0
Pd ꢀcatalyzed allylation of CH acids
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 55, No. 11, November, 2006 2105
in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed on SiO with EtOAc
3.73 (t, 2 H, CH N, J = 6.7 Hz); 4.16 (dd, 1 H, CHS, J =
2
2
as an eluent. The yield of amide 8 was 2.41 g (95%), colorless
crystals, m.p. 119—121 °C (EtOAc). Found (%): C, 56.95;
5.4 Hz, J = 9.3 Hz); 5.05 (ddd, 1 H, H С=С, J = 1.3 Hz, J =
2
2.5 Hz, J = 10.0 Hz); 5.10 (ddd, 1 H, H С=С, J = 1.3 Hz, J =
2
H, 6.18; N, 5.55; S, 12.47. C12H15NO S. Calculated (%):
C, 56.90; H, 5.97; N, 5.53; S, 12.66. MS, m/z (Irel (%)): 190 (3),
2.5 Hz, J = 17.0 Hz); 5.64 (dddd, 1 H, HC=С, J = 6.9 Hz, J =
6.9 Hz, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 17.0 Hz); 7.50—7.95 (m, 5 H, Harom).
3
1
9
89 (24), 188 (5), 141 (7), 113 (24), 112 (100), 110 (7), 99 (7),
8 (57), 96 (23), 84 (15), 83 (54), 78 (8), 77 (52), 70 (57), 69
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 06ꢀ03ꢀ
32238).
–
1
(
14), 56 (13), 55 (36). IR (KBr), ν/cm : 629, 732, 756, 776,
8
1
60, 904—1036, 1084, 1156, 1188, 1232, 1264, 1312, 1324, 1352,
1
408, 1440, 1584, 1608, 1648, 2888—2984. H NMR, δ: 1.90
(
7
m, 4 H, 2 CH ); 3.45 (m, 4 H, 2 CH N); 3.64 (s, 2 H, CH S);
.25, 7.45 (both m, 5 H, Harom).
2
2
2
References
Nꢀ(2ꢀPhenylsulfonylpentꢀ4ꢀenoyl)pyrrolidine (9). Triphenylꢀ
phosphine (104 mg, 0.40 mmol) was added at 25 °С to a stirred
1. B. M. Trost and D. L. Van Vranken, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 395.
2. J. Tsuji, I. Shimizu, I. Minami, Y. Ohashi, T. Sugiura, and
K. Takahashi, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 1523.
suspension (argon) of Pd (dba) (CHCl ) (52 mg, 0.05 mmol) in
2
3
3
THF (3 mL). After 30 min, a solution of allyl carbonate 6
(
(
690 mg, 2 mmol) and sulfone 8 (250 mg, 1 mmol) in THF
3. F. GaudemarꢀBardone and M. Gaudemar, Synthesis,
1979, 463.
4. J. V. Allen, S. J. Coote, G. J. Dawson, C. G. Frost, C. J.
Martin, and J. M. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1994, 2065.
4 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 30 °С
t
for 1 h, diluted with MeOBu (20 mL), and filtered through a
short pad of SiO . The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and the
residue was chromatographed on SiO (25 g) with light petroꢀ
leum—MeOBu (1 : 1) as an eluent. The yield of amide 9 was
2
(
2
2
t
5. B. Burns, E. Merifield, M. F. Mahon, K. C. Molloy, and
50 mg (85%), m.p. 102—104 °C (EtOAc—hexane), [α]D20
0
M. Wills, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1993, 2243.
6. J. R. Hwu, C. N. Chen, and S.ꢀS. Shiao, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 856.
7. Y. Tanaka, T. Mino, K. Akita, M. Sakamoto, and T. Fujita,
J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 6679.
8. R. Lakhmiri, P. Lhoste, D. Sinou, and P. Boullanger, J. Chem.
Res., Miniprint, 1990, 2301.
9. A. V. Lozanova, T. M. Ugurchieva, M. V. Zlokazov, A. V.
Stepanov, and V. V. Veselovsky, Mendeleev Commun., 2006, 15.
с 2, СHCl ). Found (%): C, 61.45; H, 6.74; N, 4.81; S, 10.90.
3
C H NO S. Calculated (%): C, 61.41; H, 6.53; N, 4.77;
1
5
19
3
+
S, 10.93. MS, m/z (Irel (%)): 293 [M] (5), 252 (3), 230 (9), 229
41), 228 (11), 200 (3), 153 (37), 152 (100), 141 (21), 136 (35),
25 (37), 124 (37), 123 (32), 112 (18), 110 (21), 104 (42), 98
(
1
(
5
9
1
2
61), 97 (24), 83 (48), 82 (29), 81 (46), 77 (51), 72 (42), 70 (88),
6 (56), 55 (72). IR (KBr), ν/cm–1: 692, 724, 772, 836, 916,
88, 1040, 1084, 1148, 1288, 1316, 1348, 1440, 1472, 1584,
1
648, 2888, 2984. H NMR, δ: 1.80—2.04 (m, 4 H, 2 CH );
2
.60—2.72 (m, 2 H, HC(3)); 3.40, 3.73 (both m, 2 H, CH N);
Received July 11, 2006
2