J IRAN CHEM SOC
Table 4 Comparison of the resuꢀts obtained for suꢀfoxidation of methyꢀphenyꢀ suꢀfide cataꢀyzed by [V (O) (H O) BOX] with some previousꢀy
2
4
2
4
reported systems
o
−1
)
Entry
Cataꢀyst
Oxidant
H O
Conditions ( C)/soꢀvent
TOF (h
References
1
2
3
[V (O) (H O) BOX]
Reflux/ethanoꢀ
Reflux/DCE
2,923
750
This work
[26]
2
4
2
4
2
2
Mo O (acac) box
TBHP
2
4
2
V(O)(acac)[(2S,4R)-N-benzyꢀ-4 hydroxy- 4-
H O /TBHP
55/acetonitriꢀe
530/832
[31]
2
2
phenyꢀ-2-(1,1 diphenyꢀmethyꢀ)pyrroꢀidinyꢀmethanoꢀ]
4
MoO2l, l = (2S,4R)-N benzyꢀ- 4-hydroxy-4-
H O /TBHP
55/acetonitriꢀe
447/258
[31]
2
2
phenyꢀ-2-(1,1-diphenyꢀmethyꢀ)pyrroꢀidinyꢀmethanoꢀ
a
5
6
7
cis-[MoO (phox) ]
UHP
UHP
UHP
(1:1) mixture of CH Cꢀ /CH OH
114
219
205
[32]
[33]
[33]
2
2
2
2
3
a
4
[Mn(phox) (MeOH) ]CꢀO
(1:1) mixture of CH Cꢀ /CH OH
2 2 3
2
2
Mn(phox)a
(1:1) mixture of CH Cꢀ /CH OH
2 2 3
3
a
Hphox = 2-(20-hydroxyphenyꢀ)oxazoꢀine
the same reaction was carried out in the absence of cataꢀyst
Fiꢁ. 5).
To choose the reaction media, different soꢀvents were
aꢀso tested and ethanoꢀ was chosen as the best soꢀvent
because of not onꢀy beinꢁ a ꢁreen soꢀvent but aꢀso the
hiꢁher amount of suꢀfoxide produced (Fiꢁ. 6).
Conclusion
(
In summary, we synthesized a new binucꢀear vanadium
compꢀex and demonstrated its hiꢁh cataꢀytic activity in the
oxidation of various aꢀkenes usinꢁ TBHP and acetonitriꢀe
and ꢁreen oxidation of suꢀfides usinꢁ H O and ethanoꢀ as
2
2
Different oxidants such as H O , NaIO , tert-BuOOH,
ꢁreen soꢀvent and oxidant, respectiveꢀy, under homoꢁene-
ous conditions. The exceꢀꢀent chemoseꢀectivity of this com-
pꢀex toward aꢀkenes and the suꢀfur ꢁroup, as weꢀꢀ as the
hiꢁh yieꢀds makes it a ꢁood choice for oxidation.
2
2
4
and H O /Urea (UHP) were aꢀso investiꢁated in the oxida-
2
2
tion of diphenyꢀ suꢀfide. The resuꢀts showed that H O is
2
2
the best oxyꢁen source (Fiꢁ. 7).
Various H O moꢀar amounts were aꢀso tested. The
2
2
Acknowledgments We ꢁratefuꢀꢀy acknowꢀedꢁe The University of
resuꢀts showed that when 2 mmoꢀ of the oxidant was used,
the hiꢁhest yieꢀds of suꢀfoxide were obtained (Fiꢁ. 8).
This cataꢀytic system is extremeꢀy ꢁreen and efficient
and cataꢀyzes the oxidation of a wide ranꢁe of suꢀfides, and
the suꢀfoxide and suꢀfone are produced usinꢁ cataꢀyst, sub-
strate, and oxidant in a moꢀar ratio of 1:100:200, respec-
tiveꢀy. The resuꢀts are summarized in Tabꢀe 3. Most suꢀfides
were compꢀeteꢀy converted to their correspondinꢁ suꢀfox-
ides whiꢀe upon increasinꢁ the reaction times, the suꢀfones
were aꢀso detected in the reaction mixture. In aꢀꢀ cases, two
different reaction times are reported. In the case of ꢀinear
suꢀfides, by increasinꢁ the reaction time, the seꢀectivity
compꢀeteꢀy chanꢁed to suꢀfone production.
The obtained resuꢀts in this work were compared with
those of the previousꢀy reported simiꢀar moꢀybdenum com-
pꢀex [26]. As shown, the product yieꢀds are hiꢁher usinꢁ
vanadium compꢀex [26]. To further show the efficiency of
this cataꢀytic system, some of the resuꢀts obtained by our
method were compared with some of those reported in the
Isfahan Counciꢀ of Research for the support of this work.
References
1
2
. K.A. Jorꢁensen, Chem. Rev. 89, 431 (1989)
. R. Prabu, A. Vijayaraj, R. Suresh, R. Shenbhaꢁaraman, V. Kavi-
yarasan, V. Narayanan, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 11, 825 (2014)
. g. grivani, A. Haꢀiꢀi, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 11, 163 (2014)
. H. Eꢀ-ghamry, R. Eꢀ-Sharkawy, M. gaber, J. Iran. Chem. Soc.
3
4
1
1, 379 (2014)
5
. D. Rehder, J. CostaPessoa, C.F. geraꢀdes, M.C. Castro, T. Kaba-
nos, T. Kiss, B. Meier, g. Micera, l. Pettersson, M. Ranꢁeꢀ, A.
Saꢀifoꢁꢀou, I. Tureꢀ, D. Wanꢁ, J. Bioꢀ. Inorꢁ. Chem. 7, 384 (2002)
. A.g.J. liꢁtenbarꢁ, R. Haꢁe, B.l. Ferinꢁa, Coord. Chem. Rev.
6
7
2
37, 89 (2003)
. A. Butꢀer, M.J. Cꢀaꢁue, g.E. Meister, Chem. Rev. 94, 625 (1994)
8. P.g. Cozzi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33, 410 (2004)
. P.A. Jacobi, H. liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1958 (1999)
9
1
1
1
0. S.g. Pyne, Suꢀfur Reports 21, 281 (1999)
1. l.l. Merritt, E. Schroeder, Acta Cryst. 9, 801 (1956)
2. A. Simion, C. Simion, T. Kanda, S. Naꢁashima, Y. Mitoma, T.
Yamada, K. Mimura, M. Tashiro, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1,
ꢀ
iterature for methyꢀphenyꢀ suꢀfide (Tabꢀe 2). As can be
2
071 (2001)
3. J.E. Tayꢀor, S.D. Buꢀꢀa, J.M.J. Wiꢀꢀiams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41,
109 (2012)
seen, in aꢀꢀ cases the present method is more efficient in the
suꢀfoxidation of suꢀfides. It is aꢀso important to note that the
1
2
oxidant (H O ) and the soꢀvent (ethanoꢀ) are both ꢁreen,
2
2
14. R. Roꢁer, D.g. Neiꢀson, Chem. Rev. 61, 179 (1961)
which are of practicaꢀ importance from an environmentaꢀ
point of view (Tabꢀe 4).
15. M.I. Burꢁuete, J.M. Fraiꢀe, E. garcia-Verduꢁo, S.V. luis, V. Mar-
tinez-Merino, J.A. Mayoraꢀ, Ind. Enꢁ. Chem. Res. 44, 8580 (2005)
1
3