Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
COMMUNICATIONS
[13] a) A. K. Mitra, A. De, N. Karchaudhuri, J. Mitra, J. Chem. Res. (S)
1998, 766 767; b) G. M. Boland, D. M. X. Donnelly, J.-P. Finet, M. D.
Rea, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2591 2597.
Single-Compound Libraries of Organic
Materials: From the Combinatorial Synthesis of
Conjugated Oligomers to Structure Property
Relationships**
[14] Quest 210 Synthesizer, Fa. Argonaut Technologies.
[15] compare witha) W. Kˆnig, W. Scharrnbeck, J. Prakt. Chem. 1930, 128,
153 170; b) M. S. Wong, J.-F. Nicoud, Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
8237 8240; c) Y. Kobayashi, R. Mizojiri, E. Ikeda, J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 5391 5399; d) A. Finch, J. C. Lockhart, J. Chem. Soc. 1962,
3723 3728. The boronic acids A7, A9, and A10 are unpublished.
[16] SPE Solid-phase extraction; for filtration columns with RP-18
material was used in conjunction witha ™VacMaster SPE Processing
Station∫ (Separtis IST); mobile phase: acetonitrile/water.
[17] Purification and mass detection were performed on an HPLC-MS
(Waters) fitted witha LC/MS detector (Micromass ZMD; electro-
spray ionization (ESI) mode). Chromatography performed on Xterra
RP-18 (analytic: 3.5 mm, 4.6 Â 100 mm; semi-preparative: 7.0 mm,
19 Â 150 mm) columns (Waters) withan acetonitrile water gradient.
[18] The following references were utilized for the synthesis of bromo-
coumarins 2 4, 7, and 8: 2: F. Peters, H. Simonis, Chem. Ber. 1908, 41,
830 837; 3: K. Takagi, M. Hubert-Habart, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1980, 2,
444 448; 4: a) B. B. Dey, K. K. Row, J. Chem. Soc. 1923, 123, 3375
3384; b) B. B. Dey, T. R. Seshadri, Chem. Zentralbl. 1926, 97, 1648
1649; 7, 8: N. A. Gordeeva, M. A. Kirpichenok, N. S. Patalakha, I. I.
Grandberg, Chem. Hetreocycl. Compd. (Engl. Transl.) 1990, 26,
1329 1337; Bromocoumarins 5 and 6 were available by selective
nitration and subsequent reduction starting from coumarin 2 and 3:
KNO3 (1.22 g, 12 mmol) was added to a solution of coumarin 2 or 3
(10 mmol) in 96% sulfuric acid (60 mL) at 08C. After stirring at 08C
Christoph A. Briehn, Marc-Steffen Schiedel,
Eva M. Bonsen, Wolfgang Schuhmann, and
Peter B‰uerle*
The development process of novel materials is often
encumbered by the time-consuming ™one-at-a-time∫ process
of material synthesis and evaluation. This situation is partic-
ularly true for p-conjugated oligomers which serve as model
compounds for conducting polymers and are recognized as
materials in their own right.[1] Accordingly, there is a need for
novel methods that provide for both rapid compound
generation and subsequent evaluation. Combinatorial meth-
odologies that were developed for the high-speed synthesis
and high-throughput screening of pharmaceuticals could help
to overcome these bottlenecks in the materials development
process.[2] Moreover, the rapid generation of data sets
provided by combinatorial methods and their subsequent
translation into structure property relationships may enable
the rational design of new materials.
for 2.5 h, the solution was poured into crushed ice forming
a
precipitate. This precipitate was collected and washed successively
withdiluted Na 2CO3 solution. The pure 6-nitrated derivatives were
obtained by recrystallizing from ethanol/water (95/5). For the
reduction, the nitro compounds (10 mmol) were dissolved at 1008C
in 80% acetic acid (200 mL) and treated portionwise withiron powder
(3.35 g, 60 mmol). After 10 min the solution was poured into ice and
extracted several times with chloroform. The solvent was subsequent-
ly removed and the crude product purified by column chromatog-
raphy on silica (hexane/ethylacetate 50/50; overall yields: 66% (5),
63% (6)).
