for homolysis of
ONOO- to NO• and O2•- and isomerization of ONOOH to NO3 are
-
shown in red. Gibbs energies of reaction are shown in black.
4, leads to the formation of NO• and HO2 (reaction 5). The
•
All reagent gases were obtained from PanGas (Dagmer-
sellen, CH). LiONOO was prepared as previously
described.33 All other chemicals were obtained at the
highest purity available and used as received. A Milli-
pore Milli-Q unit (Molsheim, F) was used to purify
deionized water.
energies of these products of reaction lie 20 kJ mol-1 above those
of the products of reaction 4 (Figure 1): ΔfG°(NO•) = 102 ( 0.2
kJ mol-1 is calculated from ΔfG°(NO•)g = þ86.57 kJ mol-1 25
and Henry’s constant, 1.92 ꢀ 10-3 M 0.100 MPa-1 26 at 25 °C;
•
ΔfG°(HO2 ) = 6.4 ( 1.0 kJ mol-1 is based on E°(O2/O2•-) =
350 ( 11 mV27 and pKa,6 = 4.8 ( 0.1 for HO2•.28 With k-5
=
Instrumentation. UV/vis spectra were recorded with a
double-beam Analytik Jena Specord 200 (Jena, D). Rapid
mixing was achieved by the stopped-flow mixing unit
from Applied Photophysics, SX 17MV (Leatherhead,
Surrey, Great Britain), that was operated in the sym-
metric mixing mode interfaced to an Applied Photo-
physics LKS 50 instrument (Leatherhead, Surrey, Great
Britain). The quartz cell was asymmetric with a 10 mm
optical path length, a 2 mm laser path length, and a total
volume of 0.08 cm3; measurements were performed at
25 °C, maintained with a thermostat. Optical changes
were collected and stored on a WaveRunner 64Xi
digital oscilloscope from Lecroy (Chestnut Ridge, NY).
The bandwidth chosen for these experiments was
20 MHz, and the sampling rate was 200 MHz. The third
(λ=355 nm) or fourth (λ=266 nm) harmonic of a Quantel
Brilliant B Nd:YAG laser (Les Ulis Cedex, F) was used
with a pulse duration of 6 ns and spot size of
9 mm. The laser energies were determined with a PRD-J
peak-reading joulemeter from Gentec Inc. (Sainte-Foy,
Quebec, Canada). The pH was measured with a Metrohm
glass electrode (Herisau, Switzerland) interfaced with a
901 microprocessor analyzer from Orion Research, Inc.
(Cambridge, MA).
3.2 ꢀ 109 M-1 s-129 and the Gibbs energies of formation of
ONOOH, NO•,andHO2•,wecalculatek5=(0.8(1.0) ꢀ 10-4s-1,
which is more than 4 orders of magnitude lower than k4.
•
•
We report here that NO• and HO2 , but not NO2 and HO•,
are formed by the photolysis of ONOOH. The observed
products recombine rapidly to form ONOOH.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals. (Me4N)ONOO was prepared from NO• and
(Me4N)O2 according to the method of Bohle et al.30-32
ꢀ
(10) Merenyi, G.; Lind, J. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1998, 11, 243–246.
ꢀ
(11) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G.; Lind, J.; Merenyi, G. Chem. Res. Toxicol.
2001, 14, 657–660.
ꢀ
(12) Merenyi, G.; Lind, J.; Czapski, G.; Goldstein, S. Inorg. Chem. 2003,
42, 3796–3800.
(13) Lymar, S. V.; Poskrebyshev, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7991–
7996.
(14) Stanbury, D. M. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 33, 69–138.
(15) Schwarz, H. A.; Dodson, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 3643–3647.
::
(16) Klaning, U. K.; Sehested, K.; Holcman, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89,
760–763.
(17) Logager, T.; Sehested, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6664–6669.
ꢀ
(18) Merenyi, G.; Lind, J.; Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. J. Phys. Chem. A
1999, 103, 5685–5691.
(19) Lymar, S. V.; Khairutdinov, R. F.; Hurst, J. K. Inorg. Chem. 2003,
42, 5259–5266.
Methods. Photolysis of NO3-. Argon-saturated 1 M
(20) Kissner, R.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 234–239.
::
(21) Maurer, P.; Thomas, C. F.; Kissner, R.; Ruegger, H.; Greter, O.;
::
-
NO3 solutions were excited at 266 nm at pH 2.9-4.4,
Rothlisberger, U.; Koppenol, W. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 1763–1769.
and subsequent reactions were followed at 260 and 330 nm.
Highly concentrated solutions of NO3- were used because
of the low absorbance of NO3- at 266 nm (ε266=1.5 M-1
cm-1). ONOO (M = (Me4N)þ, Liþ) solutions were freshly
prepared in 10 mM MOH (M = Kþ, Liþ), kept in the dark
on ice.
(22) Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Kurz, C.; Koppenol, W. H. IUBMB Life
2003, 55, 567–572.
(23) Kissner, R.; Thomas, C.; Hamsa, M. S. A.; van Eldik, R.; Koppenol,
W. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 11261–11263.
(24) Kurz, C.; Zeng, X.; Hannemann, S.; Kissner, R.; Koppenol, W. H. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 965–969.
(25) Wagman, D. D.; Evans, W. H.; Parker, V. B.; Schumm, R. H.;
Halow, I.; Bailey, S. M.; Churney, K. L.; Nuttal, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. Ref.
Data 1982, 11(Suppl. 2), 37–38.
(26) Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R.; Wilcock, R. J. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 219–
262.
(27) Wardman, P. Free Radical Res. Commun. 1991, 14, 57–67.
(28) Bielski, B. H. J.; Cabelli, D. E.; Arudi, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
1985, 14, 1041–1100.
Photolysis of ONOO-. Argon-saturated solutions of
ONOO- at ca. 2 mM in 10 mM MOH were mixed by
stopped-flow techniques at 25 °C with either 20 mM
H3PO4 or 100 mM pivalate buffer as a proton source to
final pH values of 2-5.5. After 5 ms of mixing, excitation
of ONOOH was achieved with a laser pulse of 266 or
355 nm with energies of 10-140 mJ/pulse (266 nm) or
(29) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 505–510.
(30) Bohle, D. S.; Hansert, B.; Paulson, S. C.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 7423–7424.
(31) Bohle, D. S.; Glassbrenner, P. A.; Hansert, B. Methods Enzymol.
1996, 269, 302–311.
(32) Bohle, D. S.; Sagan, E. S. Inorg. Synth. 2004, 34, 36–42.
::
(33) Sturzbecher-Hohne, M.; Kissner, R.; Nauser, T.; Koppenol, W. H.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 2257–2259.