2744
H. Pohjanlehto et al. / Carbohydrate Research 346 (2011) 2736–2745
product was first precipitated with 4 L of acetone, left to settle
overnight and washed with 2 ꢂ 1 L of acetone. Excess acetone
was decanted and the precipitate left to dry in air overnight. The
product was dissolved in 250 mL of water and purified by dialysis
for two nights, first night in running tap water and the second
night in standing deionized water (suitable membrane cut-off
was 3500 Da) and finally freeze-dried to obtain 26.9 g of white
crystalline solid. More product was obtained by evaporating the
acetone from the supernatant remaining from the precipitation
step. A slimy residue was obtained after pouring out the excess
water. The residue was diluted with a small amount of ethanol,
and dialyzed and freeze-dried as previously described to obtain
32.9 g of pure product. Overall yield 59.8 g (38%).
the mean degree of swelling was then calculated. The degree of
swelling was determined by the following equation:
mwet ꢀ mdry
Degree of swelling ¼
ꢃ 100%
mdry
4. Conclusions
Novel hydrogels were synthesized using bio-based starting
materials. Xylan was derivatized to different degrees of substitu-
tion of 1-allyloxy-2-hydroxy-propyl (A) groups combined with 1-
butyloxy-2-hydroxy-propyl (B) and/or hydroxypropyl (HP) groups.
The sugar diacids used as cross-linkers were derivatized chemi-
cally to N,N0-diallylaldardiamides (DA). The most important corre-
lation was observed between the cross-linking efficiency of the
allylic double bonds and the water absorbency. The water absor-
bency (up to 350%) was highest for hydrogels prepared from
HPX-A with the lowest cross-linking efficiency 18%. Contrarily,
the lowest water absorbency (about 100%) was observed for hydro-
gels prepared from X-BA with the highest cross-linking efficiency
of 50%. When the cross-linking efficiency of allylic double bonds
of xylan derivatives increases the incorporation of an additional
DA cross-linker into the hydrogel network decreases. However,
the amount of DA cross-linkers had only a small influence on the
water absorbencies. The use of DA cross-linkers in the preparation
of hydrogels had an influence on the pore structure making it more
uniform. The effect of HP and B substituents to water absorbency
was not so clear: the HP groups in the xylan backbone of HPX-A
(DSHP 0.9) and HPX-BA (DSHP 0.6) seemed to increase the water
absorbency probably due to longer side chains enabling a more
open structure. The more hydrophobic B groups in HPX-BA (DSB
0.3) and X-BA (DSB 0.8) hydrogels may also have a negative effect
on the water absorption properties.
3.4.3. Derivatization of hydroxypropylated xylan with allyl
glycidyl ether
The reaction was performed as in Section 3.4.2 but t-BuOH
(364 mL) was added as a co-solvent to the reaction mixture and
only allyl glycidyl ether (77 mL) was used. The entire product
was obtained from the precipitation step. Yield was 47.4 g (41%).
3.4.4. Derivatization of xylan with allyl and butyl glycidyl ethers
700 mL (750 g, 7.3 wt % of xylan) of a suspension containing
51.1 g of the non-dried xylan was used as a starting material. NaOH
concentration of the suspension was 0.8 M. The reaction mixture
was first heated to 65 °C for 2 h. 100 mL of butyl glycidyl ether
was slowly added (50 min) and let to react overnight. 50 mL of allyl
glycidyl ether was slowly added (50 min) and let to react for an
additional 24 h. The reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 7–8 with
37% HCl. The neutralized reaction mixture was slowly poured into
2.5 L of acetone, excess acetone was decanted, and the precipitate
left to dry in air overnight. The product was purified by dialysis.
The dialyzed xylan in water was freeze-dried yielding 76 g (40%)
of solid white powder.
Acknowledgments
3.5. Preparation of hydrogels
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland through the
Finnish Centre of Excellence in White Biotechnology-Green Chem-
istry-project and by The Finnish Funding agency for Technology and
Innovation (TEKES) through Forestcluster Ltd’s Future Biorefinery
(Fubio) Program in task hemicelluloses and hydroxy acids.
To a solution of 2.0 g of xylan derivative with or without 1 or
5 wt % of DA cross-linker in 20 mL of deionized water, 100 mg
(5 wt %) of radical initiator potassium persulfate was added. The
solution was poured onto a Petri dish, placed in an UV oven and
polymerized under UV light for 3–4 min during which the gels
turned more white and turbid. After cross-linking the gels were
washed several times with deionized water to remove any unre-
acted material and salts. The gels were dried in a vacuum oven
in 40 °C for 48 h or by freeze-drying. Before freeze-drying the
wet gels were immersed in liquid nitrogen.
References
1. Hennink, W. E.; van Nostrum, C. F. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 13–36.
2. Yin, Y.-L.; Prud’homme, R. K.; Stanley, F. In Harland, R. S., Prud’homme, R. K.,
Eds.; Polyelectrolyte Gels: Properties, Preparation, and Applications; ACS
Symposium Series: Washington, DC, 1992; Vol. 480, pp 91–113. Chapter 6.
3. Lee, K. Y.; Mooney, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1869–1879.
4. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 1065–1074.
5. Voepel, J.; Sjöberg, J.; Reif, M.; Albertsson, A.-C.; Hultin, U.-K.; Gasslander, U. J.
Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2401–2412.
6. Guilherme, M. R.; Reis, A. V.; Paulino, A. T.; Moia, T. A.; Mattoso, L. H. C.;
Tambourgi, E. B. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 3146–3154.
7. Wang, W.; Wang, A. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 96, 177–182.
8. Seneviratine, C. M. W. PCT Int. Appl. WO2009/036483 A1.
9. Voepel, J.; Edlund, U.; Albertsson, A.-C. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2009,
47, 3595–3606.
3.6. Bromination
The samples (2 g) were stirred in chloroform (68 mL) for 18 h
protected from light. All the samples were insoluble to chloroform.
A 12% solution of bromine in chloroform was freshly prepared and
10 mL was added to each reaction mixture until a slight excess of
bromine remained. The samples were stirred for 2 h and subse-
quently washed with methanol, aqueous sodium thiosulfate
(10%, w/v), water and once again with methanol. The samples were
dried in a vacuum oven in 40 °C for 24 h.
10. Tanodekaew, S.; Channasanon, S.; Uppanan, P. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100,
1914–1918.
11. Gabrielii, I.; Gatenholm, P. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 1661–1667.
12. Lindblad, M.; Ranucci, E.; Albertsson, A.-C. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22,
962–967.
13. Silva, T. C. F.; Habibi, Y.; Colodette, J. L.; Lucia, L. A. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 1090–
1099.
3.7. Swelling assessments
14. Mojzita, D.; Wiebe, M.; Hilditch, S.; Boer, H.; Penttilä, M.; Richard, P. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 169–175.
15. Van Esch, J. H.; Heeres, A. WO 02/070463 A1, 2002.
16. Anker, H. S. FEBS Lett. 1970, 7, 293.
17. Tabern, D. L. U.S. Patent 2,084,626, 1937.
18. Henkensmeier, D.; Cajus Abele, B.; Candussio, A.; Thiem, J. J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 3814.
For swelling measurements, the gel samples were dried to a
constant weight in 40 °C in a vacuum oven (mdry) and immersed
in excess of deionised water at room temperature. Excess water
was removed with a dry filter paper and the sample (mwet
)
weighed at time intervals. The gels were evaluated in triplets and