While most of the combinatorial approaches in materials
science concentrate on the development of inorganic solid-
state materials, polymeric materials, and catalytic systems,[3]
we report here and in the preceding correspondence[4] the
development of combinatorial strategies for the generation of
organic materials. The focus of this study is the combinatorial
synthesis and subsequent screening of oligothiophenes which
are one of the most examined classes of p-conjugated
oligomers.[5] The strategy covers all stages of the combinato-
rial discovery process: design of the lead structure, elabo-
ration of the synthetic route, generation of the library and
purification, screening, and data analysis. We focused on a
regioregular head-to-tail coupled quater(3-arylthiophene) as
the lead structure (Scheme 1). Because of their defined
structure these aryl substituted oligomers, together with the
already intensively investigated oligo(3-alkylthiophene)s, are
outstanding model compounds for the parent (polydisperse)
poly(3-arylthiophene)s and poly(3-alkylthiophene)s.[6] The
[19] Representative example for a parallel Suzuki cross-coupling: syn-
thesis of 7-amino-4-methyl-3-p-tolyl-chromen-2-one (7A2): Couma-
rin 7 (25.4 mg, 0.1 mmol), boronic ester A2 (35.2 mg, 0.2 mmol), CsF
(121 mg, 0.8 mmol), and [Pd(PPh3)4] (5.78 mg, 5 mol%) were heated
at 908C under argon in dry dioxane for 16 h. The solvent was
evaporated and the residue was dissolved in acetonitrile/water. This
solution was then filtered through a SPE (RP-18) column and purified
by automated HPLC-MS affording the pure product (21.2 mg, 80%).
M.p. 260 2628C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D6]DMSO, 258C): d 7.44 (d,
J 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (d, J 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.60
(dd, J 8.7, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (broad s, 2H),
2.33 (s, 3H), 2.13 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, [D6]DMSO, 258C):
d 160.8, 154.6, 152.8, 148.6, 136.6, 132.5, 130.5 (2C), 128.7 (2C),
126.8, 119.8, 111.6, 109.4, 98.5, 21.0, 16.3; UV/Vis (ethanol): lmax
(e [LmolÀ1 cmÀ1]) 360 nm (22500); EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (%) : 265
(88) [M ], 237 (100) [M À CO].
[*] Prof. Dr. P. B‰uerle, Dr. C. A. Briehn, Dipl.-Chem. M.-S. Schiedel
Abteilung Organische Chemie II (Organische Materialien und
Kombinatorische Chemie)
[20] For further structure validation 20% of the library members were
characterized spectroscopically (1H NMR).
[21] Optically dilute measurements withrefractive-index corrections,
maximal absorption of the solutions ꢀ0.04. Calibrated spectrometer
(Perkin Elmer LS 50B); measurements referenced to 9,10-dipheny-
lanthracene (ff 0.95); a) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,
2nd ed. (Ed.: J. R. Lakowicz), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,
New York, 1999; b) J. N. Demas, G. A. Crosby, J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75,
991 1024.
[22] T. Besson, G. Coudert, G. Guillaumet, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1991, 28,
1517 1523.
[23] a) C. Schmitz, P. Pˆsch, M. Thelakkat, H.-W. Schmidt, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 1777 1781; b) C. Schmitz, M. Thelakkat, H.-W.
Schmidt, Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 821 826.
Universit‰t Ulm
Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm (Germany)
Fax : (49)731-502-2840
Dr. E. M. Bonsen, Prof. Dr. W. Schuhmann
Analytische Chemie–Elektroanalytik and Sensorik
Ruhr-Universit‰t Bochum, 44780 Bochum (Germany)
[**] This work was made possible with funds donated from Fonds der
¬
Chemischen Industrie, the BMBF (Kekule grant to C.A.B) and the
DFG (Schu 929/5-1). We thank Prof. V. Austel, the University of Ulm,
for valuable discussions and also Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceut-
icals Inc., Ridgefield (USA), for apparatus support.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under
4680
¹ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4024-4680 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 24